Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Mohr, Georg

Kant Yearbook

Editor-in-Chief: Heidemann, Dietmar

Editorial Board: Allison, Henry E. / Ameriks, Karl / Brittan, Gordon G. / Düsing, Klaus / Dahlstrom, Daniel O. / Dyck, Corey W. / Engelhard, Kristina / Falkenburg, Brigitte / Ginsborg, Hannah / Gilmore-Grier, Michelle / Grundmann, Thomas / Guyer, Paul / Hanna, Robert / Kreimendahl, Lothar / Nuzzo, Angelica / Stern, Robert / Sturma, Dieter / Theis, Robert / Westphal, Kenneth R. / Willaschek, Marcus

CiteScore 2017: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.104
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.913

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Hidden Antinomies of Practical Reason, and Kant’s Religion of Hope

Rachel Zuckert
Published Online: 2018-10-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2018-0010


In the Critique of Practical Reason, Kant argues that morality obliges us to believe in the immortality of the soul and the existence of God. I argue, however, that in two late essays – “The End of All Things” and “On the Miscarriage of all Philosophical Trials in Theodicy” – Kant provides moral counterarguments to that position: these beliefs undermine moral agency by giving rise to fanaticism or fatalism. Thus, I propose, the Kantian position on the justification of religious belief is ultimately antinomial. One ought, moreover, to understand Kant’s considered position concerning the immortality of the soul and the existence of God to be similar to that he proposes concerning the theoretical ideas of reason in the Appendix to the Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason: they are necessary as regulative ideas guiding moral action, not endorsed or even postulated as propositions. In other words, they are subject matters not of belief, but of hope.


  • Auxter, Thomas (1979): The Unimportance of Kant’s Highest Good, in: Journal of the History of Philosophy 17, pp. 121 – 134.Google Scholar

  • Beck, Lewis White (1960). A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago.Google Scholar

  • Brachtendorf, Johannes (2002): Kants Theodizee-Aufsatz – Die Bedingungen des Gelingens philosophischer Theodizee, in: Kant-Studien 93, pp. 57 – 83.Google Scholar

  • Ebels-Duggan, Kyla (2016): The Right and the Good, and the Threat of Despair: Kantian Ethics and the Need for Hope in God, in: Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion 7, pp. 81 – 109.Google Scholar

  • Engstrom, Stephen (1992): The Concept of the Highest Good in Kant’s Moral Theory, in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, pp. 747 – 780.Google Scholar

  • Kühn, Manfred (2001). Kant: A Biography, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Mariña, Jacqueline (2000): Making Sense of Kant’s Highest Good, in: Kant-Studien 91, pp. 329 – 55.Google Scholar

  • Murphy, Jeffrie (1965): The Highest Good as Content for Kant’s Ethical Formalism: Beck versus Silber, in: Kant-Studien 56, pp. 102 – 110.Google Scholar

  • Reath, Andrews (1988): Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant, in: Journal of the History of Philosophy 26, pp. 593 – 619.Google Scholar

  • Silber, John (1959): Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good as Immanent and Transcendent, in: Philosophical Review 68, pp. 469 – 92.Google Scholar

  • Wood, Allen (1960). Kant’s Moral Religion, Ithaca.Google Scholar

  • Zuckert, Rachel (2010): Kant on Practical Fanaticism, in: B. Lipscomb and J. Krueger (eds.): Kant’s Moral Metaphysics, Berlin, pp. 291 – 318.Google Scholar

  • Zuckert, Rachel (2017): Kantian Ideas of Reason and Empirical Scientific Investigation, in: M. Massimi and A. Breitenbach (eds.): Kant and the Laws of Nature, Cambridge, pp. 89 – 107.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-10-04

Citation Information: Kant Yearbook, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 199–217, ISSN (Online) 1868-4602, ISSN (Print) 1868-4599, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2018-0010.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in