Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, MD, FRCOG, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, Marc J.N.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Reiss, Irwin / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

9 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.577
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.705

CiteScore 2016: 1.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.602
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.832

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 34, Issue 6 (Dec 2006)

Issues

Impact of fetal blood sampling on vaginal delivery and neonatal outcome in deliveries complicated by pathologic fetal heart rate: a population based cohort study

Werner Stein / Lars Hellmeyer / Björn Misselwitz / Stephan Schmidt
Published Online: 2006-12-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2006.093

Abstract

Objective: To compare the impact of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) alone vs. EFM with additional fetal blood sampling (FBS) in vaginal deliveries complicated by pathologic fetal heart rate (FHR).

Methods: All deliveries in Hesse between 1990 and 2000 were evaluated for participation in this study. Inclusion criteria comprised (1) pathologic fetal heart rate, (2) singleton pregnancy, (3) cephalic presentation, (4) vaginal delivery, and (5) gestational age at delivery of more than 35 weeks' gestation. In order to analyze the meaning of additional risk factors at birth for the effectiveness of FBS two subgroups were selected depending on the presence of additional risk factors at birth. To examine the impact of FBS in deliveries with pathologic FHR on the mode of delivery and on neonatal outcome, univariate regression analysis was performed and odds ratios (OR) and their corresponding 95% confindence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.

Results: The study population comprised 49,560 deliveries, among deliveries complicated by pathologic FHR, 26% underwent FBS. Deliveries with pathologic FHR and controlled by FBS, with no additional antepartum risk factors, were associated with an increase in spontaneous births OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.27–1.58), and in the presence of additional risk factors OR 1.24 (1.19–1.30). Short-term neonatal outcome parameters were characterized by a lower frequency of severe fetal acidosis (umbilical artery pH <7.0) OR 0.55 (0.42–0.72), and Apgar score <5 after 5 min, OR 0.71 (0.55–0.90).

Conclusion: In vaginal deliveries with pathologic FHR the use of FBS as an additional means of intrapartum fetal surveillance is associated with less vaginal operative deliveries, and with an improved short-term neonatal outcome.

Keywords: Continuous electronic fetal monitoring; fetal blood sampling; pathologic fetal heart rate; vaginal operative delivery

About the article

Corresponding author: Dr. Werner Stein Center of Gynecology and Obstetrics Georg-August-University of Goettingen Robert-Koch-Straße 40 D-37075 Goettingen Germany


Received: November 30, 2005

Revised: July 24, 2006

Accepted: July 26, 2006

Published Online: 2006-12-01

Published in Print: 2006-12-01


Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2006.093.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Edwin Chandraharan
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2016, Volume 29, Number 22, Page 3682
[2]
Sarah Rhöse, Ayesha M.F. Heinis, Frank Vandenbussche, Joris van Drongelen, and Jeroen van Dillen
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2014, Volume 93, Number 6, Page 596
[3]
B. Carbonne and A. Nguyen
Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 2008, Volume 37, Number 1, Page S65
[4]
O. Morel, F. Richard, O. Thiébaugeorges, C. Malartic, D. Clément, G. Akerman, and E. Barranger
Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 2007, Volume 35, Number 11, Page 1148
[5]
LENA LILJESTRÖM, ANNA-KARIN WIKSTRÖM, ULF HANSON, HELENA ÅKERUD, and MARIA JONSSON
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2011, Volume 90, Number 10, Page 1088
[6]
Amita A. Mahendru and Christoph C. Lees
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2011, Volume 156, Number 2, Page 137

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in