Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, MD, FRCOG, Joachim W.

Ed. by Bancalari, Eduardo / Chappelle, Joseph / Chervenak, Frank A. / D'Addario , Vincenzo / Genc, Mehmet R. / Greenough, Anne / Grunebaum, Amos / Konje, Justin C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Romero, Roberto / Zalud, MD PhD, Ivica


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.558
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.653

CiteScore 2017: 1.26

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.594
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.684

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 46, Issue 4

Issues

Animatio: a history of ideas on the beginning of personhood

Michael Obladen
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Neonatology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-03-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0404

Abstract

The onset of individual human life has fascinated thinkers of all cultures and epochs, and the history of their ideas may enlighten an unsettled debate. Aristotle attributed three different souls to the subsequent developmental stages. The last, the rational soul, was associated with the formed fetus, and entailed fetal movements. With some modifications, the concept of delayed ensoulment – at 30, 42, 60, or 90 days after conception – was adopted by several Christian Church Fathers and remained valid throughout the Middle Ages. The concept of immediate ensoulment at fertilization originated in the 15th century and became Catholic dogma in 1869. During the Enlightenment, philosophers began to replace the rational soul with the term personhood, basing the latter on self-consciousness. Biological reality suggests that personhood accrues slowly, not at a specific date during gestation. Requirements for personhood are present in the embryo, but not in the preembryo before implantation: anatomic substrate; no more totipotent cells; decreased rate of spontaneous loss. However, biological facts alone cannot determine the embryo’s moral status. Societies must negotiate and decide the degree of protection of unborn humans. In the 21st century, fertilization, implantation, extrauterine viability and birth have become the most widely accepted landmarks of change in ontological status.

Keywords: Embryogenesis; ensoulment; ethics; fetal life; fetus; history; human; personhood

References

  • [1]

    Noonan JT. An almost absolute value in history. In: Noonan JT, editor. The morality of abortion. Legal and historical perspectives. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 1970. p. 1–59.Google Scholar

  • [2]

    Ford NM. When did I begin? conception of the human individual in history, philosophy and science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p. 85.Google Scholar

  • [3]

    Blackman AM. The pharaoh’s placenta and the moon-god Khons. J Egyptian Archaeol. 1916;3:235–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Seligmann CG, Murray MA. Note upon an early Egyptian standard. Man. 1911;11:165–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Breasted JH. Akhenaton’s hymn to Aton. In: Gressmann H, editor. Cambridge ancient history: Vol 2. The Egyptian and Hittite empires to 1000 B.C. Cambridge: University Press; 1925. p. 118.Google Scholar

  • [6]

    Lipner JJ. The classical hindu view on abortion and the moral status of the unborn. In: Coward HG, Lipner JJ, Young KK, editors. Hindu ethics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1989. p. 41–69.Google Scholar

  • [7]

    Keown D. Buddhism and bioethics. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1995. p. 72–93.Google Scholar

  • [8]

    Harper DJ. MSV Taichan shu: Book of the generation of the fetus. Early Chinese medical literature. London: Routledge; 2009. p. 372–84.Google Scholar

  • [9]

    Lonie IM. The Hippocratic treatises “On generation”, “On the nature of the child”, “Diaseases IV”: a commentary. Ars medica 2:7. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter; 1981. p. 7–9, 13–19.Google Scholar

  • [10]

    Hashimoto R. Development of the human tail bud and splanchnic mesenchyme. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2013;53:27–33.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Plato. The Republic, Book IV. Translated by: Paul Shorey: Loeb Classical Library 237. London: Heinemann; 1988. p. 403.Google Scholar

  • [12]

    Aristotle. De generatione animalium/Generation of animals. translated by: A.L. Peck: The Loeb Classical Library vol. 366. ed. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; 1942. Vol. Book 2,4.Google Scholar

  • [13]

    Aristotle. Historia animalium, Book VII. engl. translation by D. M. Balme: The Loeb Classical Library LCL 439. London/Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; 1991. Vol. VII, p. p 183=583b2-5.Google Scholar

  • [14]

    Lucretius Carus T. Of the nature of things (De natura rerum). A metrical translation by WE Leonard: London, Paris, Toronto: J. M. Dent; 1916. p. 104.Google Scholar

  • [15]

    Singer C. The discovery of the circulation of the blood. London: G. Bell and Sons; 1922. p. 9.Google Scholar

  • [16]

    Singer C. Galen as a modern. Proc R Soc Med. 1949;42: 563–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Galen. Über die Ausformung der Keimlinge (de foetuum formatione liber). übersetzt und erläutert von D. Nickel: Corpus medicorum Graecorum 5.3.3. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag; 2001. p. 97–98.Google Scholar

  • [18]

    Tertullianus QSF. A treatise on the Soul. In: Alexander Roberts: The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. III: Latin Christianity. Reprinted from ed. 1885. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson; 1995. p. 374, 394.Google Scholar

  • [19]

    Lactantius LCF. De opificio Dei (304 CE). In: Migne JP, editor. Patrologiae Latinae Cursus Completus. Parisiis: Vrayet; 1844. Vol. 7, cap. 12, col. 69, 55.Google Scholar

  • [20]

    Sancti Aurelii Augustini. Quaestionum in Heptateuchum libri 7 (ca. 400 CE). In: Migne J-P: Patrologiae Latinae cursus completus. Paris: apud editorem; 1845. Vol. 34, col. 626.Google Scholar

  • [21]

    Sancti Aurelii Augustini. Enchiridion ad Laurentium, sive de fide, spe et charitate (ca. 400 CE). In: Migne J-P: Patrologiae Latinae cursus completus. Paris: apud editorem; 1841. Vol. 6, col. 272.Google Scholar

  • [22]

    Anselmi Cantuariensis. De conceptu virginali et originali peccato. In: Gabriel Gerberon Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia Venetiis Joseph Corona 1744 1 147Google Scholar

  • [23]

    Sanctae Hildegardis. Scivias, sive visionum ac revelationum libri tres. In: Migne J-P: Patrologiae cursus completus. Paris: Migne; 1855. Vol. 197, col. 413–7.Google Scholar

  • [24]

    Hildegard von Bingen. Liber Scivias Dei. Vision I.4. Rupertsberg “Scivias” Codex. Rupertsberg: Benediktinerinnenabtei St. Hildegard, 1147; Fol 22.Google Scholar

  • [25]

    Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae, pars I, qu. 118: Human reproduction with respect to the soul. Latin text and English translation: Cambridge: Blackfriars; 1970. Vol. 15, p. 146–54.Google Scholar

  • [26]

    Thomas Aquinas. Summa contra gentiles. Book 2: Creation. Notre Dame, London, New York: University of Notre Dame Press; 1975. p. 300–1.Google Scholar

  • [27]

    Tanner NP. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1990. p. 360, 528, 666.Google Scholar

  • [28]

    Obladen M. From sin to crime: Laws on infanticide in the Middle Ages. Neonatology 2016;109:85–90.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]

    Pius V. Pont. Max.: Catechismus Romanus, ex decreto Concilii Tridentini. Lugduni: Apud Guliel. Rovilium; 1567. Vol. Pars I, p. 36.Google Scholar

  • [30]

    Zacchia P. Quaestionum medico-legalium (1st ed. 1621). 4. ed. Avenione: Joannis Piot; 1655. Vol. Tit. 2, quaest. 9, p. 56–8.Google Scholar

  • [31]

    Cangiamila FE. Embryologia sacra sive de officio sacerdotum, medicorum, et aliorum circa aeternam parvulorum in utero existentium salutem (1st ed. Milan 1745). ed. tertia. ed. Augustae Vindelicorum: Joannis Jacobi Mauracher; 1765. p. 70, 136.Google Scholar

  • [32]

    Haller A. Elementa physiologiae corporis humani. Lugduni Batavorum: Cornel. Haak; 1766. Vol. 8: Fetus hominisque vita, p. 334 .Google Scholar

  • [33]

    Gury JP. Compendium Theologiae Moralis. 2. ed. Ratisbonae: Sumpt. G. Josephi Manz; 1857. p. 114.Google Scholar

  • [34]

    Pius XI Papa. Constitutio Apostolicae Sedis moderationi . In: Acta Sanctae Sedis /Acta Pii IX 1869-70. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana; 1911. Vol. 5, p. 305–17.Google Scholar

  • [35]

    Luther M. Disputatio de homine (1536). In: Ebeling G: D. Martin Luthers Werke; kritische Gesamtausgabe. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger; 1926. Vol. 39–1, p. 174–80.Google Scholar

  • [36]

    Calvin J. Commentaries on the last four books of Moses (1545). translated by: Charles W. Bingham: Harmony of the Law. Vol 3. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans/Christians Classics Ethereal Library; 1950. p. 51–2.Google Scholar

  • [37]

    Anscombe GE, Geach PT. Descartes: philosophical writings. London: Nelsons University Paperbacks; 1975. p. 32.Google Scholar

  • [38]

    Spinoza B. Ethica, ordine geometrico demonstrata, et in quinque partes distributa. In: Opera posthuma, tract. 1. Amsterdam: [N.N.], 1677.Google Scholar

  • [39]

    Locke J. An essay concerning human understanding (1st ed. London 1690). Chapter XXVII: Of identity and diversity. 29. ed. London: Thomas Tegg; 1841. p. 217.Google Scholar

  • [40]

    Kant I. Critique of pure reason (1st ed. 1788). translated and edited by: Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood: Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 422.Google Scholar

  • [41]

    Kant I. Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft (1793). In: Wilhelm Weischedel: Immanuel Kant Werke in sechs Bänden. Wiesbaden: Insel Verlag; 1960. Vol. 4, p. 785=A170.Google Scholar

  • [42]

    Engelhardt HT. The ontology of abortion. Ethics. 1974;84:217–24.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [43]

    Tooley M. Abortion and infanticide. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1983, p. 303.Google Scholar

  • [44]

    Singer P. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p. 182.Google Scholar

  • [45]

    Sass H-M. The moral significance of brain-life criteria. In: Beller FK, Weir RF, editors. The beginning of human life. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1994. p. 57–70.Google Scholar

  • [46]

    American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Preembryo research: history, scientific background, and ethical considerations. ACOG Committee Opinion: Committee on Ethics. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1994;45:291–301.Google Scholar

  • [47]

    Habermas J. The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights. Metaphilosophy. 2010;41:464–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [48]

    Obladen M. Despising the weak: long shadows of infant murder in Nazi Germany. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;103:F190–4.Google Scholar

  • [49]

    Janvier A, Leblanc I, Barrington KJ. Nobody likes premies: the relative value of patients’ lives. J Perinatol. 2008;28:821–6.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [50]

    Rager G. Die biologische Entwicklung des Menschen. In: Rager G, editor. Beginn, Personalität und Würde des Menschen. 3. ed. Freiburg, München: Alber; 2009. p. 82.Google Scholar

  • [51]

    Beller FK, Zlatnik GP. Medical aspects of the beginning of individual lives. In: Beller FK, Weir RF, editors. The beginning of human life. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1994. p. 3–16.Google Scholar

  • [52]

    Moraczewski AS. Human personhood: a study in person-alized biology. In: Bondeson WB, Engelhardt HT, Spicker SF, Winship DH, editors. Abortion and the status of the fetus. Dordrecht: D Reidel Publishers; 1983. p. 301–11.Google Scholar

  • [53]

    Lebacqz K, Mendiola MM, Peters T, Young EWD, Zoloth-Dorfman L. Research with human embryonic stem cells: ethical considerations. Hastings Cent Rep. 1999;29:31–6.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [54]

    Shannon TA, Wolter AB. Reflections on the moral status of the pre-embryo. Theol Stud. 1990;51:603–26.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [55]

    Koch-Hershenov R. Totipotency, twinning, and ensoulment at fertilization. J Med Philos. 2006;31:139–64.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [56]

    Eberl J. The beginning of personhood. A Thomistic biological analysis. Bioethics. 2000;14:134–57.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [57]

    Kuljis RO. Development of the human brain: the emergence of the neural substrate for pain perception and conscious experience. In: Beller FK, Weir RF, editors. The beginning of human life. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1994. p. 49–56.Google Scholar

  • [58]

    Donceel JF. Immediate animation and delayed hominization. Theol Stud. 1970;31:76–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [59]

    Kurjak A, Carrera JM, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Scientific and religious controversies about the beginning of human life: the relevance of the ethical concept of the fetus as a patient. J Perinat Med. 2007;35:376–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [60]

    Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Levene MI. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:3–7.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [61]

    O’Rahilly R, Muller F. Developmental stages in human embryos: revised and new measurements. Cells Tissues Organs. 2010;192:73–84.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [62]

    Burn, J. Can a cell have a soul? Br Med J. 2008;336:1132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [63]

    Mauron A. Essays on science and society. Is the genome the secular equivalent of the soul? Science. 2001;291:831–832.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Michael Obladen, Department of Neonatology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany, Tel.: +49 30 450566122, Fax: +49 30 450566922


Received: 2016-12-09

Accepted: 2017-01-30

Published Online: 2017-03-04

Published in Print: 2018-05-24


Author’s statement

Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.

Funding: The author received no funding.


Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 355–364, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0404.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in