Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Veterinary Research

formerly Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2016: 0.462

CiteScore 2016: 0.46

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.230
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.383

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Comparison of albendazole cytotoxicity in terms of metabolite formation in four model systems

Lidia Radko
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Maria Minta
  • Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Piotr Jedziniak
  • Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Sylwia Stypuła-Trębas
  • Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-09-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2017-0042


Introduction: Albendazole is used to treat endoparasitic diseases in animals and humans. After oral administration, it is quickly oxidised into its pharmacologically active metabolite albendazole sulfoxide and then to sulfone. However, it is not clear which compound is responsible for toxic effects towards mammalian cells. Material and Methods: The model systems comprised cultures of isolated rat hepatocytes, two hepatoma cell lines (FaO, HepG2), and non-hepatic Balb/c 3T3 line. Cells were exposed for 24, 48, and 72 h to eight concentrations of albendazole ranging from 0.05 to 100 μg/mL. At all three time points cytotoxic effects were assessed by MTT assay and metabolites in the culture media were determined by LC-MS/MS analysis. Results: The effective concentrations EC50-72h showed that Balb/c 3T3 cells were the most sensitive to albendazole (0.2 ±0.1 μg/mL) followed by FaO (1.0 ±0.4 μg/mL), and HepG2 (6.4 ±0.1 μg/mL). In the case of isolated hepatocytes this value could not be attained up to the highest concentration used. Chemical analysis revealed that the concentrations of albendazole in hepatocytes and HepG2 and FaO culture media gradually decreased with incubation time, while the concentrations of its metabolites increased. The metabolism in isolated hepatocytes was dozens of times greater than in HepG2 and FaO cells. Two metabolites (albendazole sulfoxide, albendazole sulfone) were detected in isolated hepatocytes and HepG2 culture medium, one (albendazole sulfoxide) in FaO culture medium and none in Balb/c 3T3. Conclusion: The obtained data indicate that metabolism of albendazole leads to its detoxification. The lower cytotoxic potential of metabolites was confirmed in the independent experiments in this study.

Keywords: rat hepatocytes; albendazole; metabolites; cytotoxicity; cell lines


  • 1. Baillie T.A.: Metabolism and toxicity of drugs. Two decades of progress in industrial drug metabolism. Chem Res Toxicol 2008, 21, 129-137.Google Scholar

  • 2. Baliharová V., Skálová L., Maas R.F.M., De Vrieze G., Bull S., Fink-Gremmels J.: The effects of benzimidazole anthelmintics on P4501A in rat hepatocytes and HepG2 cells. Res Vet Sci 2003, 75, 61-69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 3. Capece B.P.S., Navarro M., Arcalis T., Castells G., Toribio L., Perez F., Carretero A., Ruberte J., Arboix M., Cristòfol C.: Albendazole sulphoxide enantiomers in pregnant rats embryo concentrations and developmental toxicity. Vet J 2003, 165, 266-275.Google Scholar

  • 4. Capece B.P.S., Virkel G.L., Lanusse C.E.: Enantiomeric behaviour of albendazole and fenbendazole sulfoxides in domestic animals: pharmacological implications. Vet J 2009, 181, 241-250.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 5. Capleton A.C., Courage C., Rumsby P., Holmes P., Stutt E., Boxall B.A., Levy L.S.: Prioritising veterinary medicines according to their potential indirect human exposure and toxicity profile. Toxicol Lett 2006, 163, 213-223.Google Scholar

  • 6. Castell J.V., Jover R., Martinez-Jiménez C.P., Gómez- Lechón M.J.: Hepatocyte cell lines: their use, scope, and limitations in drug metabolism studies. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2006, 2, 183-212.Google Scholar

  • 7. Coecke S., Ahr H., Blaauboer B.J., Bremer S., Castell J., Combes R., Corvi R., Crespi C.L., Cunningham M.L., Elaut G., Eletti B., Freidiq A., Gennari A., Ghersi-Egea J.F., Guillouzo A., Hartung T., Hoet P., Ingelman-Sundberg M., Munn S., Janssens W., Ladstetter B., Leahy D., Long A., Meneguz A., Monshouwer M., Morath S., Nagelkerke F., Pelkonen O., Ponti J., Prieto P., Richert L., Sabbioni E., Schaack B., Steiling W., Testai E., Vericat J.A., Worth A.: Metabolism: a bottleneck in in vitro toxicological test development. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 54. Altern Lab Anim 2006, 34, 49-84.Google Scholar

  • 8. Cristòfol C., Navarro M., Franquelo C., Valladares J.E., Carretero A., Ruberte J., Arboix M.: Disposition of netobimin, albendazole, and its metabolites in the pregnant rat: developmental toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1997, 144, 56-61. 9. Dayan A.D.: Albendazole, mebendazole, and praziquantel. Review of non-clinical toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Acta Trop 2003, 86, 141-159. Google Scholar

  • 10. Delatour P., Benoit E., Besse S., Boukraa A.: Comparative enantioselectivity in the sulphoxidation of albendazole in man, dogs, and rats. Xenobiotica 1991, 21, 217-221.Google Scholar

  • 11. Delatour P., Benoit E., Caude M., Tambute A.: Species differences in the generation of the chiral sulfoxide metabolite of albendazole in sheep and rats. Chirality 1990, 2, 156-160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 12. Delatour P.: Some aspects of the teratogenicity of veterinary drugs. Vet Res Commun 1983, 7, 125-131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 13. Donato M.T., Jover R., Gómez- Lechón M.J.: Hepatic cell lines for drug hepatotoxicity testing: limitations and strategies to upgrade their metabolic competence by gene engineering. Curr Drug Metab 2013, 14, 946-968.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 14. Donato M.T., Lahoz A., Castell J.V., Gómez-Lechón M.J.: Cell lines: a tool for in vitro drug metabolism studies. Curr Drug Metab 2008, 9, 1-11.Google Scholar

  • 15. European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA). Albendazole (Extrapolation to all ruminants) Summary Report. EMEA/MRL/865/03-Final. 2004. Available from: http://www.emea.eu.int.Google Scholar

  • 16. Gad S.C.: Active drug metabolites in drug development. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2003, 3, 98-100.Google Scholar

  • 17. Hennessy D.R., Sangster N.C., Steel J.W., Collins G.H.: Comparative pharmacokinetic behavior of albendazole in sheep and goats. Int J Parasitol 1993, 23, 321-325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 18. Křižová-Forstová V., Lamka J., Cvilink V., Hanušová V., Skálová L.: Factors affecting pharmacokinetics of benzimidazole anthelmintics in food-producing animals: the consequences and potential risks. Res Vet Sci 2011, 91, 333-341.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 19. Mosmann T.: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 1983, 65, 55-63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 20. Radko L., Minta M., Stypuła-Trębas S.: Differential toxicities of albendazole and its two main metabolites to Balb/c 3T3, HepG2, FaO lines and rat hepatocytes. J Vet Res 2016, 60, 495-502.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 21. Rodriges R.M., Bouhifd M., Bories G., Sacco M.G., Gribaldo L., Fabbri M., Coecke S., Whelan M.P.: Assessment of an automated in vitro basal cytotoxicity test system based on metabolically-competent cells. Toxicol in Vitro 2013, 27, 760-767.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 22. Rolin S., Souhaili-el Amri H., Batt A.M., Levy M., Bagrel D., Siest G.: Study of the in vitro bioactivation of albendazole in human liver microsomes and hepatoma cell lines. Cell Biol Toxicol 1989, 5, 1-14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 23. Schoonen W.G.E.J., de Roos J.A.D.M., Westerink W.M.A., Débiton E.: Cytotoxic effects of 110 reference compounds on HepG2 cells and for 60 compounds on HeLa, ECC-1, and CHO cells. II Mechanistic assays on NAD(P)H, ATP and DNA contents. Toxicol in Vitro 2005, 19, 491-503.Google Scholar

  • 24. Schoonen W.G.E.J., Westerink W.M.A., de Roos J.A.D.M., Débiton E.: Cytotoxic effects of 100 reference compounds on HepG2 and HeLa cells and of 60 compounds on ECC-1 and CHO cells. I Mechanistic assays on ROS, glutathione depletion, and calcein uptake. Toxicol in Vitro 2005, 19, 505-516.Google Scholar

  • 25. Seglen P.O.: Preparation of isolation rat liver cells. Methods Cell Biol 1976, 13, 29-83.Google Scholar

  • 26. Teruel M.T., Felipe A.E., Solana H.D., Sallovitz J.M., Lanusse C.E.: Placental and fetal toxicity of albendazole sulphoxide in Wistar rats. Vet Hum Toxicol 2003, 45, 131-136. Google Scholar

  • 27. The Joint FAO/WHO Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Albendazole: in Evaluation of Certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. Thirty-fourth Report of the Joint WHO/FAO Expert Committee on Food Additive, WHO, Geneva, 1989, pp. 14-19. Available from: http://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminantsjecfa-database/chemical.aspx?chemID=478Google Scholar

  • 28. Wang K., Shindoh H., Inoue T., Horii I.: Advantages of in vitro cytotoxicity testing by using primary rat hepatocytes in comparison with established cell lines. J Toxicol Sci 2002, 27, 229-237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 29. Wilk-Zasadna I., Bernasconi C., Pelkonen O., Coecke S.: Biotransformation in vitro: an essential consideration in the quantitative in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) of toxicity data. Toxicology 2015, 332, 8-19.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-02-02

Accepted: 2017-08-18

Published Online: 2017-09-19

Published in Print: 2017-09-26

Citation Information: Journal of Veterinary Research, Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 313–319, ISSN (Online) 2450-8608, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2017-0042.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in