Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Plant Protection Research

The Journal of Polish Society of Plant Protection, Committee of Plant Protection; Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.332
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.829

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 54, Issue 3


Interaction Between Bt-Transgenic Cotton and the Whitefly’s Parasitoid, Encarsia Formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae)

Solmaz Azimi
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, 5375171379 Iran
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Shima Rahmani
  • Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 4111 Iran
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Masoud Tohidfar / Ahmad Ashouri
  • Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 4111 Iran
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Alireza Bandani
  • Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 4111 Iran
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Reza Talaei-Hassanlouei
  • Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 4111 Iran
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-09-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jppr-2014-0041


Transgenic Bt cotton developed against lepidopteran pests may not be compatible with parasitoid of secondary pests such as Bemisia tabaci which attack many plants such as cotton. In this study, the effects of Bt cotton on the demographic parameters of Encarsia formosa, parasitoid of B. tabaci were assessed. The data were analysed using the age specific, two-sex life table parameters. The results indicated that pre-adult developmental time, the total preoviposition period (TPOP) and the adult preoviposition period (APOP) in the Bt cotton were significantly longer than in the non-Bt cotton. Also, fecundity and body size in both lines were significantly different. The fecundity was 23.64±0.73 and 43.75±0.89 eggs/females in the Bt and non-Bt cotton, respectively. All the population parameters were affected by the Bt cotton. The intrinsic rate of increase (r) was 0.15 day-1 in the non-Bt cotton but it was 0.10 day-1 in the Bt cotton. The finite rate of increase (λ) was 1.11 day-1 in the non-Bt cotton whilst it was 1.08 in the Bt cotton. The net reproductive rate (R0) in the non-Bt cotton was 36.75 but in the Bt cotton these parameters showed 19.62 offspring/individual. Also, the mean generation time (T ) in the non-Bt and Bt cotton was 22.69 and 27.79 days, respectively. The results illustrated, that although transgenic crops are effective tools for management of the target pests, they can adversely affect, either directly or indirectly, the natural enemies dependent on these plants.

Keywords: Aphelinid parasitoid; biological control; demographic parameters; non-target organism; transgenic crop


  • Arpaia S., Schmidt J.E.U., Di Leo G.M., Fiore M.C. 2009. Oviposition of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) and natural predation on its egg masses in Bt-expressing fields. Bioc. Sci. Technol. 19 (9): 971-984.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ashouri A. 2004. Seasonal occurrence and relative abundance of aphids on potato plants with classical and transgenic characters of resistance to Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 69 (3): 273-280.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Ashouri A., Michaud D., Cloutier C. 2001. Unexpected effects of different potato resistance factors to the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on the potato aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 30 (3): 524-532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baur M.E., Boethel D.J. 2003. Effect of Bt-cotton expressing Cry1A(c) on the survival and fecundity of two hymenopteran parasitoids (Braconidae, Encyrtidae) in the laboratory. Biol. Control 26 (3): 325-332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boisclair J., Brueren G.J., van Lenteren J.C. 1990. Can Bemisia tabaci be controlled with Encarsia formosa? SROP/IOBC WPRS Bulletin Working Group 13: 32-35. Google Scholar

  • Burgio G., Dinelli G., Marotti I., Zurla M., Bosi S., Lanzoni A. 2011. Bt-toxin uptake by the non target herbivore, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), feeding on transgenic oilseed rape in laboratory conditions. Bull. Entomol. Res. 101 (2): 241-247.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Burgio G., Lanzoni A., Accinelli G., Dinelli G., Bonetti A., Marotti I., Ramilli F. 2007. Evaluation of Bt-toxin uptake by the nontarget herbivore, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), feeding on transgenic oilseed rape. Bull. Entomol. Res. 97 (2): 211-215.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chenot A.B., Raffa K.F. 1998. Effects of parasitoid strain and host instar on the interaction of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki with the Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larval parasitoid Cotesia melanoscela (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environ. Entomol. 27 (1): 137-147.Google Scholar

  • Chi H. 1988. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 17 (1): 26-34.Google Scholar

  • Chi H. 2013. TWOSEX-MSChart: a computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis. [Accessed: October 6, 2013].Google Scholar

  • Chi H., Liu H. 1985. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Academia Sinica 24 (2): 225-240.Google Scholar

  • Cock M.J.W. 1993. Bemisia tabaci: an update 1986-1992 on the cotton whitefly with an annotated bibliography. CAB Int. Institute Biol. Control, Ascot, UK, 78 pp. Google Scholar

  • Faria C.A., Wackers F.L., Pritchard J., Barrett D.A., Turlings T.C. 2007. High susceptibility of Bt maize to aphids enhances the performance of parasitoids of lepidopteran pests. Plos One 2: e600. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000600.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Górecka J., Godzina M., Dabrowski Z.T. 2008. Effect of Bt maize MON 810 expressing CRY 1 Ab toxin on Aphidius colemani in tritrophic plant - herbivore - parasitoid system. J. Plant Prot. Res. 48 (1): 129-136.Google Scholar

  • Guo J.Y., Wan F.H., Dong L. 2004. Survival and development of immature Chrysopa sinica and Propylaea japonica feeding on Bemisia tabaci propagated on transgenic Bt cotton. Chin. J. Biol. Control 20 (2): 164-169.Google Scholar

  • Hagerty A.M., Turnipseed S.G., Sullivan M.J. 2000. Impact of beneficial arthropod conservation in Bt and conventional cotton. p. 976-978. In: Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX, Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN, USA, 4-8 January 2000, 1236 pp.Google Scholar

  • Hilbeck A., Baumgartner M., Fried P.M., Bigler F. 1998a. Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ. Entomol. 27 (2): 480-487.Google Scholar

  • Hilbeck A., Moar W.J., Pusztai-Carey M., Filippini A., F. Bigler. 1998b. Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin to the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ. Entomol. 27 (5): 1255-1263.Google Scholar

  • Hilbeck A., Moar W.J., Pusztai-Carey M., Filippini A., Bigler F. 1999. Preymediated effects of Cry1Ab toxin and protoxin and Cry2A protoxin on the predator Chrysoperla carnea. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 91 (2): 305-316.Google Scholar

  • Hilbeck A., Schmidt J.E.U. 2006. Another view on Bt proteins - How specific are they and what else might they do? Biopestic. Int. 2 (1): 1-50.Google Scholar

  • Hódar J.A., Zamora R., Castro J. 2002. Host utilization by moth and larval survival of pine processionary caterpillar Thau metopoea pityocampa in relation to food quality in three Pinus species. Ecol. Entomol. 27 (3): 292-301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoddle M.S., van Driesche R.G., Sanderson J.P. 1998. Biology and use the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 645-669.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • James C. 2010. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2010. ISAAA Brief No. 42. Ithaca, NY, USA: ISAAA.Google Scholar

  • Lawo N.C., Wäckers F.L., Romeis J. 2009. Indian Bt cotton varieties do not affect the performance of cotton aphids. Plos One 4: e4804. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu X.X., Zhang Q.W., Zhao J.-Z., Cai Q.N., Xu H.L., Li J.C. 2005a. Effects of the Cry1Ac toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis on Microplitis mediator (Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 114 (3): 205-213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu X.X., Zhang Q.W., Zhao J.Z., Li J.C., Xu B.L., Ma X.M. 2005b. Effects of Bt transgenic cotton lines on the cotton bollworm parasitoid Microplitis mediator in the laboratory. Biol. Control 35 (2): 134-141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lövei G.L., Andow D.A., Arpaia S. 2009. Transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies: a detailed review of laboratory studies. Environ. Entomol. 38 (2): 293-306.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mellet M.A., Schoeman A.S. 2007. Effect of Bt-cotton on chrysopids, ladybird beetles and their prey: aphids and whiteflies. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 45 (6): 554-562.Google Scholar

  • Naranjo S.E. 2009. Impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates and insecticide use patterns. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 4 (011): 1-23.Google Scholar

  • Oliveira M.R.V., Henneberry T.J., Anderson P. 2001. History, current status and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot. 20 (9): 709-723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pedigo L.P., Rice M. 2009. Entomology and Pest Management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 688 pp.Google Scholar

  • Price P. 1986. Ecological aspects of host plant resistance and biological control: Interactions among three trophic levels. p. 11-30. In: “Interactions of Plant Resistance and Parasitoids and Predation of Insects” (D.J. Boethel, R.D. Eikenbary, eds.). Ellis Horwood, West Sussex, 224 pp.Google Scholar

  • Ramirez-Romero R., Bernal J.S., Chaufaux J., Kaiser L. 2007. Impact assessment of Bt-maize on a moth parasitoid, Cotesia marginiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), via host exposure to purified Cry1Ab toxin or Bt-plants. Crop Prot. 26 (7): 953-962.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Raps A., Kehr J., Gugerli P., Moar W.J., Bigler F., Hilbeck A. 2001. Immunological analysis of phloem sap of Bacillus thuringiensis corn and of the nontarget herbivore Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphidiae) for the presence of Cry1Ab. Mol. Ecol. 10 (2): 525-533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Southwood T.R.E. 1966. Ecological Methods: With Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. Methuen & Co., London, UK, 548 pp.Google Scholar

  • Twardowski J.P., Beres P.K., Hurej M., Klukowski Z., Dabrowski Z.T., Sowa S., Warzecha R. 2012. The quantitative changes of ground beetles (Col., Carabidae) in Bt and conventional maize crop in southern Poland. J. Plant. Prot. Res. 52 (4): 404-409.Google Scholar

  • Van Emden H.F. 1991. The role of host plant resistance in insect pest mis-management. Bull. Entomol. Res. 81 (2): 123-126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yan W.D., Shi W.M., Lia B.H., Zhang G.M. 2007. Overexpression of a foreign Bt gene in cotton affects the low-molecular- -weight components in root exudates. Pedosphere 17 (3): 324-330.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zar J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 663 pp. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-03-16

Accepted: 2014-07-31

Published Online: 2014-09-12

Published in Print: 2014-07-01

Citation Information: Journal of Plant Protection Research, Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 272–278, ISSN (Online) 1899-007X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jppr-2014-0041.

Export Citation

© by Solmaz Azimi. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

de Oliveira Rob eacute rio, Machado Oliveira Gemerson, dos Santos de Souza Mileny, Andrade Borba Matheus, Vendruscolo Jhony, da Silva Nunes Gilmar, Nunes Nascimento Izabela, and de Luna Batista Jacinto
African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2016, Volume 11, Number 26, Page 2266

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in