Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, MD, FRCOG, Joachim W.

Ed. by Bancalari, Eduardo / Chappelle, Joseph / Chervenak, Frank A. / D'Addario , Vincenzo / Genc, Mehmet R. / Greenough, Anne / Grunebaum, Amos / Konje, Justin C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Romero, Roberto / Zalud, MD PhD, Ivica


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.361
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.578

CiteScore 2018: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.522
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.602

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 46, Issue 8

Issues

Neonatal resuscitation experience curves: simulation based mastery learning booster sessions and skill decay patterns among pediatric residents

Heideh H. Matterson
  • Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hackensack University Medical Center at Pascack Valley, Westwood, NJ, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Demian Szyld / Brad R. Green / Heather B. Howell / Martin V. Pusic / Pradeep V. Mally / Sean M. Bailey
  • Corresponding author
  • Division of Neonatology, New York University School of Medicine, 462 First Ave, Suite 8S15, New York, NY 10016, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-02-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2017-0330

Abstract

Background

Following neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) training, decay in clinical skills can occur. Simulation-based deliberate practice (SBDP) has been shown to maintain NRP skills to a variable extent. Our study objectives were (a) to determine whether a single 30 min simulation-based intervention that incorporates SBDP and mastery learning (ML) can effectively restore skills and prevent skill decay and (b) to compare different timing options.

Methods

Following NRP certification, pediatric residents were randomly assigned to receive a video-recorded baseline assessment plus SBDP-ML refresher education at between 6 and 9 months (early) or between 9 and 12 months (late). One year following initial certification, participants had repeat skill retention videotaped evaluations. Participants were scored by blinded NRP instructors using validated criteria scoring tools and assigned a global performance rating score (GRS).

Results

Twenty-seven participants were included. Residents in both early and late groups showed significant skill decay 7 and 10 months after initial NRP. SBDP-ML booster sessions significantly improved participants’ immediate NRP performance scores (p<0.001), which persisted for 2 months, but were again lower 4 months later.

Conclusions

NRP skills may be boosted to mastery levels after a short SBDP-ML intervention and do not appear to significantly decline after 2 months. Brief booster training could potentially serve as a useful supplement to traditional NRP training for pediatric residents.

Keywords: Mastery learning; neonatal resuscitation program; neonatology; residency training; simulation based deliberate practice

References

  • [1]

    Neonatal Resuscitation Program website. Available at: https://www.aap.org/en-us/continuing-medical-education/life-support/NRP/Pages/History.aspx. Accessed 7 July 2017.

  • [2]

    Ergenekon E, Koc E, Atalay Y, Soysal O. Neonatal resuscitation course experience in Turkey. Resuscitation. 2000;45:225–7.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Skidmore M, Urquhart H. Retention of skills in neonatal resuscitation. Paediatr Child Health 2001;6:31–5.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Levitt C, Kaczorowski J, Outerbridge E, Jimenez V, Connolly B, Slapcoff B. Knowledge gained following neonatal resuscitation program courses. Fam Med. 1996;28:403–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Kaczorowski J, Levitt C, Hammond M, Outerbridge E, Grad R, Rothman A, et al. Retention of neonatal resuscitation skills and knowledge: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Med. 1998;30:705–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Patel J, Posencheng M, Ades A. Proficiency and retention of neonatal resuscitation skills by pediatric residents. Pediatrics 2012;130:515–21.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Fossel M, Kiskaddon RT, Sternbach GL. Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills by medical students. Med Educ. 1983;58:568–75.Google Scholar

  • [8]

    Kaye W, Mancini M. Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills by physicians, registered nurses, and the general public. Crit Care Med. 1986;14:620–2.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Sawyer T, Sierocka-Castaneda A, Chan D, Berg B, Lustik M, Thompson M. Deliberate practice using simulation improves neonatal resuscitation performance. Simul Healthc. 2011;6:327–36.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Cordero L, Hart BJ, Hardin R, Mahan JD, Nankervis CA. Deliberate practice improves pediatric residents’ skills and team behaviors during simulated neonatal resuscitation. Clin Pediatr. 2013;52:747–52.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:363–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79:S70–80.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:988–94.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    Bloom BS. An introduction to mastery learning theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Publishers; 1971, p. 3–14.Google Scholar

  • [15]

    Kattwinkel J, editor. NRP neonatal resuscitation textbook. 6th ed. (English version). Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2011.Google Scholar

  • [16]

    Ilgen JS, Ma IW, Hatala R, Cook DA. A systematic review of validity evidence of checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment. Med Educ. 2015;49:161–73.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Pusic MV, Kessler D, Szyld D, Kalet A, Pecaric M, Boutis K. Experience curves as an organizing framework for deliberate practice in emergency medicine learning. Acad Emerg Med. 2012:19:1476–80.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Wood AM, Jones MD Jr, Wood JH, Pan Z, Parker TA. Neonatal resuscitation skills among pediatricians and family physicians: is residency training preparing for post residency practice? J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3:475–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]

    Carbine DN, Finer NN, Knodel E, Rich W. Video recording as a means of evaluating neonatal resuscitation performance. Pediatrics 2000;106:654–8.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    O’Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success, rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics 2006;117:e17–21.Google Scholar

  • [21]

    Block JH, editor. Mastery learning: theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1971.Google Scholar

  • [22]

    McGaghie WC, Miller GE, Sajid A, Telder TV. Competency based curriculum development in medical education. Public Health Paper No. 68. Geneva Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1978.Google Scholar

  • [23]

    Wayne DB, Siddall VJ, Butter J, Fudala MJ, Wade LD, Feinglass J, et al. A longitudinal study of internal medicine residents’ retention of advanced cardiac life support skills. Acad Med. 2006; 81(10 Suppl):S9–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-11-02

Accepted: 2018-01-18

Published Online: 2018-02-16

Published in Print: 2018-10-25


Author’s statement

Conflict of interest: None of the authors has a conflict of interest to report pertaining to this manuscript. Funding for this study was provided for by the NYU School of Medicine Division of Neonatology Stefan Bennett Fellowship Research Fund.

Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.


Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Volume 46, Issue 8, Pages 934–941, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2017-0330.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Rejina Gurung, Abhishek Gurung, Avinash K. Sunny, Omkar Basnet, Shree Krishna Shrestha, Øystein Herwig Gomo, Helge Myklebust, Sakina Girnary, and Ashish KC
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 2019, Volume 10, Number 1
[2]
Rejina Gurung, Abhishek Gurung, Avinash K. Sunny, Omkar Basnet, Shree Krishna Shrestha, Øystein Herwig Gomo, Helge Myklebust, Sakina Girnary, and Ashish KC
BMC Pediatrics, 2019, Volume 19, Number 1
[3]
Maria C den Boer, Mirjam Houtlosser, Elizabeth E Foglia, Ratna N G B Tan, Dirk P Engberts, and Arjan B te Pas
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 2019, Volume 104, Number 5, Page F528
[4]
Laura Root, Henriette A. van Zanten, Maria C. den Boer, Elizabeth E. Foglia, Ruben S. G. M. Witlox, and Arjan B. te Pas
Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2019, Volume 7
[5]
Lee Donohue, Kristin Hoffman, and James Marcin
Children, 2019, Volume 6, Number 4, Page 50
[6]
Nathan Money, Natalya Kusheleva, Susana Ruano, Seleshi Demissie, Jonathan Blau, and Vinisha Singhi
Journal of Perinatology, 2019, Volume 39, Number 5, Page 634

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in