Abstract
Aim: To perform a systematic review to assess the accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound (US) in the diagnoses of major structural malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses.
Methods: References were obtained from the MEDLINE database, without time range limitations. For each, the risk of bias was evaluated and the important data were extracted. Only studies that used first-trimester US to diagnose major structural malformations were included. We evaluated the sensitivity of US over a low-risk unselected population of pregnant women carrying euploid fetuses.
Results: A total of 19 studies were included, contributing to 126,937 fetuses and 1399 major malformations. The prevalence of lethal and severe malformations obtained was 1.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0–1.4]. Both averaged and pooled sensitivity, 50.0% (95% CI 44.1–55.9) and 45.2%, respectively, presented a moderate value for first-trimester US in the detection of structural malformations.
Conclusion: Based on our analysis of the data, the average sensitivity of first-trimester US to detect structural malformations was 50%. It is our conviction that US has the potential to evolve in this role by exploiting the natural history of malformations and the development of US techniques.
Acknowledgments
We thank Catarina Pedrosa for her contribution in reviewing the inclusion/exclusion criteria and bias criteria.
References
[1] Abu-Rustum RS, Daou L, Abu-Rustum SE. Role of first-trimester sonography in the diagnosis of aneuploidy and structural fetal anomalies. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1445–52.10.7863/jum.2010.29.10.1445Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Achiron R, Tadmor O. Screening for fetal anomalies during the first trimester pregnancy: transvaginal versus transabdominal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991;1:186–91.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1991.01030186.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Becker R, Wegner RD. Detailed screening for fetal anomalies and cardiac defects at the 11–13-week scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:613–8.10.1002/uog.2709Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Bellotti M, Fesslova V, De Gasperi C, Rognoni G, Bee V, Zucca I, et al. Reliability of the first-trimester cardiac scan by ultrasound-trained obstetricians with high-frequency transabdominal probes in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:272–8.10.1002/uog.7685Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] Borrell A, Robinson NJ, Forgas-Santolaya J. Clinical value of the 11- to 13+6-week sonogram for detection of congenital malformations: a review. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28:117–24.10.1055/s-0030-1263302Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Carvalho MHB, Brizot ML, Lopes LM, Chiba CH, Miyadahira S, Zugaib M. Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11–14 week ultrasound scan. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:1–4.10.1002/pd.200Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] Cedergren M, Selbing A. Detection of fetal structural abnormalities by an 11–14-week ultrasound dating in an unselected Swedish population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:912–5.10.1080/00016340500448438Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Chaoui R, Benoit B, Heling KS, Kagan KO, Pietzsch V, Lopez AS, et al. Prospective detection of open spina bifida at 11–13 weeks by assessing intracranial translucency and posterior brain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:722–6.10.1002/uog.10111Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Chaoui R, Nicolaides KH. From nuchal translucency to intracranial translucency: towards the early detection of spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:133–8.10.1002/uog.7552Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Chen M, Lam YH, Lee CP, Tang HY. Ultrasound screening of fetal structural abnormalities at 12 to 14 weeks in Hong Kong. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24:92–7.10.1002/pd.798Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Chen M, Lee CP, Lam YH, Tang RYK, Chan BCP, Wong SF, et al. Comparison of nuchal and detailed morphology ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy for fetal structural abnormality screening: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:136–46.10.1002/uog.5232Search in Google Scholar
[12] Dane B, Dane C, Sivri D, Kiray M, Cetin A, Yayla M. Ultrasound screening for fetal major abnormalities at 11–14 weeks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:666–70.10.1080/00016340701253405Search in Google Scholar
[13] Ebrashy A, El Kateb A, Momtaz M, El Skeikhah A, Aboulghar MM, Ibrahim M, et al. 13–14-week fetal anatomy: a 5-year prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:292–6.10.1002/uog.7444Search in Google Scholar
[14] Economides DL, Braithwaite JM. First trimester ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:53–7.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09350.xSearch in Google Scholar
[15] Economides DL, Whitlow BJ, Braithwaite JM. Ultrasonography in the detection of fetal anomalies in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:516–23.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08317.xSearch in Google Scholar
[16] EUROCAT Guide 1.3 and reference documents. Instructions for the Registration and Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies. http://www.eurocat-network.eu/content/EUROCAT-Guide-1.3.pdf. 26 Nov 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[17] Fetal Medicine Foundation. http://www.fetalmedicine.com/fmf/. Accessed on 17 Dec 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[18] Grande M, Arigita M, Borobio V, Jimenez JM, Fernandez S, Borrell A. First-trimester detection of structural abnormalities and the role of aneuploidy markers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:157–63.10.1002/uog.10070Search in Google Scholar
[19] Hafner E, Schuchter K, Liebhart E, Philipp K. Results of routine fetal nuchal translucency measurement at weeks 10–13 in 4233 unselected pregnant women. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18: 29–34.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199801)18:1<29::AID-PD213>3.0.CO;2-NSearch in Google Scholar
[20] Hernádi L, Töröcsik M. Screening for fetal anomalies in the 12th week of pregnancy by transvaginal sonography in an unselected population. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17:753–9.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199708)17:8<753::AID-PD148>3.0.CO;2-PSearch in Google Scholar
[21] Hildebrand E, Selbing A, Blomberg M. Comparison of first and second trimester ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies in the southeast region of Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;Early Online:1412–9.10.3109/00016349.2010.517307Search in Google Scholar
[22] Johnson SP, Sebire NJ, Snijders RJM, Tunkel S, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound screening for anencephaly at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:14–6.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09010014.xSearch in Google Scholar
[23] Levi S, Hyjazi Y, Schaaps JP, Defoort P, Coulon R, Buekens P. Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: the Belgian multicentric study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991;1:102–10.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1991.01020102.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, GØtzsche PC, Ionnidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Br Med J. 2009. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2700.10.1136/bmj.b2700Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[25] Makrydimas G, Sotiriadis A, Huggon IC, Simpson J, Sharland G, Carvalho JS, et al. Nuchal translucency and fetal cardiac defects: a pooled analysis of major fetal echocardiography centers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:89–95.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.081Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] Merks JHM, Karnebeek CD, Caron HN, Hennekam RC. Phenotypic abnormalities: terminology and classification. Am J Med Genet. 2003;123:211–30.10.1002/ajmg.a.20249Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[27] Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, Mansur C, Marks K. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J. 1992;304: 867–9.10.1136/bmj.304.6831.867Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[28] Öztekin Ö, Öztekin D, Tinar S, Adibelli. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities in prenatal screening at 11–14 weeks. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2009;15:221–5.Search in Google Scholar
[29] Pedrosa AC, Matias A. Screening for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review of tests combining uterine artery Doppler with other markers. J Perinat Med. 2011;39:619–35.Search in Google Scholar
[30] Pérez-Pedregosa J, Burgos MBA, Martínez-Ten P. First trimester fetal echocardiography: state of the problem. Timisoara Med J. 2009;59:173–83.Search in Google Scholar
[31] Rice KJ, Ballas J, Lai E, Hartney C, Jones MC, Pretorius DH. Diagnosis of fetal limb abnormalities before 15 weeks. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:1009–19.10.7863/jum.2011.30.7.1009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[32] Saltvedt A, Almström H, Kublickas M, Grunwald C. Detection of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses by routine ultrasound at 12 or 18 weeks of gestation—a randomized controlled trial in 39 772 pregnancies. Br J Gynecol. 2006;113:664–74.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00953.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[33] Smith CN, Hau C. A six year study of the antenatal detection of fetal abnormality in six Scottish health boards. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:206–12.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08232.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[34] Souka AP, Pilalis A, Kavalakis I, Antsaklis P, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, et al. Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11- to 14-week ultrasound scan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:393–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[35] Syngelaki A, Chelemen T, Dagklis T, Allan L, Nicolaides KH. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:90–102.10.1002/pd.2642Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[36] Timor-Tritsch IE, Bashiri A, Monteagudo A, Arsian AA. Qualified and trained sonographers in the US can perform early fetal anatomy scans between 11 and 14 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1247–52.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[37] Weiner Z, Goldstein I, Bombard A, Applewhite L, Itzkovits-Eldor J. Screening for structural fetal anomalies during the nuchal translucency ultrasound examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:181.e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.057Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[38] Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. Epub 2003 Nov 10.10.1186/1471-2288-3-25Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[39] Whitlow BJ, Chatzipapas IK, Lazanakis ML, Kadir RA, Economides DL. The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:929–36.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08432.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston