Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Veterinary Research

formerly Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2016: 0.462

CiteScore 2016: 0.46

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.230
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.383

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2450-8608
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Influence of post-mortem muscle glycogen content on the quality of beef during aging

Anna Onopiuk
  • Department of Technique and Food Development, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Andrzej Półtorak
  • Department of Technique and Food Development, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Agnieszka Wierzbicka
  • Department of Technique and Food Development, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-09-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2016-0046

Abstract

Introduction: Glycolic changes which occur post-mortem have an impact on the physical and sensory features of beef, which in turn determine the successive processes and influence such beef quality traits as colour, tenderness, and cooling loss. The aim of this study was evaluation of the post-mortem changes in bovine meat during aging, quantitative analysis of glycogen and lactic acid, as well as examination of their impact on technological and sensory quality of selected muscles from Holstein-Friesian × Limousin breed carcasses.

Material and Methods: The study included three muscles of different metabolic qualities and sarcomere length: m. semitendinosus, m. longissimus dorsi, and m. psoas major, collected from nine bull carcasses aged 24 ±2 months.

Results: Significant correlations were found between the volume of cooling loss on individual days of aging and the pH value of muscle tissue, lactic acid and glycogen content, as well as beef lightness. However, no significant dependency between the volume of glycogen and the intensity of red and yellow colours was detected.

Conclusion: The colorimetric analysis of glycogen and lactic acid can be an effective tool in predicting the quality of beef.

Keywords: beef; glycogen; lactic acid; pH; shear force

References

  • 1. Abril M., Campo M.M., Önenę A., Saňudo C., Alberti P., Negueruela A.I.: Beef colour evolution as a function of ultimate pH. Meat Sci 2000, 58, 69–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 2. Coombes S.V., Gardner G.E., Pethick D.W., McGilchrist P.: The impact of beef cattle temperament assessed using flight speed on muscle glycogen, muscle lactate and plasma lactate concentrations at slaughter. Meat Sci 2014, 98, 815–821.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 3. Cross H.R., West R.L., Dutson T.R.: Comparison of methods for measuring sarcomere length in beef semitendinosus muscle. Meat Sci 1981, 5, 261–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4. Díaz M.T., Vieira C., Pérez C., Lauzurica S., González de Chávarri E., Sánchez M., De la Fuente J.: Effect of lairage time (0 h, 3 h, 6 h or 12 h) on glycogen content and meat quality parameters in suckling lambs. Meat Sci 2014, 96, 653–660.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 5. England E.M., Matarneh S.K., Oliver E.M., Apaoblaza A., Scheffler T.L., Gerrard D.E.: Excess glycogen does not resolve high ultimate pH of oxidative muscle. Meat Sci 2015, 114, 95–102.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6. England E.M., Matarneh S.K., Scheffler T.L., Wachet C., Gerrard D.E.: pH inactivation of phosphofructokinase arrests postmortem glycolysis. Meat Sci 2014, 98, 850–857.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 7. Fernandez X., Lefaucheur L., Candek M.: Comparative study of two classifications of muscle fibres: consequences for the photometric determination of glycogen according to fibre type in red and white muscle of pig. Meat Sci 1995, 41, 225–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 8. Hambrecht E., Eissen J.J., Newman D.J., Smits C.H.M., Verstegen M.W.A., den Hartog L.A.: Preslaughter handling effects on pork quality and glycolytic potential in two muscles differing in fiber type composition. J Anim Sci 2005, 83, 900–907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9. Huff-Lonergan E., Baas T.J., Malek M., Dekkers J.C.M., Prusa K., Rothschild M.F.: Correlations among selected pork quality traits. J Anim Sci 2002, 80, 617–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 10. Immonen K., Puolanne E.: Variation of residual glycogenglucose concentration at ultimate pH values below 5.75. Meat Sci 2000, 55, 279–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 11. Immonen K., Ruusunen M., Puolanne E.: Some effects of residual glycogen concentration on the physical and sensory quality of normal pH beef. Meat Sci 2000, 55, 33–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 12. Kyla-Puhju M., Ruusunen M., Puolanne E.: Activity of porcine muscle glycogen debranching enzyme in relation to pH and temperature. Meat Sci 2005, 69, 143–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 13. Lee N., Sharma V., Singh R., Mohan A.: Effects of injection enhancement carrageenan, sea-salt, and potassium lactate on beef longissimus lumborum muscle sensorial characteristics and color stability. J Food Process Technol 2014, 5, 1–9.Google Scholar

  • 14. Maltin C., Balcerzak D., Tilley R., Delday M.: Determinants of meat quality: tenderness. P Nutr Soc 2003, 62, 337–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 15. Młynek K., Janiuk I., Dzido A.: Effect of growth intensity of bulls on the microstructure of musculus longissimus lumborum and meat quality. Acta Vet Brno 2012, 81, 127–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 16. Moczkowska M., Półtorak A., Wierzbicka A.: Impact of the ageing process on the intensity of post mortem proteolysis and tenderness of beef from crossbreeds. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2015, 59, 361–367.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 17. Monin G., Sellier P.: Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: the case of the Hampshire breed. Meat Sci 1985, 13, 49–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 18. Mortimer S.I., van der Werf J.H.J., Jacob R.H., Hopkins D.L., Pannier L., Pearce K.L., Gardner G.E., Warner R.D., Geesink G.H., Hocking Edwards J.E., Ponnampalami E.N., Ball A.J., Gilmour A.R., Pethick D.W.: Genetic parameters for meat quality traits of Australian lamb meat. Meat Sci 2014, 96, 1016–1024.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 19. Półtorak A., Wyrwisz J., Moczkowska M., Marcinkowska-Lesiak M., Stelmasiak A., Rafalska U., Wierzbicka A., Da-Wen Sun.: Microwave heating of bovine gluteus medius muscle: impact on selected physical properties of final product and cooking yield. Int J Food Sci Technol 2014, 50, 958–965.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 20. Przybylski W., Monin G., Koćwin-Podsiadła M., Krzęcio E.: Glycogen metabolism in muscle and its effects on meat quality in pigs – a mini review. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 2006, 3, 257–262.Google Scholar

  • 21. Pӧso A.R., Puolanne E.: Carbohydrate metabolism in meat animals. Meat Sci 2005, 70, 423–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 22. Ryu Y.C., Kim B.C.: Comparison of histochemical characteristics in various pork groups categorized by postmortem metabolic rate and pork quality. J Anim Sci 2006, 84, 894–901.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 23. Scheffler T.L., Gerrard D.E.: Mechanisms controlling pork quality development: The biochemistry controlling postmortem energy metabolism. Meat Sci 2007, 77, 7–16.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 24. Šimek J., Vorlova L., Malota L., Steinhauserova I., Steinhauser L.: Post-mortal changes of pH value and lactic acid content in the muscles of pigs and bulls. Czech J Anim Sci 2003, 48, 295–299.Google Scholar

  • 25. Strydom P.E., Frylinck L., Montgomery J.L., Smith M.F.: The comparison of three β-agonists for growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of feedlot cattle. Meat Sci 2009, 81, 557–564.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 26. Vestergaard M., Therkildsen M., Henckel P., Jensen L.R., Andersen H.R., Sejrsen K.: Influence of feeding intensity, grazing and finishing feeding on meat and eating quality of young bulls and the relationship between muscle fibre characteristics, fibre fragmentation and meat tenderness. Meat Sci 2000, 54, 187–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 27. Wegner J., Albrecht E., Fiedler I., Teuscher F., Papstein H.J., Ender K.: Growth- and breed-related changes of muscle fiber characteristics in cattle. J Anim Sci 2000, 78, 1485–1496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 28. Young O.A., West J., Hart A.L., van Otterdijk F.F.H.: A method for early determination of meat ultimate pH. Meat Sci 2004, 66, 493–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 29. Żelechowska E., Przybylski W., Jaworska D., Sante-Lhoutellier V.: Technological and sensory pork quality in relation to muscle and drip loss protein profiles. Eur Food Res Technol 2012, 234, 883–894.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-03-20

Accepted: 2016-09-02

Published Online: 2016-09-23

Published in Print: 2016-09-01


Citation Information: Journal of Veterinary Research, Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 301–307, ISSN (Online) 2450-8608, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2016-0046.

Export Citation

© 2016 Anna Onopiuk et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Anna Onopiuk, Andrzej Półtorak, and Agnieszka Wierzbicka
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2018, Page e13619
[2]
Anna Onopiuk, Andrzej Półtorak, Da-Wen Sun, and Agnieszka Wierzbicka
Journal of Food Process Engineering, 2017, Page e12596
[3]
Małgorzata Moczkowska, Andrzej Półtorak, and Agnieszka Wierzbicka
International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2017, Volume 52, Number 6, Page 1375
[4]
Małgorzata Moczkowska, Andrzej Półtorak, Magdalena Montowska, Edward Pospiech, and Agnieszka Wierzbicka
Meat Science, 2017, Volume 130, Page 7

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in