Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft

Ed. by Baum, Manfred / Dörflinger, Bernd / Klemme, Heiner F.

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2017: 0.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.596

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 101, Issue 3


Kant's Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy – How Public Right ‘Concludes’ Private Right in the “Doctrine of Right”

Helga Varden
Published Online: 2011-01-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.2010.021


Contrary to the received view, I argue that Kant, in the “Doctrine of Right”, outlines a third, republican alternative to absolutist and voluntarist conceptions of political legitimacy. According to this republican alternative, a state must meet certain institutional requirements before political obligations arise. An important result of this interpretation is not only that there are institutional restraints on a legitimate state's use of coercion, but also that the rights of the state (‘public right’) are not in principle reducible to the rights of individuals (‘private right’). Thus, for Kant, political obligations are intimately linked to the existence of a certain kind of republican institutional framework.

Keywords:: justice; republicanism; legitimacy

About the article

Published Online: 2011-01-24

Published in Print: 2010-10-01

Citation Information: Kant-Studien, Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages 331–351, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.2010.021.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Rafeeq Hasan
European Journal of Philosophy, 2018
Pauline Kleingeld
Kantian Review, 2014, Volume 19, Number 02, Page 267
Susan V. H. Castro
Journal of Business Ethics, 2014, Volume 121, Number 4, Page 593
Helga Varden
Kantian Review, 2012, Volume 17, Number 02, Page 327

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in