Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Tort Law

Founded by Coleman, Jules

Editor-in-Chief: Robinette, Christopher

Editorial Board Member: Geistfeld, Mark A / Goldberg, John / Perry, Ronen / Sharkey, Catherine M. / Witt, John / Zipursky, Benjamin

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.241
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.170

Online
ISSN
1932-9148
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Products Liability As Enterprise Liability

Gregory C. Keating
  • Corresponding author
  • Law, University of Southern California, University Park, Los Angeles, California 90089-0071, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-06-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jtl-2017-0009

Abstract

In the American legal academy, the prevailing wisdom about the rise of modern products liability law is framed by a debate which took place more than thirty years ago. George Priest’s brilliant 1985 paper The Invention of Enterprise Liability, asserted that modern American products liability law in its formative moment was enterprise liability incarnate, but condemned this commitment as itself a profound defect in products liability law. With rhetoric worthy of a Biblical Jeremiad, Priest argued that the “unavoidable implication of the three presuppositions of [enterprise liability] is absolute liability. The presuppositions themselves do not incorporate any conceptual limit to manufacturer liability.” Priest’s work was both immensely influential and sharply contested. Gary Schwartz, writing independently at first, argued that products liability law was really fault liability all along. According to Schwartz, the “vitality of negligence” was the driving force behind the expansion of tort liability over the course of the 20th century. Negligence conceptions lurked beneath product liability law’s surface embrace of strict liability. Or so Schwartz argued. Product defect liability was strict liability in name, but the risk-utility test of product defectiveness was in fact an aggressive application of negligence criteria.

Keywords: products liability; enterprise liability; tort law

About the article

Published Online: 2017-06-23

Published in Print: 2017-08-28


Citation Information: Journal of Tort Law, ISSN (Online) 1932-9148, ISSN (Print) 2194-6515, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jtl-2017-0009.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in