Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 24, 2015

Are there anamnestic risk factors for iron deficiency in pregnancy? Results from a feasibility study

  • Wolf Kirschner EMAIL logo , Joachim W. Dudenhausen and Wolfgang Henrich

Abstract

The conditions of iron deficiency are highly incident in pregnancy with elevated risks for preterm birth and low birth weight. In our recent study, we found 6% of participants having anemia, whereas between 39% and 47% showed iron deficiency without anemia. In many countries in prenatal care solely hemoglobin (Hb) measurement is applied. For the gynecologists till date there is no indication to determine other markers (e.g., serum-ferritin). As iron deficiency results from an imbalance between intake and loss of iron, our aim was to find out if the risk of iron deficiency conditions can be estimated by a diet history protocol as well as questionnaires to find about iron loss. We found that the risk of having iron deficiency in upper gestational week (>=21) increased by a factor of five. Thus, additional diagnostics should be done in this group by now. Using the questionnaire as a screening instrument, we further estimated the probability of disease in terms of a positive likelihood ratio (LR+). The positive LR for the group below 21th week of gestation is 1.9 thus, increasing the post-test probability to 52% from 36% as before. Further research based on higher sample sizes will show if the ratios can be increased further.

References

[1] National Obesity Observatory, Dietary Surveillance and Nutritional Assessment in England: What is measured and where are the gaps?, March 2010. Available at: http://www.noo.org.uk/uploads/doc/vid_5191_Dietary_Surveillance_and_Nutritional_Assessment_in_England.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kirschner W, Friese K, Dudenhausen JW. Eisenmangel in der Schwangerschaft. Der Gynäkologe. 2011;44:759–66.10.1007/s00129-011-2841-4Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kirschner W, Friese K. Strategies in the prevention of preterm births during and before pregnancy. In: Morrison JC, editor. Preterm birth. Mother and child. InTech Europe, Croatia: Intec Publications; 2011. p. 245–62.10.5772/28484Search in Google Scholar

[4] Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 2, likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice. Acta Paediatrica. 2006;96:487–91.10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00179.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Caraguel CGB, Vanderstichel R. The two step Fagans’s monogram: ad hoc interpretation of a diagnostic test result without calculation. Evid Based Med. 2013;18:125–8.10.1136/eb-2013-101243Search in Google Scholar PubMed

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2014-9-15
Accepted: 2015-1-12
Published Online: 2015-3-24
Published in Print: 2016-4-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2014-0308/html
Scroll to top button