Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Kant-Studien

Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft

Ed. by Baum, Manfred / Dörflinger, Bernd / Klemme, Heiner F.

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.14

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.163
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.224

Online
ISSN
1613-1134
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 92, Issue 3 (Sep 2001)

Issues

Bernard Bolzano, Analyticity and the Aristotelian Model of Science

Willem R de Jong
Published Online: 2008-02-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.92.3.328

Abstract

Quine's well-known ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ (1951) plays a key role in the debate about the analytic-synthetic distinction. Taking to task the ideas of Carnap in particular, Quine shows that logical positivism works with a concept of scientific rationality that is based dogmatically on, among other things, the opposition analytic-synthetic.

About the article

Published Online: 2008-02-28

Published in Print: 2001-09-24


Citation Information: Kant Studien, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.92.3.328.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Arianna Betti and Hein van den Berg
British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2014, Volume 22, Number 4, Page 812
[3]
Sandra Lapointe
Synthese, 2010, Volume 174, Number 2, Page 263
[4]
Willem R. de Jong and Arianna Betti
Synthese, 2010, Volume 174, Number 2, Page 185

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in