Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports

An official journal of the American Statistical Association

Editor-in-Chief: Steve Rigdon, PhD

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.67

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.290
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.853

Online
ISSN
1559-0410
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 10, Issue 1

Issues

Volume 1 (2005)

A Bayesian stochastic model for batting performance evaluation in one-day cricket

Theodoro Koulis / Saman Muthukumarana / Creagh Dyson Briercliffe
Published Online: 2014-01-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2013-0057

Abstract

We consider the modeling of individual batting performance in one-day international (ODI) cricket by using a batsman-specific hidden Markov model (HMM). The batsman-specific number of hidden states allows us to account for the heterogeneous dynamics found in batting performance. Parallel sampling is used to choose the optimal number of hidden states. Using the batsman-specific HMM, we then introduce measures of performance to assess individual players via reliability analysis. By classifying states as either up or down, we compute the availability, reliability, failure rate and mean time to failure for each batsman. By choosing an appropriate classification of states, an overall prediction of batting performance of a batsman can be made. The classification of states can also be modified according to the type of game under consideration. One advantage of this batsman-specific HMM is that it does not require the consideration of unforeseen factors. This is important since cricket has gone through several rule changes in recent years that have further induced unforeseen dynamic factors to the game. We showcase the approach using data from 20 different batsmen having different underlying dynamics and representing different countries.

Keywords: Gibbs sampling; Hidden Markov model; parallel sampling; reliability analysis

References

  • Akaike, H. 1973. “Information Theory and an Extension of The Maximum Likelihood Principle.” in 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, 267–281.Google Scholar

  • Albert, J. 2002. “Hitting with Runners in Scoring Position.” Chance 15:8–16.Google Scholar

  • Bailey, M. and S. Clarke. 2004. “Market Inefficiencies in Player Head to Head Betting on The 2003 Cricket World Cup.” pp. 185–202 in Economics, Management and Optimization in Sport, edited by S. Butenko, J. Gil-Lafuente, and P. Pardalos. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Bailey, M. and S. Clarke. 2006. “Predicting the Match Outcome in One Day International Cricket Matches, While The Match is in Progress.” Journal of Science and Sports Medicine 5:480–487.Google Scholar

  • Barbu, V. and N. Limnios. 2008. “Semi-Markov Chains and Hidden Semi-Markov Models Toward Applications: Their Use in Reliability and DNA Analysis, Lecture Notes in Statistics-Springer, Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar

  • Beaudoin, D. 2003. The Best Batsmen and Bowlers in One-Day Cricket. Master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science.Google Scholar

  • Brewer, B. J. 2008. “Getting Your Eye in: A Bayesian Analysis of Early Dismissals in Cricket,” pre-print, arXiv:0801.4408v2 [stat.AP].Google Scholar

  • Carlin, B. P. and S. Chib. 1995. “Bayesian Model Choice via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 57:473–484.Google Scholar

  • Congdon, P. 2006. “Bayesian Model Choice Based on Monte Carlo Estimates of Posterior Model Probabilities.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 50:346–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Daniyal, M., T. Nawaz, I. Mubeen, and M. Aleem. 2012. “Analysis of Batting Performance in Cricket Using Individual and Moving Range (mr) Control Charts.” International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering 6:195–202.Google Scholar

  • de Campos, C. P. and A. Benavoli. 2011. “Inference with Multinomial Data: Why to Weaken the Prior Strength,” pp. 2107–2112 in Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence..Google Scholar

  • de Silva, B. and T. B. Swartz. 1997. “Winning the Coin Toss and The Home Team Advantage in One-Day International Cricket Matches.” New Zealand Statistician 32:16–22.Google Scholar

  • Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2010. Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models. Springer Series in Statistics, Springer.Google Scholar

  • Green, P. J. 1995. “Reversible Jump Markov chain Monte Carlo Computation and Bayesian Model Determination.” Biometrika 82:711–732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hintze, J. L. and R. D. Nelson. 1998. “Violin plots: A Box plot-Density Trace Synergism.” The American Statistician 52:181–184.Google Scholar

  • Jensen, S. T., B. B. McShane, and A. J. Wyner. 2009. “Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling of Hitting Performance in Baseball.” Bayesian Analysis 4:631–652.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kass, R. E. and A. E. Raftery. 1995. “Bayes Factors.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:773–795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kimber, A. C. and A. R. Hansford. 1993. “A Statistical Analysis of Batting in Cricket.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 156:443–455.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lemmer, H. H. 2004. “A Measure for The Batting Performance of Cricket Players.” South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation 26:55–64.Google Scholar

  • Lemmer, H. H. 2007. “The Allocation of Weights in The Calculation of Batting and Bowling Performance Measures.” South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation 29:75–85.Google Scholar

  • Lemmer, H. H. 2011. “The Single Match Approach to Strike Rate Adjustments in Batting Performance Measures in Cricket.” Journal of Sports Science & Medicine 10:630–634.Google Scholar

  • Martin, J. 1967. Bayesian Decision Problems and Markov Chains. Publications in Operations Research, Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Rabiner, L. R. 1989. “A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition.” Proceedings of the IEEE 77:257–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raj, B. 2002. “Asymmetry of Business Cycles: The Markov-Switching Approach.” pp. 687–710 in Handbook of Applied Econometrics and Statistical Inference, edited by A. Ullah, A. Wan, and A. Chaturvedi. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar

  • Roy, D. and R. Gupta. 1992. “Classifications of Discrete Lives.” Microelectronics Reliability 32:1459–1473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryden, T. 2008. “EM versus Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Estimation of Hidden Markov Models: A Computational Perspective.” Bayesian Analysis 3:659–688.Google Scholar

  • Sadek, A. and N. Limnios. 2002. “Asymptotic Properties for Maximum Likelihood Estimators for Reliability and Failure Rates of Markov Chains.” Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 31:1837–1861.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, G. 1978. “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.” The Annals of Statistics 6:461–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scott, S. L. 2002. “Bayesian Methods for Hidden Markov Models: Recursive Computing in the 21st Century.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 97:337–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swartz, T. B., P. S. Gill, D. Beaudoin, and B. de Silva. 2006. “Optimal Batting Orders in One-Day Cricket.” Computers and Operations Research 33:1939–1950.Google Scholar

  • Swartz, T. B., P. S. Gill, and S. Muthukumarana. 2009. “Modelling and Simulation for One-Day Cricket.” Canadian Journal of Statistics 37:143–160.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, B. C. and M. Anand. 2005. “On the Use of Stationary versus Hidden Markov Models to Detect Simple versus Complex Ecological Dynamics.” Ecological Modelling 185:177–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Valero, J. and T. B. Swartz. 2012. “An Investigation of Synergy Between Batsmen in Opening Partnerships.” Sri Lankan Journal of Applied Statistics 13:87–98.Google Scholar

  • van Staden, P. 2009. “Comparison of Cricketers’ Bowling and Batting Performances using Graphical Displays.” Current Science 96:764–766.Google Scholar

  • van Staden, P., A. Meiring, J. Steyn, and I. Fabris-Rotelli. 2010. “Meaningful Batting Averages in Cricket.” pp. 75–82 in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Conference of the South African Statistical Association for 2010, edited by P. Debba, F. Lombard, V. Yadavalli, and L. Fatti, Potchefstroom: North-West University.Google Scholar

  • Xie, M., O. Gaudoin, and C. Bracquemond. 2002. “Redefining Failure Rate Function for Discrete Distributions.” International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 9:275–285.Google Scholar

  • Zucchini, W. and I. MacDonald. 2009. Hidden Markov Models for Time Series: An Introduction Using R. Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Theodoro Koulis, Department of Statistics, University of Manitoba, 338 Machray Hall, Winnipeg Manitoba R3T2N2, Canada, Tel.: 204-474-8205, Fax: 204-474-7621, e-mail:


Published Online: 2014-01-25

Published in Print: 2014-01-01


Citation Information: Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 1–13, ISSN (Online) 1559-0410, ISSN (Print) 2194-6388, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2013-0057.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Paul J. Bracewell, Ankit K. Patel, Evan J. Blackie, and Chris Boys
Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 2017, Volume 19, Number 3, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in