Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Journal of Tort Law

Founded by Coleman, Jules

Editor-in-Chief: Robinette, Christopher

Editorial Board Member: Geistfeld, Mark A / Goldberg, John / Perry, Ronen / Sharkey, Catherine M. / Witt, John / Zipursky, Benjamin

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.241
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.170
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.227

See all formats and pricing

Repeat Players in Federal Multidistrict Litigation

1Federal Judicial Center, Washington, DC, USA

Citation Information: Journal of Tort Law J. Tort Law. Volume 5, Issue 1-2, Pages 141–172, ISSN (Online) 1932-9148, ISSN (Print) 2194-6515, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jtl-2014-0011, April 2014

Publication History

Published Online:


In Mass Torts in a World of Settlement, Richard Nagareda noted the importance of the highly specialized bar in creating the existing multidistrict litigation (MDL) landscape. In fact, Nagareda argues that mass torts “accentuate the role of lawyers as agents” who make and enforce a “grand, all-encompassing peace” (2007, p. ix). The influence this bar wields is so great that much of the book is dedicated to discussing potential limits on these administrators. Similarly, the emergence of a specialized segment of the bar is noted by several scholars of MDL, but there has been little systematic research. Using social network analysis, we look to address this issue by examining clusters of plaintiff attorneys over time. We find that the bar is really broken into two groups: generalists, working in several types of MDL proceedings, and specialists, those who tend to focus on a single type of MDL. These findings suggest not all types of proceedings operate in the same way. Moreover, we find that there is significant variation among proceedings in the pace at which specialized lawyers join the litigation.

Keywords: Multidistrict litigation; repeat players; network analysis

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.