Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, MD, FRCOG, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, Marc J.N.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Reiss, Irwin / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

9 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.577
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.705

CiteScore 2016: 1.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.602
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.832

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 36, Issue 6 (Nov 2008)

Issues

Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at term in small-for-gestational age fetuses: comparison of growth velocity vs. customized assessment

Ainara Iraola / Iñaki González / Elisenda Eixarch / Eva Meler / Miriam Illa / Jason Gardosi / Eduard Gratacós / Francesc Figueras
Published Online: 2008-11-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2008.100

Abstract

Objective: To explore the ability of growth velocity and customized standards of fetal weight to predict adverse outcomes in small fetuses delivered at term.

Methods: We evaluated a cohort of 86 consecutive singletons suspected to be small for gestational age during the third trimester (estimated fetal weight <10th centile), who had normal umbilical artery Doppler and ultimately delivered at term. Conditional growth velocity and customized fetal growth were compared for the prediction of adverse outcome.

Results: Overall, customized growth assessment showed better sensitivity than growth velocity assessment (57.1% vs. 42.9% for a 10th centile cut-off) for the prediction of adverse outcome, but with comparable specificity. The odds of having an adverse outcome for women with a positive test compared with women with a negative test were 1.54 and 3.22 for the 10th centile growth velocity and customized definitions, respectively. The area under the curve for the prediction of adverse outcome was larger for customized than for growth velocity standards (0.65 vs. 0.59), albeit without statistical significance.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that customized growth assessment may have better accuracy in predicting adverse perinatal outcome than growth velocity in small fetuses with normal umbilical Doppler delivered at term.

Keywords: Conditional centiles; customized centiles; fetal growth; growth velocity; perinatal outcome

About the article

Corresponding author: Ainara Iraola Department of Obstetrics Hospital Clinic Sabino de Arana n° 1 Barcelona, Spain Tel.: +34 932275600 Fax: +34 932275605


Received: 2008-01-29

Revised: 2008-06-18

Accepted: 2008-06-23

Published Online: 2008-11-06

Published in Print: 2008-11-01


Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2008.100.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Silvia Vannuccini, Christos Ioannou, Angelo Cavallaro, Grazia Volpe, Sara Ruiz-Martinez, and Lawrence Impey
Prenatal Diagnosis, 2017
[2]
Teresa M. MacDonald, Lisa Hui, Stephen Tong, Alice J. Robinson, Kirsten M. Dane, Anna L. Middleton, and Susan P. Walker
BMC Medicine, 2017, Volume 15, Number 1
[3]
Asma Khalil, José Morales-Rosello, Naila Khan, Mintu Nath, Priya Agarwal, Amar Bhide, Aris Papageorghiou, and Basky Thilaganathan
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017, Volume 216, Number 6, Page 606.e1
[4]
Adi L. Tarca, Edgar Hernandez-Andrade, Hyunyoung Ahn, Maynor Garcia, Zhonghui Xu, Steven J. Korzeniewski, Homam Saker, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, Sonia S. Hassan, Lami Yeo, Roberto Romero, and Irina Burd
PLOS ONE, 2016, Volume 11, Number 11, Page e0164161
[5]
Nadia Bardien, Clare L. Whitehead, Stephen Tong, Antony Ugoni, Susan McDonald, Susan P. Walker, and Victor Sanchez-Margalet
PLOS ONE, 2016, Volume 11, Number 1, Page e0142788
[6]
Alison M. Fung, Danielle L. Wilson, Martha Lappas, Mark Howard, Maree Barnes, Fergal O'Donoghue, Stephen Tong, Helen Esdale, Gabrielle Fleming, Susan P. Walker, and Martin Gerbert Frasch
PLoS ONE, 2013, Volume 8, Number 7, Page e68057
[7]
Tullio Ghi, Luisa Cariello, Ludovica Rizzo, Enrico Ferrazzi, Enrico Periti, Federico Prefumo, Tamara Stampalija, Elsa Viora, Carla Verrotti, and Giuseppe Rizzo
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2016, Volume 35, Number 1, Page 83
[8]
H. O. Karlsen, S. L. Johnsen, S. Rasmussen, and T. Kiserud
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, Volume 48, Number 2, Page 217
[9]
Teresa M. MacDonald, Elizabeth A. McCarthy, and Susan P. Walker
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2015, Volume 55, Number 1, Page 3
[10]
Russell L. Deter, Wesley Lee, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Adi L. Tarca, Lami Yeo, and Roberto Romero
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2015, Volume 28, Number 7, Page 745
[11]
Russell L. Deter, Wesley Lee, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Adi L. Tarca, Lami Yeo, and Roberto Romero
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2015, Volume 28, Number 7, Page 755
[13]
A. Ego
Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 2013, Volume 42, Number 8, Page 872
[14]
Tulika Singh, Karin Leslie, Amar Bhide, Francesco DʼAntonio, and Basky Thilaganathan
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012, Volume 119, Number 2, Part 1, Page 256
[15]
Torvid Kiserud and Synnøve Lian Johnsen
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2009, Volume 23, Number 6, Page 819
[16]
Jason Gardosi, Francesc Figueras, Britt Clausson, and Andre Francis
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2011, Volume 25, Number 1, Page 2

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in