Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, Marc J.N.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Ogata, Edward / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.798
Rank 46 out of 120 in category Pediatrics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.731
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.687
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 1.483

99,00 € / $149.00 / £75.00*

See all formats and pricing


Select Volume and Issue


30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Umbilical artery pulsatility index: reliability at different sampling sites

Francesc Figueras1 / Susana Fernandez2 / Elisenda Eixarch3 / Olga Gomez4 / Josep Maria Martinez5 / Bienvenido Puerto6 / Eduard Gratacos7








Corresponding author: Francesc Figueras Retuerta, MD Obstetrics Department Hospital Clinic Sabino de Arana, 1 08034 Barcelona, Spain Tel.: +34-932275600 Fax: +34-932275605

Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine. Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 409–413, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2006.081, September 2006

Publication History

December 5, 2005
April 11, 2006
June 13, 2006
Published Online:


Objectives: To analyse the inter-observer and inter-artery reliability of the umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) at different sampling sites.

Methods: One hundred consecutive singleton pregnancies between 24 and 40 weeks were included. The PI was calculated by two independent operators from both umbilical arteries at the placental end, at a free-floating loop and at the perivesical segment. Reliability analyses were performed between observers and between arteries at each sampling site.

Results: The mean percentage of PI difference between arteries was 15.2, 14.5 and 22% at the placental end, free-loop and perivesical site, respectively. The Intraclass correlation coefficients at each site were 0.51, 0.59 and 0.67, respectively. Whereas about 20% of cases showed a percentage of PI difference between arteries greater than 20% at free-loop and placental end sites, and at the perivesical site this figure was 45%.

Conclusions: The perivesical sampling site for UA PI calculation is more reliable than at a free-floating loop, albeit without significance, and is significantly more reliable than at the placental end of the umbilical cord. Since discordances in PI between both arteries are more pronounced at the perivesical site, it seems mandatory to evaluate both arteries in this segment.

Keywords: Circulation; Doppler; fetus; placenta; reliability analysis; umbilical artery

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Sonia Balbis, Pietro Gaglioti, Tullia Todros, and Caterina Guiot
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2007, Volume 33, Number 12, Page 1895

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.