Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports

An official journal of the American Statistical Association

Editor-in-Chief: Glickman, PhD, Mark

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.358
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.250

Online
ISSN
1559-0410
See all formats and pricing

Comparing Team Selection and Seeding for the 2011 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament

Kathy L. Gray
  • California State University, Chico
/ Neil C. Schwertman
  • California State University, Chico
Published Online: 2012-03-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/1559-0410.1369

The men’s NCAA basketball tournament is a popular sporting event often referred to as “March Madness.” Each year the NCAA committee not only selects but also seeds the tournament teams. Invariably there is much discussion about which teams were included and excluded as well as discussion about the seeding of the teams. In this paper, we propose an innovative heuristic measure of team success, and we investigate how well the NCAA committee seeding compares to the computer-based placements by Sagarin and the rating percentage index (RPI). For the 2011 tournament, the NCAA committee selection process performed better than those based solely on the computer methods in determining tournament success.

Keywords: NCAA; men’s basketball; seeding; RPI; Sagarin

About the article

Published Online: 2012-03-12


Citation Information: Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, ISSN (Online) 1559-0410, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/1559-0410.1369. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in