Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, MD, FRCOG, Joachim W.

Editorial Board: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, Marc J.N.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Reiss, Irwin / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

9 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.577
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.705

CiteScore 2017: 1.26

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.594
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.684

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 31, Issue 3

Issues

Accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight before induction of labor in diabetic pregnancies and pregnancies with suspected fetal macrosomia

A. Ben-Haroush / Y. Yogev / R. Mashiach / M. Hod / I. Meisner
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2003.030

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight (EFW) in diabetic pregnancies and pregnancies with suspected fetal macrosomia. Methods: 63 women with diabetic pregnancies, 74 nondiabetic women with suspected largeforgestationalage (LGA) infants, and 161 controls underwent ultrasound assessment prior to induction of labor. EFW was compared to the weight at birth, 1–3 days later. Results: EFW was highly correlated to birth weight. Absolute or actual weight differences between the birth weight and the EFW, and the rate of EFW within 10% of birth weight were not different between the groups.A linear regression model controlling for maternal and gestational age, diagnosis of gestational or pregestational diabetes, birth weight, gravidity, parity, nulliparity, placental location and AFI was not significantly correlated to the absolute or actual weight differences. In pregnancies with suspected LGA, higher birth weight was an independent and significant predictor of high weight difference inaccuracy. Conclusions: The ultrasonographic EFW 1–3 days before delivery is highly correlated with birth weight, reaffirming the clinical use of abdominal circumference and femur length in estimating fetal weight near labor at term. In pregnancies with suspected LGA fetuses and higher prevalence of macrosomia, ultrasound has higher sensitivity but lower specificity than the controls.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 2003-05-14


Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 225–230, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2003.030.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Raziah Dehghani Firoozabadi, Nasrin Ghasemi, and Mehdi Dehghani Firoozabadi
Annals of Saudi Medicine, 2007, Volume 27, Number 3, Page 179
[2]
Yair J. Blumenfeld, Henry C. Lee, Kristin M. Pullen, Amy E. Wong, Kate Pettit, and M. Mark Taslimi
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2010, Volume 23, Number 8, Page 790
[3]
Christina M. Scifres, Maisa Feghali, Tina Dumont, Andrew D. Althouse, Paul Speer, Steve N. Caritis, and Janet M. Catov
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015, Volume 126, Number 5, Page 978
[4]
GL Malin, GJ Bugg, Y Takwoingi, JG Thornton, and NW Jones
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2016, Volume 123, Number 1, Page 77
[5]
Rachelle A. Schwartz, Lisa E. Simmonds, and Barak Rosenn
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2016, Volume 29, Number 1, Page 8
[6]
Farideh Dadkhah, Maryam Kashanian, Zahra Bonyad, and Tahereh Larijani
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2013, Volume 39, Number 1, Page 170
[7]
A. Vivet-Lefébure, H. Roman, P.-Y. Robillard, A. Laffitte, T.C. Hulsey, G. Camp, L. Marpeau, and G. Barau
Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 2007, Volume 35, Number 6, Page 530
[8]
Avi Ben-Haroush, Hagit Glickman, Yariv Yogev, Boris Kaplan, Dov Feldberg, and Moshe Hod
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2004, Volume 116, Number 2, Page 182
[9]
Suneet P. Chauhan, William A. Grobman, Robert A. Gherman, Vidya B. Chauhan, Gene Chang, Everett F. Magann, and Nancy W. Hendrix
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005, Volume 193, Number 2, Page 332
[10]
G. Lindell and K. Maršál
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009, Volume 33, Number 3, Page 295
[11]
E. Peregrine, P. O'Brien, and E. Jauniaux
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007, Volume 29, Number 3, Page 304
[12]
Prenatal Diagnosis, 2003, Volume 23, Number 9, Page 772

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in