Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Journal of Plant Protection Research

The Journal of Polish Society of Plant Protection, Committee of Plant Protection; Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.342
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.618

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1899-007X
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 54, Issue 3 (Jul 2014)

Issues

Interaction Between Bt-Transgenic Cotton and the Whitefly’s Parasitoid, Encarsia Formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae)

Solmaz Azimi
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, 5375171379 Iran
  • Email:
/ Shima Rahmani
  • Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 4111 Iran
/ Masoud Tohidfar
  • Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Karaj, 3135933151 Iran
/ Ahmad Ashouri
  • Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 4111 Iran
/ Alireza Bandani
  • Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 4111 Iran
/ Reza Talaei-Hassanlouei
  • Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 4111 Iran
Published Online: 2014-09-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jppr-2014-0041

Abstract

Transgenic Bt cotton developed against lepidopteran pests may not be compatible with parasitoid of secondary pests such as Bemisia tabaci which attack many plants such as cotton. In this study, the effects of Bt cotton on the demographic parameters of Encarsia formosa, parasitoid of B. tabaci were assessed. The data were analysed using the age specific, two-sex life table parameters. The results indicated that pre-adult developmental time, the total preoviposition period (TPOP) and the adult preoviposition period (APOP) in the Bt cotton were significantly longer than in the non-Bt cotton. Also, fecundity and body size in both lines were significantly different. The fecundity was 23.64±0.73 and 43.75±0.89 eggs/females in the Bt and non-Bt cotton, respectively. All the population parameters were affected by the Bt cotton. The intrinsic rate of increase (r) was 0.15 day-1 in the non-Bt cotton but it was 0.10 day-1 in the Bt cotton. The finite rate of increase (λ) was 1.11 day-1 in the non-Bt cotton whilst it was 1.08 in the Bt cotton. The net reproductive rate (R0) in the non-Bt cotton was 36.75 but in the Bt cotton these parameters showed 19.62 offspring/individual. Also, the mean generation time (T ) in the non-Bt and Bt cotton was 22.69 and 27.79 days, respectively. The results illustrated, that although transgenic crops are effective tools for management of the target pests, they can adversely affect, either directly or indirectly, the natural enemies dependent on these plants.

Keywords: Aphelinid parasitoid; biological control; demographic parameters; non-target organism; transgenic crop

References

  • Arpaia S., Schmidt J.E.U., Di Leo G.M., Fiore M.C. 2009. Oviposition of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) and natural predation on its egg masses in Bt-expressing fields. Bioc. Sci. Technol. 19 (9): 971-984. [Crossref]

  • Ashouri A. 2004. Seasonal occurrence and relative abundance of aphids on potato plants with classical and transgenic characters of resistance to Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 69 (3): 273-280. [PubMed]

  • Ashouri A., Michaud D., Cloutier C. 2001. Unexpected effects of different potato resistance factors to the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on the potato aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 30 (3): 524-532. [Crossref]

  • Baur M.E., Boethel D.J. 2003. Effect of Bt-cotton expressing Cry1A(c) on the survival and fecundity of two hymenopteran parasitoids (Braconidae, Encyrtidae) in the laboratory. Biol. Control 26 (3): 325-332. [Crossref]

  • Boisclair J., Brueren G.J., van Lenteren J.C. 1990. Can Bemisia tabaci be controlled with Encarsia formosa? SROP/IOBC WPRS Bulletin Working Group 13: 32-35.

  • Burgio G., Dinelli G., Marotti I., Zurla M., Bosi S., Lanzoni A. 2011. Bt-toxin uptake by the non target herbivore, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), feeding on transgenic oilseed rape in laboratory conditions. Bull. Entomol. Res. 101 (2): 241-247. [Web of Science] [Crossref] [PubMed]

  • Burgio G., Lanzoni A., Accinelli G., Dinelli G., Bonetti A., Marotti I., Ramilli F. 2007. Evaluation of Bt-toxin uptake by the nontarget herbivore, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), feeding on transgenic oilseed rape. Bull. Entomol. Res. 97 (2): 211-215. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Chenot A.B., Raffa K.F. 1998. Effects of parasitoid strain and host instar on the interaction of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki with the Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larval parasitoid Cotesia melanoscela (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environ. Entomol. 27 (1): 137-147.

  • Chi H. 1988. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 17 (1): 26-34.

  • Chi H. 2013. TWOSEX-MSChart: a computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis. http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/Download/Twosex-MSChart.zip [Accessed: October 6, 2013].

  • Chi H., Liu H. 1985. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Academia Sinica 24 (2): 225-240.

  • Cock M.J.W. 1993. Bemisia tabaci: an update 1986-1992 on the cotton whitefly with an annotated bibliography. CAB Int. Institute Biol. Control, Ascot, UK, 78 pp.

  • Faria C.A., Wackers F.L., Pritchard J., Barrett D.A., Turlings T.C. 2007. High susceptibility of Bt maize to aphids enhances the performance of parasitoids of lepidopteran pests. Plos One 2: e600. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000600. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Górecka J., Godzina M., Dabrowski Z.T. 2008. Effect of Bt maize MON 810 expressing CRY 1 Ab toxin on Aphidius colemani in tritrophic plant - herbivore - parasitoid system. J. Plant Prot. Res. 48 (1): 129-136.

  • Guo J.Y., Wan F.H., Dong L. 2004. Survival and development of immature Chrysopa sinica and Propylaea japonica feeding on Bemisia tabaci propagated on transgenic Bt cotton. Chin. J. Biol. Control 20 (2): 164-169.

  • Hagerty A.M., Turnipseed S.G., Sullivan M.J. 2000. Impact of beneficial arthropod conservation in Bt and conventional cotton. p. 976-978. In: Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX, Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN, USA, 4-8 January 2000, 1236 pp.

  • Hilbeck A., Baumgartner M., Fried P.M., Bigler F. 1998a. Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ. Entomol. 27 (2): 480-487.

  • Hilbeck A., Moar W.J., Pusztai-Carey M., Filippini A., F. Bigler. 1998b. Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin to the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ. Entomol. 27 (5): 1255-1263.

  • Hilbeck A., Moar W.J., Pusztai-Carey M., Filippini A., Bigler F. 1999. Preymediated effects of Cry1Ab toxin and protoxin and Cry2A protoxin on the predator Chrysoperla carnea. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 91 (2): 305-316.

  • Hilbeck A., Schmidt J.E.U. 2006. Another view on Bt proteins - How specific are they and what else might they do? Biopestic. Int. 2 (1): 1-50.

  • Hódar J.A., Zamora R., Castro J. 2002. Host utilization by moth and larval survival of pine processionary caterpillar Thau metopoea pityocampa in relation to food quality in three Pinus species. Ecol. Entomol. 27 (3): 292-301. [Crossref]

  • Hoddle M.S., van Driesche R.G., Sanderson J.P. 1998. Biology and use the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 645-669. [PubMed] [Crossref]

  • James C. 2010. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2010. ISAAA Brief No. 42. Ithaca, NY, USA: ISAAA.

  • Lawo N.C., Wäckers F.L., Romeis J. 2009. Indian Bt cotton varieties do not affect the performance of cotton aphids. Plos One 4: e4804. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004804. [Crossref]

  • Liu X.X., Zhang Q.W., Zhao J.-Z., Cai Q.N., Xu H.L., Li J.C. 2005a. Effects of the Cry1Ac toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis on Microplitis mediator (Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 114 (3): 205-213. [Crossref]

  • Liu X.X., Zhang Q.W., Zhao J.Z., Li J.C., Xu B.L., Ma X.M. 2005b. Effects of Bt transgenic cotton lines on the cotton bollworm parasitoid Microplitis mediator in the laboratory. Biol. Control 35 (2): 134-141. [Crossref]

  • Lövei G.L., Andow D.A., Arpaia S. 2009. Transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies: a detailed review of laboratory studies. Environ. Entomol. 38 (2): 293-306. [PubMed] [Crossref]

  • Mellet M.A., Schoeman A.S. 2007. Effect of Bt-cotton on chrysopids, ladybird beetles and their prey: aphids and whiteflies. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 45 (6): 554-562.

  • Naranjo S.E. 2009. Impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates and insecticide use patterns. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 4 (011): 1-23.

  • Oliveira M.R.V., Henneberry T.J., Anderson P. 2001. History, current status and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot. 20 (9): 709-723. [Crossref]

  • Pedigo L.P., Rice M. 2009. Entomology and Pest Management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 688 pp.

  • Price P. 1986. Ecological aspects of host plant resistance and biological control: Interactions among three trophic levels. p. 11-30. In: “Interactions of Plant Resistance and Parasitoids and Predation of Insects” (D.J. Boethel, R.D. Eikenbary, eds.). Ellis Horwood, West Sussex, 224 pp.

  • Ramirez-Romero R., Bernal J.S., Chaufaux J., Kaiser L. 2007. Impact assessment of Bt-maize on a moth parasitoid, Cotesia marginiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), via host exposure to purified Cry1Ab toxin or Bt-plants. Crop Prot. 26 (7): 953-962. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Raps A., Kehr J., Gugerli P., Moar W.J., Bigler F., Hilbeck A. 2001. Immunological analysis of phloem sap of Bacillus thuringiensis corn and of the nontarget herbivore Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphidiae) for the presence of Cry1Ab. Mol. Ecol. 10 (2): 525-533. [Crossref]

  • Southwood T.R.E. 1966. Ecological Methods: With Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. Methuen & Co., London, UK, 548 pp.

  • Twardowski J.P., Beres P.K., Hurej M., Klukowski Z., Dabrowski Z.T., Sowa S., Warzecha R. 2012. The quantitative changes of ground beetles (Col., Carabidae) in Bt and conventional maize crop in southern Poland. J. Plant. Prot. Res. 52 (4): 404-409.

  • Van Emden H.F. 1991. The role of host plant resistance in insect pest mis-management. Bull. Entomol. Res. 81 (2): 123-126. [Crossref]

  • Yan W.D., Shi W.M., Lia B.H., Zhang G.M. 2007. Overexpression of a foreign Bt gene in cotton affects the low-molecular- -weight components in root exudates. Pedosphere 17 (3): 324-330. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Zar J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 663 pp.

About the article

Received: 2014-03-16

Accepted: 2014-07-31

Published Online: 2014-09-12

Published in Print: 2014-07-01



Citation Information: Journal of Plant Protection Research, ISSN (Online) 1899-007X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jppr-2014-0041. Export Citation

© by Solmaz Azimi. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in