Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Kant-Studien

Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft

Ed. by Baum, Manfred / Dörflinger, Bernd / Klemme, Heiner F.

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.14

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.163
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.224

Online
ISSN
1613-1134
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 100, Issue 3

Issues

Kant's Conception of Human Dignity

Oliver Sensen
Published Online: 2009-09-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/KANT.2009.018

Abstract

In this article I argue that Kant's conception of dignity is commonly misunderstood. On the basis of a few passages in the Grundlegung scholars often attribute to Kant a view of dignity as an absolute inner value all human beings possess. However, a different picture emerges if one takes into account all the passages in which Kant uses ‘dignity’. I shall argue that Kant's conception of dignity is a more Stoic one: He conceives of dignity as sublimity (Erhabenheit) or the highest elevation of something over something else. ‘Dignity’ expresses that something is ‘raised above’ all else. What it is raised above, and in virtue of what, depends on the context in which Kant uses ‘dignity’. For instance, he talks about the dignity of a monarch to refer to his rank as the ruler of his subjects. When Kant refers to the dignity of humanity, he expresses the view that human beings have a prerogative over the rest of nature in virtue of being free. What Kant is saying in the famous Grundlegung passage on dignity is that morality is raised above other determinations of will in that morality alone should be valued unconditionally. In unfolding the complicated usage of ‘dignity’ in Kant's works, my reading helps to bring out the coherence of his ethics.

Key words:: Absolute value; dignitas; human dignity; Menschenwürde; Würde

About the article

Published Online: 2009-09-15

Published in Print: 2009-09-01


Citation Information: Kant-Studien, Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 309–331, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/KANT.2009.018.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Somogy Varga
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2016, Volume 19, Number 5, Page 1131
[3]
Andrew Harlem
Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2015, Volume 25, Number 4, Page 452
[4]
Jill Graper Hernandez
HEC Forum, 2015, Volume 27, Number 3, Page 249
[7]
Eva Weber-Guskar
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2013, Volume 61, Number 1, Page 109
[8]
Jaakko Kuosmanen
Res Publica, 2013, Volume 19, Number 2, Page 103
[9]
HOUSTON SMIT and MARK TIMMONS
The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2011, Volume 49, Number 4, Page 295
[10]
Margit Ruffing
Kant-Studien, 2011, Volume 102, Number 4
[11]
ANA MARTA GONZÁLEZ
Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2011, Volume 45, Number 3, Page 433

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in