Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Milner, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, Marc J.N.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Ogata, Edward / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

9 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.798
Rank 46 out of 120 in category Pediatrics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.731
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.687
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 1.483

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue

Issues

Intrapartum cardiotocography – the dilemma of interpretational variation

Outi Palomäki
  • Department of Obstetrics, Tampere University Hospital, Finland
/ Tiina Luukkaala
  • Department of Obstetrics, Tampere University Hospital, Finland
/ Riikka Luoto
  • Department of Obstetrics, Tampere University Hospital, Finland
/ Risto Tuimala
  • Department of Obstetrics, Tampere University Hospital, Finland
Published Online: 2006-07-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2006.057

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare interobserver variation in interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocograms.

Subjects: Fifteen senior (experience >4 years) and 16 junior (experience ≤4 years) obstetricians from 10 delivery units.

Design: Thirty-one obstetricians interpreted intrapartum cardiotocographic (CTG) readings from 22 parturients.

Methods: Inter-observer agreement in CTG interpretation and decision-making was assessed via proportions of agreement (Pa), with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Main outcome measures: The level of inter-observer agreement was analyzed by calculating Pa values for CTG baseline, variability, early, variable and late decelerations, uterine tonus, power of contractions, hypertonus and clinical decision.

Results: In assessments of normal cases the Pa were acceptable or good (0.63–0.82) as regards all CTG interpretation elements except for the power of contractions (0.24), but in assessments of abnormal cases the Pa values were lower (0.18–0.60). As regards clinical decisions, a higher Pa was found in cases without recommendation for intervention (0.63, 95% CI 0.62–0.64) than in cases with such recommendation (0.55, 95% CI 0.54–0.56). The Pa in the abnormal cases was better among senior than among junior obstetricians.

Conclusions: Inter-observer variation in interpretation of abnormal CTG readings and recommendations for intervention is relatively wide. To improve reliability, uniform classification and standardized training in CTG interpretation are needed, as well as increased use of computerized CTG.

Keywords: Cardiotocography; description; interobserver agreement; interpretation; intrapartum; labor

Corresponding author: Outi Palomäki, MD, PhD Senior Consultant Tampere University Hospital Department of Obstetrics Teiskontie 35 33521 Tampere/Finland


Received: September 7, 2005

Revised: February 1, 2006

Accepted: February 3, 2006

Published Online: 2006-07-19

Published in Print: 2006-08-01


Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine. Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 298–302, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2006.057, July 2006

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Kevin Jenniskens and Patricia A. Janssen
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2015, Volume 37, Number 3, Page 207
[3]
Christine E. East, Stefan C. Kane, Mary-Ann Davey, C. Omar Kamlin, and Shaun P. Brennecke
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2015, Volume 15, Number 1
[4]
Lauren M. Bullens, Pieter J. van Runnard Heimel, M. Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt, and S. Guid Oei
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2015, Volume 70, Number 8, Page 524
[5]
Malin Holzmann, Stina Wretler, Sven Cnattingius, and Lennart Nordström
Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2015, Volume 43, Number 4
[6]
Inês Nunes and Diogo Ayres-de-Campos
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2015
[7]
Chandan Karmakar, Yoshitaka Kimura, Marimuthu Palaniswami, and Ahsan Khandoker
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2015, Volume 21, Page 43
[8]
Leon Glass
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2015, Volume 25, Number 9, Page 097603
[9]
S. Uccella, A. Cromi, G. F. Colombo, G. Bogani, J. Casarin, M. Agosti, and F. Ghezzi
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2015, Volume 35, Number 3, Page 241
[10]
Sayako Ikeda, Atsuko Okazaki, Ken Miyazaki, Kana Kihira, and Madoka Furuhashi
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2014, Volume 40, Number 5, Page 1274
[11]
Madalena D. Costa, William T. Schnettler, Célia Amorim-Costa, João Bernardes, Antónia Costa, Ary L. Goldberger, and Diogo Ayres-de-Campos
Early Human Development, 2014, Volume 90, Number 1, Page 67
[13]
S Uccella, A Cromi, GF Colombo, M Agosti, G Bogani, J Casarin, and F Ghezzi
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2012, Volume 119, Number 13, Page 1657
[14]
Hasan Ocak and Huseyin Metin Ertunc
Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, Volume 23, Number 6, Page 1583
[16]
Atsuko Sadaka, Madoka Furuhashi, Hiroji Minami, Ken Miyazaki, Kana Yoshida, and Kaoru Ishikawa
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2011, Volume 24, Number 12, Page 1465
[18]
S. Schiermeier, G. Westhof, A. Leven, H. Hatzmann, and J. Reinhard
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 2011, Volume 72, Number 3, Page 169
[19]
Julian T. Parer and Emily F. Hamilton
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010, Volume 203, Number 5, Page 451.e1
[20]
J. Spilka, V. Chudáček, M. Koucký, L. Lhotská, M. Huptych, P. Janků, G. Georgoulas, and C. Stylios
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2012, Volume 7, Number 4, Page 350
[21]
D Ayres-de-Campos, D Arteiro, C Costa-Santos, and J Bernardes
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2011, Volume 118, Number 8, Page 978
[22]
Sven Schiermeier, Joscha Reinhard, Hendrike Hatzmann, Ralf C. Zimmermann, and Gregor Westhof
Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2009, Volume 37, Number 5
[23]
Charlene E. THORNTON, Angela MAKRIS, Jane M. TOOHER, Robert F. OGLE, and Annemarie HENNESSY
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010, Volume 50, Number 5, Page 456
[24]
S Schiermeier, S Pildner von Steinburg, A Thieme, J Reinhard, M Daumer, M Scholz, W Hatzmann, and KTM Schneider
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2008, Volume 115, Number 12, Page 1557

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.