Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, MD, FRCOG, Joachim W.

Ed. by Bancalari, Eduardo / Chappelle, Joseph / Chervenak, Frank A. / D'Addario , Vincenzo / Genc, Mehmet R. / Greenough, Anne / Grunebaum, Amos / Konje, Justin C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Romero, Roberto / Zalud, MD PhD, Ivica


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.558
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.653

CiteScore 2018: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.522
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.602

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 30, Issue 1

Issues

Screening for uterine abnormalities by three-dimensional ultrasound improves perinatal outcome

S. Kupešić / A. Kurjak / S. Skenderovic / D. Bjelos
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2002.002

Abstract

The main goal of our study was to assess the true incidence of surgically correctable uterine abnormalities (congenital uterine anomalies, submucous leiomyoma, endometrial polyps and intrauterine synechiae) in the infertile population attending our tertiary infertility clinic. All of the infertile patients enrolled in the study were evaluated by three-dimensional ultrasound. Another objective was to assess pregnancy rates before and after operative hysteroscopy in patients affected by uterine causes of infertility.

Good quality 3D images were obtained in all 3850 infertile patients, and in 23.2% of them 3D US revealed surgically correctable uterine abnormalities. The incidence of uterine septum in our general infertile population was 17.9 %. Uterine septum was the most common uterine abnormality accounting for 77.1% of the intracavitary lesions. Out of 310 patients that were followed-up, 225 (72.6%) patients achieved pregnancy. The rate of term deliveries after septal incision was 57.7%, while 15.4% of patients had preterm deliveries. The rate of spontaneous abortions dropped from 41.7% before, to 11.9% after hysteroscopic resection of the septum.

Three-dimensional ultrasound can be used as a screening method for detection of uterine abnormalities in patients suffering from infertility. We found significant improvement in reproductive outcome after operative hysteroscopy in secondary infertile patients with septate uterus and/or other uterine abnormalities.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 2002-02-26


Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 9–17, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2002.002.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Hayden Anthony Homer
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2018
[3]
Reda Alami, John Hebert, Mohammad Ashraf, and Mostafa Abuzeid
Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 2013, Volume 29, Number 2, Page 88
[4]
Sushila Arya and Sanja Kupesic Plavsic
Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2017, Volume 45, Number 6
[5]
Silvina M. Bocca and Alfred Z. Abuhamad
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2013, Volume 32, Number 1, Page 1
[6]
Sotirios H. Saravelos, Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan, Kamal Ojha, and Tin-Chiu Li
Human Reproduction Update, 2016
[7]
Thomas G. Tullius, Jason Robert Ross, Akwugo Eziefule, Melhem Ghaleb, and Sanja Kupesic Plavsic
Case Reports in Perinatal Medicine, 2012, Volume 1, Number 1-2
[8]
Catherine D. McCormack, Denise L. Furness, Gustaaf A. Dekker, Karen Shand, and Claire T. Roberts
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2016, Volume 19, Number 4, Page 142
[9]
Samantha Pfeifer, Samantha Butts, Daniel Dumesic, Clarisa Gracia, Michael Vernon, Gregory Fossum, Andrew La Barbera, Jennifer Mersereau, Randall Odem, Alan Penzias, Margareta Pisarska, Robert Rebar, Richard Reindollar, Mitchell Rosen, Jay Sandlow, and Eric Widra
Fertility and Sterility, 2016, Volume 106, Number 3, Page 530
[10]
B. Graupera, M. A. Pascual, L. Hereter, J. L. Browne, B. Úbeda, I. Rodríguez, and C. Pedrero
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015, Volume 46, Number 5, Page 616
[11]
Frank Nawroth, Dolores Foth, and Torsten Schmidt
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 2003, Volume 10, Number 3, Page 396
[13]
Giovanni Nazzaro, Mariavittoria Locci, Miranda Marilena, Emilia Salzano, Teresa Palmieri, and Giuseppe De Placido
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2014, Volume 21, Number 5, Page 870
[14]
Ghada K. Gouhar and Soha Siam
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 2013, Volume 44, Number 2, Page 357
[15]
G Ducarme, F Maitrot, G Robinet, and R Gabriel
Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 2004, Volume 32, Number 2, Page 140
[16]
Y. Y. Chan, K. Jayaprakasan, J. Zamora, J. G. Thornton, N. Raine-Fenning, and A. Coomarasamy
Human Reproduction Update, 2011, Volume 17, Number 6, Page 761
[17]
Kemal Ozgur, Mete Isikoglu, Levent Donmez, and Sergio Oehninger
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2007, Volume 14, Number 3, Page 335
[18]
S. Salim, H. Won, E. Nesbitt-Hawes, N. Campbell, and J. Abbott
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2011, Volume 18, Number 5, Page 569
[19]
Chafika Mazouni, Guillaume Girard, Russell Deter, Jean-Baptiste Haumonte, Bernard Blanc, and Florence Bretelle
Fertility and Sterility, 2008, Volume 89, Number 1, Page 219
[21]
Ilan E Timor-Tritsch and Ana Monteagudo
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007, Volume 19, Number 2, Page 157
[22]
Katharina Marten, Silvia Obenauer, Matthias Funke, Eckhardt Grabbe, and Rolf Vosshenrich
Journal of Women's Imaging, 2002, Volume 4, Number 3, Page 145

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in