Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Laboratory Phonology

Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology

Ed. by Cole, Jennifer

IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.667
Rank 85 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

More options …

Lexical function of pitch in the first language shapes cross-linguistic perception of Thai tones

Vance Schaefer / Isabelle Darcy
Published Online: 2014-11-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014-0016


Determining the factors involved in the non-native perception of the pitch patterns of tones is complicated by the fact that all languages use pitch to various extents, whether linguistic (e.g., intonation) or non-linguistic (e.g., singing). Moreover, many languages use pitch to distinguish lexical items with varying degrees of functional load and differences in inventory of such pitch patterns. The current study attempts to understand what factors determine accurate naïve (= non-learner) perception of non-native tones, in order to establish the baseline for acquisition of a tonal L2. We examine the perception of Thai tones (i.e., three level tones, two contour tones) by speakers of languages on a spectrum of lexically contrastive pitch usage: Mandarin (lexical tone), Japanese (lexical pitch accent), English (lexical stress), and Korean (no lexically contrastive pitch). Results suggest that the importance of lexically contrastive pitch in the L1 influences non-native tone perception so that not all non-tonal language speakers possess the same level of tonal sensitivity, resulting in a hierarchy of perceptual accuracy. Referencing the Feature Hypothesis (McAllister et al. 2002), we propose the Functional Pitch Hypothesis to model our findings: the degree to which linguistic pitch differentiates lexical items in the L1 shapes the naïve perception of a non-native lexically contrastive pitch system, e.g., tones.

Keywords: non-native tone perception; lexically contrastive pitch; prominence; pitch accent; word stress

About the article

Published Online: 2014-11-29

Published in Print: 2014-11-01

Citation Information: Laboratory Phonology, Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 489–522, ISSN (Online) 1868-6354, ISSN (Print) 1868-6346, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014-0016.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Munich/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Mark Antoniou and Jessica L. L. Chin
Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, Volume 9
Guri Bordal Steien and Wim A van Dommelen
International Journal of Bilingualism, 2016, Page 136700691667321
Stefanie Ramachers, Susanne Brouwer, and Paula Fikkert
Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, Volume 8

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in