Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Kant-Studien

Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft

Ed. by Baum, Manfred / Dörflinger, Bernd / Klemme, Heiner F.

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.596

Online
ISSN
1613-1134
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 104, Issue 3

Issues

Kant and the Explanatory Role of Experience

Anil Gomes
Published Online: 2013-09-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2013-0020

Abstract: We are able to think of empirical objects as capable of existing unperceived. What explains our grasp of this conception of objects? In this paper I examine the claim that experience explains our understanding of objects as capable of existing unperceived with reference to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. I argue that standard accounts of experience’s explanatory role are unsatisfactory, but that an alternative account can be extracted from the first Critique – one which relies on Kant’s transcendental idealism.

: experience; unperceived existence; perception

About the article

Published Online: 2013-09-01

Published in Print: 2013-09-01


Citation Information: Kant-Studien, Volume 104, Issue 3, Pages 277–300, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2013-0020.

Export Citation

© De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Anil Gomes
Mind, 2016, Page fzw009

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in