Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports

An official journal of the American Statistical Association

Editor-in-Chief: Glickman, PhD, Mark

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.358
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.250

Online
ISSN
1559-0410
See all formats and pricing

Building an NCAA men’s basketball predictive model and quantifying its success

Michael J. Lopez
  • Corresponding author
  • Skidmore College – Mathematics and Computer Science, 815 N. Broadway Harder Hall, Saratoga Springs, New York 12866, USA
  • Email:
/ Gregory J. Matthews
  • Loyola University Chicago – Mathematics and Statistics, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Published Online: 2015-02-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2014-0058

Abstract

Computing and machine learning advancements have led to the creation of many cutting-edge predictive algorithms, some of which have been demonstrated to provide more accurate forecasts than traditional statistical tools. In this manuscript, we provide evidence that the combination of modest statistical methods with informative data can meet or exceed the accuracy of more complex models when it comes to predicting the NCAA men’s basketball tournament. First, we describe a prediction model that merges the point spreads set by Las Vegas sportsbooks with possession based team efficiency metrics by using logistic regressions. The set of probabilities generated from this model most accurately predicted the 2014 tournament, relative to approximately 400 competing submissions, as judged by the log loss function. Next, we attempt to quantify the degree to which luck played a role in the success of this model by simulating tournament outcomes under different sets of true underlying game probabilities. We estimate that under the most optimistic of game probability scenarios, our entry had roughly a 12% chance of outscoring all competing submissions and just less than a 50% chance of finishing with one of the ten best scores.

Keywords: basketball; NCAA; predictive modeling; simulations; tournament

References

  • Barra, A. 2014. Is March Madness a Sporting Event – or a Gambling Event?. URL http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/03/is-march-madness-a-sporting-event-or-a-gambling-event/284545/ (accessed June 1, 2014).

  • Boudway, I. 2014. The Legal Madness Around NCAA Bracket Pools. URL http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-03-15/the-legal-madness-around-ncaa-bracket-pools (accessed June 1, 2014).

  • Boulier, B. L. and H. O. Stekler. 1999. “Are Sports Seedings Good Predictors?: An Evaluation.” International Journal of Forecasting 15:83–91. [Crossref]

  • Breiter, D. J. and B. P. Carlin. 1997. “How to Play Office Pools if You Must.” Chance 10:5–11.

  • Carlin, B. P. 1996. “Improved NCAA Basketball Tournament Modeling Via Point Spread and Team Strength Information.” The American Statistician 50:39–43.

  • Caruana, R. and A. Niculescu-Mizil. 2006. “An Empirical Comparison of Supervised Learning Algorithms.” In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ACM. pp. 161–168.

  • Colquitt, L. L., N. H. Godwin, and S. B. Caudill. 2001. “Testing Efficiency Across Markets: Evidence from the NCAA Basketball Betting Market.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 28:231–248. [Crossref]

  • Constantinou, A. C., N. E. Fenton, and M. Neil. 2013. “Profiting from an Inefficient Association Football Gambling Market: Prediction, Risk and Uncertainty using Bayesian Networks.” Knowledge-Based Systems 50:60–86. [Web of Science]

  • Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning. Multiple classifier systems (pp. 1–15). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  • ESPN. 2014. Official Rules. URL http://games.espn.go.com/tournament-challenge-bracket/2014 (accessed June 1, 2014).

  • Hansen, L. K. and P. Salamon. 1990. “Neural Network Ensembles.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12:993–1001. [Crossref]

  • Harville, D. 1980. “Predictions for National Football League Games Via Linear-Model Methodology.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 75:516–524. [Crossref]

  • Kaggle. 2014. Competition Forum. URL https://www.kaggle.com/c/march-machine-learning-mania/forums (accessed June 1, 2014).

  • Kubatko, J., D. Oliver, K. Pelton, and D. T. Rosenbaum. 2007. “A Starting Point for Analyzing Basketball Statistics.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 3:1–22.

  • Kvam, P. and J. S. Sokol. 2006. “A Logistic Regression/Markov Chain Model for NCAA Basketball.” Naval Research Logistics (NrL) 53:788–803. [Crossref]

  • Linna, K., E. Moore, R. Paul, and A. Weinbach. 2014. “The Effects of the Clock and Kickoff Rule Changes on Actual and Market-Based Expected Scoring in NCAA Football.” International Journal of Financial Studies 2:179–192.

  • Metrick, A. 1996. “March Madness? Strategic Behavior in NCAA Basketball Tournament Betting Pools.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 30:159–172. [Crossref]

  • Nichols, M. W. 2014. “The Impact of Visiting Team Travel on Game Outcome and Biases in NFL Betting Markets.” Journal of Sports Economics 15:78–96. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Opitz, D. and R. Maclin. 1999. “Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11:169–198.

  • Pagels, J. 2014. Challenging the Tournament Challenge: Devising a More Equitable Bracket Scoring System. URL https://www.bsports.com/statsinsights/ncaa/march-madness-scoring.

  • Paul, R. J. and A. P. Weinbach. 2014. “Market Efficiency and Behavioral Biases in the WNBA Betting Market.” International Journal of Financial Studies 2:193–202.

  • Paul, R. and A. Weinbach. 2005. “Market Efficiency and NCAA College Basketball Gambling.” Journal of Economics and Finance 29:403–408. [Crossref]

  • Pomeroy, K. 2012. Ratings Glossary. URL http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/ratings_glossary (accessed June 1, 2014).

  • Schwertman, N. C., K. L. Schenk, and B. C. Holbrook. 1996. “More Probability Models for the NCAA Regional Basketball Tournaments.” The American Statistician 50:34–38.

  • Stern, H. 1991. “On the Probability of Winning a Football Game.” The American Statistician 45:179–183.

  • TeamRankings. 2014. NCAA BB Team Possessions per Game. URL http://www.teamrankings.com/ncb/ (accessed June 1, 2014).

  • Tsu, T. 2014. March Madness: Distracted Workers, Illegal Gambling, Loss of Sleep? URL http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/12/business/la-fi-mo-march-madness-20120312 (accessed June 1, 2014).

  • Yahoo 2014. Official Rules. URL https://www.quickenloansbracket.com/rules/rules.html (accessed June 1, 2014).

About the article

Corresponding author: Michael J. Lopez, Skidmore College – Mathematics and Computer Science, 815 N. Broadway Harder Hall, Saratoga Springs, New York 12866, USA, Tel.: +9784072221, e-mail:


Published Online: 2015-02-24

Published in Print: 2015-03-01


Citation Information: Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, ISSN (Online) 1559-0410, ISSN (Print) 2194-6388, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2014-0058. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in