Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Kulikov, Leonid

Online
ISSN
2196-078X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The lexical and discourse functions of grammatical gender in Marathi

Pär Eliasson / Marc Tang
Published Online: 2018-11-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2018-0012

Abstract

We provide a functional analysis of the grammatical gender system of Marathi (Indo-Aryan) in Western India. The majority of the new Indo-Aryan languages typically classifies each noun of the lexicon according to biological gender as masculine and feminine. Only a few Indo-Aryan languages such as Marathi diverge in terms of agreement pattern by categorizing nouns as masculine, feminine, and neuter. Yet gender in Marathi has not been extensively described in terms of functions. We thus use apply functional typology to analyze grammatical gender in Marathi and provide detailed examples of its lexical and discourse functions.

Keywords: grammatical gender; Marathi; functions

References

  • Acharya, Jayaraj. 1991. A descriptive grammar of Nepali and an analyzed corpus. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2016. How gender shapes the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Apte, Mahadeo L. 1962. A sketch of Marathi transformational grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar

  • Bashir, Elena. 2014. Dardic. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 905–990. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Basirat, Ali & Marc Tang. 2018. Lexical and morpho-syntactic features in word embeddings: A case study of nouns in Swedish. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence 2, 663–674.Google Scholar

  • Bloomfield, Leonard. 1962. The Menomini language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Butt, Miriam. 2006. Theories of case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cardona, George & Babu Suthar. 2003. Gujarati. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 722–765. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Claudi, Ulrike. 1985. Zur Entstehung von Genussystemen: Überlegungen zu einigen theoretischen Aspekten, verbunden mit einer Fallstudie des Zande. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar

  • Contini-Morava, Ellen. 2000. Noun class as a number in Swahili. In Ellen Contini-Morava & Yishai Tobin (eds.), Between grammar and lexicon, 3–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Contini-Morava, Ellen & Marcin Kilarski. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 40. 263–299. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Corbett, Greville G. 2013. Number of genders. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar

  • Corbett, Greville G. & Sebastian Fedden. 2016. Canonical gender. Journal of Linguistics 52(3). 495–531.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dahl, Eystein & Krzysztof Stroński. 2016. Ergativity in Indo-Aryan and beyond. In Eystein Dahl & Krzysztof Stroński (eds.), Indo-Aryan ergativity in typological and diachronic perspective, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Dhongde, Ramesh V. 1985. Modern Marathi. Pune: Continental.Google Scholar

  • Dhongde, Ramesh V. & Kashi Wali. 2009. Marathi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 1983. The Turkana language. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Doetjes, Jenny. 2012. Count/mass distinctions across languages. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, part III, 2559–2580. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Fedden, Sebastian & Greville G. Corbett. 2017. Gender and classifiers in concurrent systems: Refining the typology of nominal classification. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2(1). 1–47. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ferrari, Franca. 2005. A syntactic analysis of the nominal systems of Italian and Luganda: How nouns can be formed in the syntax. PhD dissertation. New York University.Google Scholar

  • Fraurud, Kari. 2000. Proper names and gender in Swedish. In Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Mirja Saari (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition, 167–220. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Gil, David. 2013. Numeral classifiers. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar

  • Gillon, Brendan S. 1999. The lexical semantics of English count and mass nouns. In Evelyne Viegas (ed.), Breadth and depth of semantic lexicons, 19–37. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Goddard, Ives. 2002. Grammatical gender in Alqonquian. In Christoph Wolfart (ed.), Papers of the thirty-third Algonquian conference, 195–231. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar

  • Gupte, Sharad M. 1975. Relative constructions in Marathi. PhD dissertation. Michigan State University, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

  • Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Joshi, Smita. 1993. Selections of grammatical and logical functions in Marathi. PhD dissertation. University of California, Stanford.Google Scholar

  • Kemmerer, David. 2017. Categories of object concepts across languages and brains: The relevance of nominal classification systems to cognitive neuroscience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32(4). 401–424. .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kiryu, Kazuyuki. 2009. On the rise of the classifier system in Newar. Senri Ethonological Studies 75. 51–69.Google Scholar

  • Koul, Omkar N. 2003. Kashmiri. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 991–1051. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kouwenberg, Silvia. 2001. Convergence and explanations in creole genesis. In Norval Smith & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Creolization and contact, 219–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Kraaikamp, Margot. 2016. Semantic gender agreement: Dutch and German compared. Linguistics in Amsterdam 9. 1–29.Google Scholar

  • Kraaikamp, Margot. 2017. Semantic versus lexical gender: Synchronic and diachronic variation in Germanic gender agreement. Utrecht: LOT, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lucy, John. 2000. Systems of nominal classification: A concluding discussion. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 326–341. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Masica, Colin P. 1993. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Navalkar, Ganpatrao R. 2001. The student’s Marathi grammar. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services.Google Scholar

  • Nayudu, Aarati. 2008. Issues in the syntax of Marathi: A minimalist approach. PhD dissertation. Durham University.Google Scholar

  • Pokharel, Madhav P. 2010. Noun class agreement in Nepali. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 7. 40–59.Google Scholar

  • Seiler, Hansjakob. 1986. Apprehension: Language, object, and order. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

  • Senft, Gunter. 2000. Systems of nominal classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tobin, Yishai. 2001. Gender switch in modern Hebrew. In Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, vol. I. 177–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Verma, Manindra K. 2003. Bhojpuri. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 566–589. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Wali, Kashi. 1989. Marathi syntax: A study of reflexives. Patiala: Indian Institute of Language Studies.Google Scholar

  • Wali, Kashi. 2006. Marathi: A study of comparative South Asian languages. Delhi: Indian Institute of Language Studies.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-11-30

Published in Print: 2018-11-27


Citation Information: Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 131–157, ISSN (Online) 2196-078X, ISSN (Print) 2196-0771, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2018-0012.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in