Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Kant-Studien

Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft

Ed. by Baum, Manfred / Dörflinger, Bernd / Klemme, Heiner F.

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.596

Online
ISSN
1613-1134
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 106, Issue 1

Issues

Bemerkungen zu Oliver Sensen, Kant on Human Dignity, Chapter 1

Dieter Schönecker
Published Online: 2015-03-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2015-0005

Abstract:

In this paper I sketchily deal with some critical points concerning the first chapter of Oliver Sensen’s book, Kant on Human Dignity. These points are as follows: (i) Sensen interprets only a few passages in any great detail; (ii) where we do encounter more precise analysis, Sensen suggests that human beings are to be respected just because one must respect them; (iii) Sensen criticizes a position (according to which Kant has a concept of value that is independent of the moral law) that is obviously wrong and, in any case, not the crucial point; (iv) Sensen misconceives the function of respect as something that grounds knowledge; (v) he is wrong to consider freedom a non-normative concept; (vi) he does not sufficiently clarify the precise meaning of “metaphysical”; (vii) section III of the Groundwork is virtually ignored; and (viii) Sensen overlooks the fact that the relational property (ist erhoben über) is based on an intrinsic property (hat Würde).

Keywords:: dignity; metaphysical; value

About the article

Published Online: 2015-03-20

Published in Print: 2015-03-20


Citation Information: Kant-Studien, Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 68–77, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2015-0005.

Export Citation

© De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in