Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports

An official journal of the American Statistical Association

Editor-in-Chief: Steve Rigdon, PhD

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.67

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.290
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.853

Online
ISSN
1559-0410
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 9, Issue 2

Issues

Volume 1 (2005)

Bicycle tours: modeling the perceived exertion of a daily path

Katherine Carl / Susan A. Brown / Moshe Dror / Alexandra Durcikova
Published Online: 2013-05-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2012-0052

Abstract

The desire to promote healthier and more environmentally conscious methods of commuting has generated increased interest in professional and recreational bicycling in recent years. One of the most important factors cyclists consider when riding is the amount of exertion they will perceive on a given path. In this paper, we build and test a model of the perceived exertion of different categories of cyclists on a daily path within a long bicycle tour. We first propose an additive formula for calculating the perceived exertion of cyclists on component parts of a tour and then present the results of a survey designed to verify the accuracy of the model. Distance, elevation gain, average percent grade, maximum percent grade, and cyclists’ level of expertise are shown to be significant predictors of perceived exertion (p<0.005). Repeated measures analysis indicated that 109 of the 120 perceived exertion levels produced by our model fit the reported perceived exertion levels of the 242 avid cyclists who participated in the validation survey.

Keywords: exertion; cycling; RPE

References

  • Abel, M. V. 2011. “International Mountain Bicycling Association.” (http://www.imba.com). Accessed on April 19, 2010.

  • Borg, G. A. V. 1973. “Perceived Exertion: A Note on “History” and Methods.” Medicine and Science in Sports 5:90–93.Google Scholar

  • Burke, E. R. 2002. High-tech Cycling. 2nd ed. Human Kinetics.Google Scholar

  • Codifava, G. 2012. “Climbbybike.” (http://www.climbbybike.com). Accessed on December 12, 2012.

  • Cohen, J. 1973. “Eta-Squared and Partial eta-Squared in Fixed Factor Anova Designs.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 33:107–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coyle, E. F., M. E. Feltner, S. A. Kautz, M. T. Hamilton, S. J. Montain, A. M. Baylor, L. D. Abraham, and G. W. Petrek. 1991. “Physiological and Biomechanical Factors Associated with Elite Endurance Cycling Performance.” Biodynamics 23:93–107.Google Scholar

  • Mager, M. 2011. “USA cycling.” (http://www.usacycling.org). Accessed on January 3, 2010.

  • Martin, J. C., D. L. Milliken, J. E. Cobb, K. L. McFadden, and A. R. Coggan. 1998. “Validation of a Mathematical Model for Road Cycling Power.” Journal of Applied Biomechanics 14:276–291.Google Scholar

  • Morgan, W. P. 1973. “Psychological Factors Influencing Perceived Exertion.” Medicine and Science in Sports 5:97–103.Google Scholar

  • Parkin, J. and J. Rotheram. 2010. “Design Speeds and Acceleration Characteristics of Bicycle Traffic for use in Planning, Design and Appraisal.” Transport Policy 17:335–341.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pucher, J., R. Buehler, D. Merom, and A. Bauman. (2011. “Walking and Cycling in the United States, 2001–2009: Evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys.” American Journal of Public Health 101:S310–S317.Google Scholar

  • Scarf, P. and P. Grehan. 2005. “An Empirical Basis for Route Choice in Cycling.” Journal of Sports Sciences 23:919–925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skinner, J. S., R. Hustler, V. Bergsteinová, and E. R. Buskirk. 1973. “The Validity and Reliability of a Rating Scale of Perceived Exertion.” Medicine and Science in Sports 5:94–96.Google Scholar

  • Summerson, J. 2007. The Complete Guide to Climbing (by Bike). Winston-Salem, NC: Extreme Press.Google Scholar

  • White, A. 1994. “Factors Affecting Speed in Human-Powered Vehicles.” Journal of Sports Sciences 12:419–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Katherine Carl, Management Information Systems, University of Arizona, Eller College of Management, McClelland Hall, Room 430, P.O. Box 210108, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, Tel.: +520 621 2748, Fax: +520 621 2433


Published Online: 2013-05-27

Published in Print: 2013-06-01


Degrees of global latitude and longitude coordinates are divided into the smaller units of measurement arc-minute and arc-second, where 1°=60 arc-min and 1 arc-minute=60 arc-s. One degree of latitude is approximately 69 miles, 1 min of latitude is approximately 1.15 miles, and 1 s of latitude is approximately 100 feet. One degree of longitude varies in size with distance from the equator. At 1/3 arc-second resolution, we can accurately distinguish elevation between locations on a USA map that are 10 m or slightly more than 32 feet apart.

See http://www.surveygizmo.com.

See http://highaltitude2u.com/.


Citation Information: Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 203–216, ISSN (Online) 1559-0410, ISSN (Print) 2194-6388, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2012-0052.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Katherine Carl Payne and Moshe Dror
Sports Technology, 2015, Volume 8, Number 1-2, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in