Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Milner, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, Marc J.N.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

9 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.577
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.705

CiteScore 2016: 1.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.829
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.808

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 33, Issue 6 (Dec 2005)

Issues

Isolated echogenic intracardiac foci in patients with low-risk triple screen results: assessing the risk of Trisomy 21

Nikki Koklanaris
  • Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, New York University, New York, USA
/ Ashley S. Roman
  • Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, New York University, New York, USA
/ Mary Ann Perle
  • Department of Pathology, New York University, New York, USA
/ Ana Monteagudo
  • Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, New York University, New York, USA

Abstract

Objective: While an echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF) is associated with an increased risk of trisomy 21 (T21), the magnitude of that risk remains controversial, particularly in the setting of a low-risk triple screen (TS). The objective of this study is to define the risk of T21 in patients with a low-risk TS and an isolated EIF.

Study design: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients presenting prior to 22 6/7 weeks of gestation. Patients met criteria for inclusion if an EIF was noted, a TS had been drawn, the anatomic survey was complete and was determined to be normal, and karyotyping or delivery occurred at Bellevue Hospital. A high-risk TS was defined as a risk of <1:500, assuming a 2-fold increased risk in the setting of an isolated EIF. A low-risk TS was defined as a risk of >1:500. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square, with p values of <0.05 considered significant.

Results: 7,318 anatomic surveys were performed. An EIF was identified in 584 patients (7.98%), of which 391 met the criteria for inclusion. Of the 391, 51% were Asian and 38% were Hispanic; 348 had a low-risk TS and 43 had a high-risk TS. Patients with an EIF and a low-risk TS had a significantly lower risk of having a T21 pregnancy compared to those with a high-risk TS and an EIF (0 vs. 2.3%; p=0.004).

Conclusion: An isolated EIF with a low risk TS is not associated with an increased risk of T21.

References

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10

  • 11

  • 12

  • 13

  • 14

  • 15

About the article

Corresponding author: Nikki Koklanaris, MD NYU School of Medicine 530 First Avenue Suite 9NB-26A New York, NY, 10016 Tel.: +1-212-263-8122 Fax: +1-212-263-7890


Received: July 15, 2005

Accepted: August 9, 2005

Published in Print: 2005-12-01



Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2005.096. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Jaime L. Natoli, Deborah L. Ackerman, Suzanne McDermott, and Janice G. Edwards
Prenatal Diagnosis, 2012, Volume 32, Number 2, Page 142
[2]
Mary Carolan and Ellen Hodnett
Midwifery, 2009, Volume 25, Number 6, Page 654
[3]
Alexander M. Friedman, Colin K. L. Phoon, Shira Fishman, David E. Seubert, Ilan E. Timor-Tritsch, and Nadav Schwartz
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, Volume 118, Number 4, Page 921
[4]
G. R. DeVore
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010, Volume 35, Number 5, Page 509
[5]
Brooke T. Davey, David E. Seubert, and Colin K. L. Phoon
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2009, Volume 64, Number 6, Page 405

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in