Hindryckx A, De Catte L. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital renal and urinary tract malformations. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3:165–74.Google Scholar
Clayton DB, Brock JW 3rd. In utero intervention for urologic diseases. Nature Rev Urol. 2012;9:207–17.Google Scholar
Wiesel A, Queisser-Luft A, Clementi M, Bianca S, Stoll C. Prenatal detection of congenital renal malformations by fetal ultrasonographic examination: an analysis of 709,030 births in 12 European countries. Eur J Med Genet. 2005;48:131–44.Google Scholar
Langer JC. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. What can and should be done? Can Fam Physician. 1993;39:595–602.Google Scholar
Wilkinson D, de Crespigny L, Xafis V. Ethical language and decision-making for prenatally diagnosed lethal malformations. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:306–11.Google Scholar
Perez-Brayfield MR, Kirsch AJ, Smith EA. Monoamniotic twin discordant for bilateral renal agenesis with normal pulmonary function. Urology 2004;64:589.e1–e2.Google Scholar
Bienstock JL, Birsner ML, Coleman F, Hueppchen NA. Successful in utero intervention for bilateral renal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:413–5.Google Scholar
Song KM. Survival of Rep. Herrera Beutler’s child a celebrated case study. Seattle, Washington: The Seattle Times; 2014.Google Scholar
Slickers JE, Olshan AF, Siega-Riz AM, Honein MA, Aylsworth AS. Maternal body mass index and lifestyle exposures and the risk of bilateral renal agenesis or hypoplasia: the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:1259–67.Google Scholar
Davis EM, Peck JD, Thompson D, Wild RA, Langlois P. Maternal diabetes and renal agenesis/dysgenesis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Molec Teratol. 2010;88:722–7.Google Scholar
Wang Y, Hu J, Druschel CM, Kirby RS. Twenty-five-year survival of children with birth defects in New York State: a population-based study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Molec Teratol. 2011;91:995–1003.Google Scholar
Robbins JM, Bird TM, Tilford JM, Cleves MA, et al. Hospital stays, hospital charges, and in-hospital deaths among infants with selected birth defects–United States, 2003. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:25–9.Google Scholar
Mehler K, Beck BB, Kaul I, Rahimi G, Hoppe B, Kribs A. Respiratory and general outcome in neonates with renal oligohydramnios – a single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:3514–22.Google Scholar
Melo BF, Aguiar MB, Bouzada MC, Aguiar RL, Pereira AK, Paixao GM, et al. Early risk factors for neonatal mortality in CAKUT: analysis of 524 affected newborns. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27:965–72.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Grijseels EW, van-Hornstra PT, Govaerts LC, Cohen-Overbeek TE, de Krijger RR, Smit BJ, et al. Outcome of pregnancies complicated by oligohydramnios or anhydramnios of renal origin. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:1039–45.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Spiro JE, Konrad M, Rieger-Fackeldey E, Masjosthusmann K, Amler S, Klockenbusch W, et al. Renal oligo- and anhydramnios: cause, course and outcome-a single-center study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:327–36.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Damen-Elias HA, De Jong TP, Stigter RH, Visser GH, Stoutenbeek PH. Congenital renal tract anomalies: outcome and follow-up of 402 cases detected antenatally between 1986 and 2001. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:134–43.Google Scholar
Ulkumen BA, Pala HG, Baytur YB, Koyuncu FM. Outcomes and management strategies in pregnancies with early onset oligohydramnios. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42:355–7.Google Scholar
Nagase H, Ishikawa H, Nishikawa T, Kurosawa K, Itani Y, Yamanaka M. Prenatal management of the fetus with lethal malformation: from a study of oligohydramnios sequence. Fetal Pediat Pathol. 2011;30:145–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garne E, Loane M, Dolk H, Barisic I, Addor MC, Arriola L, et al. Spectrum of congenital anomalies in pregnancies with pregestational diabetes. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94:134–40.Google Scholar
Cameron D, Lupton BA, Farquharson D, Hiruki T. Amnioinfusions in renal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:872–6.Google Scholar
Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Brent RL. The professional responsibility model of obstetrical ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:315.e1–5.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Babbitt KE, Bailey KJ, Coverdale JH, Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Professionally responsible intrapartum management of patients with major mental disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:27–31.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The professional responsibility model of perinatal ethics. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruter GmbH; 2014.Google Scholar
Scott JE. Fetal, perinatal, and infant death with congenital renal anomaly. Archiv Dis Child. 2002;87:114–7.Google Scholar
Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. A comprehensive ethical framework for fetal research and its application to fetal surgery for spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:10–4.Google Scholar
Biffl WL, Spain DA, Reitsma AM, Minter RM, Upperman J, Wilson M, et al. Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: a position statement of the Society of University Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:1204–9.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2017-02-21
Published in Print: 2017-07-26
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.
Funding source: Neonatology Evangelina “Evie” Whitlock Award, Texas Children’s Hospital Neonatology “Bad Pants” Fund, and NIH grant K23HD076938; the sponsors had no involvement in study design or in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data.
Clinical trials registration: Not applicable.