Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Veterinary Research

formerly Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2016: 0.462

CiteScore 2016: 0.46

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.230
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.383

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2450-8608
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Hoof quality of Anglo-Arabian and Haflinger horses

Roberto Tocci
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences – Animal Science Section University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Clara Sargentini
  • Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences – Animal Science Section University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Andrea Martini
  • Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences – Animal Science Section University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Luisa Andrenelli
  • Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences – Animal Science Section University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Antonio Pezzati
  • Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences – Animal Science Section University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Doria Benvenuti
  • Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences – Animal Science Section University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Alessandro Giorgetti
  • Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences – Animal Science Section University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-09-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2017-0049

Abstract

Introduction: Foot quality is essential to the horse’s movement. The barefoot approach favours the animal’s welfare. Environment and selection determine hoof characteristics. Material and Methods: Hoof characteristics of eight Anglo-Arabian (AA) and nine Haflinger (HA) horses were studied. After a preliminary visual analysis of feet, nail samples were collected after trimming for physico-chemical analysis. The parameters were submitted to analysis of variance. A principal component analysis and a Pearson correlation were used to compare mineral contents. Results: The hooves of both breeds were healthy and solid. The hooves of HA horses were longer than those of AA horses (14.90 ±0.30 cm vs 13.10 ±0.60 cm), while the AA hoof was harder than the HA hoof both in the wall (74.55 ±2.95 H vs 60.18 ±2.67 H) and sole (67.00 ±5.87 H vs 43.0 ±4.76 H). In comparison with the sole, the AA hoof wall also had a lower moisture percentage (12.56 ±0.67% vs 20.64 ±0.76%), while crude protein and ash contents were similar in both regions. The AA hoof showed a higher Se content, while the HA hoof had a higher level of macroelements. The negative correlations of K with Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, and Zn in the AA hoof may indicate osmoregulation activity. Conclusion: The hoof morphology of AA and HA horses met the literature parameters for mesomorphic horses. Both breeds had healthy and well-conformed hooves, useful for sport and recreation activities.

Keywords: horse; Anglo-Arabian; Haflinger; hoof; physico-chemical properties

References

  • 1. A.N.AC.R.HA.I.: Il cavallo Haflinger nel paese di origine. Available in: http://www.haflinger.it/test/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=111&lang=it,2017.Google Scholar

  • 2. Bentley P.J.: Endocrines and osmoregulation. A comparative account in vertebrates. Springer Science & Business Media, Nedlands, Western Australia, 2002.Google Scholar

  • 3. Bertram J.E.A., Gosline J.M.: Functional design of horse hoof keratin: the modulation of mechanical properties through hydration effects. J Exp Biol 1987, 130, 121-136.Google Scholar

  • 4. Budras K.D., Geyer H.: Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen über abnorm verändertes Horn in der Schutzschicht des Pferdehufes. Anat Histol Embryol 1989, 18, 268.Google Scholar

  • 5. Catalano A.L.: Valutazione morfo-funzionale del cavallo Igiene ed Etnologia. Goliardica Editrice, Noceto (PR), Italy, 1984.Google Scholar

  • 6. Clarendon T.: The foot of the horse; its structure and functions: with the means preserving its healthy action and of its diseases, by a new method of shoeing. In: The Anatomy of the Horse’s Foot and Hoof - A collection of historical articles on the physiology and the function of the foot and hoof. Varios, Read books Ltd, Evesham St, Redditch, United Kingdom, 2011.Google Scholar

  • 7. Coenen M., Spitzlei S.: Zur Zusammensetzung des Hufhorns in Abhängigkeit von Alter, Rasse und Hufhornqualität. Pferdeheilkunde 1996, 12, 279-283.Google Scholar

  • 8. Corley K., Stephen J.: The Equine Hospital Manual. Wiley- Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2008.Google Scholar

  • 9. Faria G.A., Rezende A.S.C., Sampaio I.B.M., Lana A.M.Q., Moura R.S., Madureira J.S., Resende M.C.:Composição quimica dos cascos de eqűinos das raças Pantaneira e Mangalarga Marchador. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2005, 57, 697-701.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 10. Gandini G.C., Samorè A., Pagnacco G.: Genetic contribution of the Arabian to the Italian Haflinger horse. J Anim Breed Genet 1997, 114, 457-464. Google Scholar

  • 11. Kaiser H.F.: The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 1960, 20, 141-151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 12. Kellon E.M.: Feeding the hoof. Equine nutritional solutions. Ephrata, Pennsylvania, USA 2008.Google Scholar

  • 13. Ley W.B., Scott Pleasant R., Dunnington E.A.: Effects of season and diet on tensile strength and mineral content of the equine hoof wall. Equine Vet J 1998, 26, 46-50.Google Scholar

  • 14. Łuszczyński J., Pieszka M., Durmała A., Pisarczyk W., Augustyn R., Długosz B.: Frequency of hoof conformation faults and disorders in horses of several breeds. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2015, 39, 594-599. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 15. Lynghaug F.: The Official Horse Breeds Standards Guide: the Complete Guide to the Standards of All North American Equine Breed Associations. Minneapolis, USA, 2009.Google Scholar

  • 16. Martillotti F., Antongiovanni M., Rizzi L., Santi E., Bittante G.: Metodi di analisi per la valutazione degli alimenti d’impiego zootecnico. Quaderni metodologici n 8. Rome, Italy CNR-IPRA, 1987.Google Scholar

  • 17. Muelling C.K.W. Nutritional influences on horn quality and hoof health. WCDS Adv Dairy Technol 2009, 21, 283-291.Google Scholar

  • 18. Pütz A.C.: Monitoring of seasonal influences, the effect of housing conditions and domestication on the horn quality of the equine hoof. PhD Thesis, Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin. Digitale Dissertationen der FU Berlin, Germany, 2006.Google Scholar

  • 19. Roghi, M. Niente piede niente cavallo. Purosangue Arabo, marzo-giugno. Book of Abstracts, 19th Congress, Cremona 1995.Google Scholar

  • 20. Sáez A.G., Lozano E., Zaldívar-Riverón A.: Evolutionary history of Na, K-ATPases and their osmoregulatory role. Genetica 2010, 136, 479-490.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 21. Sargentini C., Tocci R., Andrenelli L., Giorgetti A.: Preliminary studies on hoof characteristics in Amiata donkey. Ital J Anim Sci 2012, 11, 123-127.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 22. SAS Institute Inc. JMP, Cary, USA, 2013.Google Scholar

  • 23. Skibniewska E.M., Skibniewski M., Kośla T., Kołnierzak M. Concentrations of zinc, cadmium and lead in the hoof horn of the European bison (Bison bonasus bonasus). Ochr Srod Zas Nat 2015, 3, 32-35.Google Scholar

  • 24. Smith Thomas H.: Understanding Equine Hoof Care: Your Guide to Horse Health Care and Management. Eclipse Press, Lexington, 2010.Google Scholar

  • 25. Souza A.F., Kunz J.R., Laus R., Moreira M.A., Muller T.R., Fonteque J.H.: Biometrics of hoof balance in equids. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2016, 68, 825-831.Google Scholar

  • 26. Stachurska A., Kolstrung R., Pięta M., Silmanowicz P., Klimorowska A.: Differentiation between fore and hind hoof dimensions in the horse (Equus caballus). Arch Tierz 2008, 51, 531-540.Google Scholar

  • 27. Stachurska A., Walkuska G., Cebera M., Jaworski Z., Chalabis- Mazurek A.: Heavy metal status of Polish Konik horses from stable-pasture and outdoor maintenance systems in the Masurian environment. J Elementol 2011, 16, 623-633.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 28. Strasser H.: A lifetime of soundness, Ed & Trans. Sabine Kell, Qualicum Beach BC, Canada 2000.Google Scholar

  • 29. Tocci R., Sargentini C., Benedettini A., Benvenuti D., Pezzati A., Giorgetti A.: Physical and chemical properties on hoof of different equine breeds. In: Proceedings of the 12th Congress dedicated to new findings in equine practice. Druento, Italy, 2010, pp. 62-65.Google Scholar

  • 30. Tocci R., Sargentini C., Martini A., Giorgetti A.: Qualitative hoof characteristics in Anglo-Arabian horses and Monterufoli ponies reared in the same farm. Global J Anim Scient Res 2015, 3, 20-29.Google Scholar

  • 31. Warren Evans J.: Horse breeding and management. The Netherlands Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1992.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-04-20

Accepted: 2017-08-18

Published Online: 2017-09-19

Published in Print: 2017-09-26


Citation Information: Journal of Veterinary Research, Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 367–373, ISSN (Online) 2450-8608, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2017-0049.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in