Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Milner, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, Marc J.N.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

9 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.577
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.705

CiteScore 2016: 1.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.829
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.808

See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 33, Issue 4 (Jul 2005)


Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound

Petra Klemm
  • Department of Gynecology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
/ Christhardt Koehler
  • Department of Gynecology, Charite, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
/ Mandy Mangler
  • Department of Gynecology, Charite, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
/ Uwe Schneider
  • Department of Gynecology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
/ Achim Schneider
  • Department of Gynecology, Charite, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany


Introduction and Objective: Cesarean section (CS) is the most common operation in obstetrics, with rising incidence in most countries. As a result of this operation late scar dehiscence may occur, which may lead to uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy. In this case series we have described sonographic detection of scar dehiscence after CS and feasibility of vaginal or combined laparoscopic and vaginal scar excision and uterine repair.

Methods: Five consecutive patients underwent vaginal or laparoscopic assisted vaginal approach for repair of suspected scar dehiscence following CS, during a 5 year period. In all cases, transvaginal sonography detected suspicious features of scar dehiscence over the anterior uterine wall. Except of one, all patients had reported recurrent pelvic pain and/or irregular menstrual bleedings. Furthermore all patients planned for a further pregnancy.

Results: Resection of the uterine defect and re-constitution of the uterine wall was successfully achieved in all five patients. There were no intra-operative complications and none of the patients required blood transfusion. The mean operation time was 117 min (27–192). Presence of scar tissue was confirmed on histology in all specimens. Four patients remained free of symptoms with no evidence of recurrent scar dehiscence on sonography over a median follow up of 30 months (3–46). One patient had an uneventful pregnancy 24 months after scar removal and was delivered by repeat CS at 39 weeks' gestation.

Conclusion: Patients with a history of CS should undergo transvaginal sonography of the scar region in order to detect latent scar dehiscence in combination with uterine wall thinning prior to planning further pregnancy. In suspected cases, a combined laparoscopic – vaginal or vaginal approach can be employed to repair the defect.

Keywords: Scar dehiscence; cesarean section; sonographic detection; laparoscopic-vaginal treatment; uterine rupture

About the article

Corresponding author: Achim Schneider MD, MPH Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Gynecology, 12200 Berlin, Germany, Tel.: +49-30-84452591 Fax: +49-30-84454477,

Received: December 18, 2004

Revised: January 28, 2005

Accepted: April 1, 2005

Published in Print: 2005-07-01

Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2005.058.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Cuilan Li, Shiyan Tang, Xingcheng Gao, Wanping Lin, Dong Han, Jinguo Zhai, Xuetang Mo, and Lee Jaden Gil Yu Kang Zhou
BioMed Research International, 2016, Volume 2016, Page 1
Huihui Chen, Min Yao, Jie Tao, and Xipeng Wang
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, 2015
Ghada M. Mansour, Sherif F. El-Mekkawi, Hassan T. Khairy, and Asmaa E. M. Mossad
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2015, Volume 28, Number 8, Page 944
S. Y. Han, K. J. Ryu, K. H. Ahn, S. B. Cho, C. H. Lee, and S. C. Hong
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2014, Page 1
Mariam Moshiri, Sherif Osman, Puneet Bhargava, Suresh Maximin, Tracy J. Robinson, and Douglas S. Katz
Radiologic Clinics of North America, 2014, Volume 52, Number 5, Page 1117
LF van der Voet, AJ Vervoort, S Veersema, AJ BijdeVaate, HAM Brölmann, and JAF Huirne
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2014, Volume 121, Number 2, Page 145
Shogo Shigeta, Tomohisa Ugajin, Hiromitsu Yuki, and Nobuo Yaegashi
Amanda M. Tower and Gary N. Frishman
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2013, Volume 20, Number 5, Page 562
Botros Rizk, Candice P. Holliday, Sheri Owens, and Mostafa Abuzeid
Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 2013, Volume 18, Number 2, Page 67
Lu Luo, Gang Niu, Qiong Wang, Hong-zhe Xie, and Shu-zhong Yao
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2012, Volume 19, Number 4, Page 454
Rinku Sengupta Dhar and Renu Misra
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012, Volume 2012, Page 1
Ya-Ling Feng, Meng-Xiong Li, Xiao-qin Liang, and Xiao-Mao Li
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2012, Volume 19, Number 4, Page 498
Pasquale Florio, Marco Filippeschi, Irene Moncini, Elena Marra, Mario Franchini, and Giampietro Gubbini
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012, Volume 24, Number 3, Page 180
Ilan E. Timor-Tritsch and Ana Monteagudo
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012, Volume 207, Number 1, Page 14
G. Bader, A. Bititi, F. Belot, O. Limot, and A. Fauconnier
Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 2007, Volume 35, Number 5, Page 430
Erin A.S. Clark and Robert M. Silver
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011, Volume 205, Number 6, Page S2
César Diaz-Garcia, Juan Gilabert Estellés, Alicia Marzál Escrivá, Juan José Hidalgo Mora, Rafael Romaguera Torregrosa, and Javier Monleón Sancho
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2009, Volume 16, Number 6, Page 785
Robert M. Silver
Seminars in Perinatology, 2010, Volume 34, Number 4, Page 258
Olivier Donnez, Pascale Jadoul, Jean Squifflet, and Jacques Donnez
Fertility and Sterility, 2008, Volume 89, Number 4, Page 974
Qemer KHOSHNOW, John PARDEY, and Talat UPPAL
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010, Volume 50, Number 1, Page 94
C.-B. Wang, W.-W.-C. Chiu, C.-Y. Lee, Y.-L. Sun, Y.-H. Lin, and C.-J. Tseng
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009, Volume 34, Number 1, Page 85
Fu-Nan Cho
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 2008, Volume 36, Number 6, Page 381

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in