Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Law and Development Review

Editor-in-Chief: Lee, Y.S.

See all formats and pricing
More options …

What Can Be Expected from International Frameworks to Regulate Large-Scale Land and Water Acquisitions in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Michael Brüntrup / Waltina Scheumann / Axel Berger / Lidija Christmann
  • Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development/Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ), Bonn, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Clara Brandi
Published Online: 2014-07-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2014-0013


This paper explores the use of international governance frameworks as being one of the ways to regulate large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs). LSLAs are currently flourishing in both developed and developing countries, in particular in the sub-Saharan Africa region. Although they can potentially have many positive impacts in rural areas, many LSLAs have been shown to mainly produce negative impacts in poor countries with weak national policy and institutional frameworks and poorly defined rights for rural people. To successfully regulate the occurrence of LSLAs and their impacts, it needs to be understood that LSLAs are more complex than they are usually portrayed as being. Some of the complexities pertain to water issues; provenience of investors; legality and legitimacy of acquisitions; as well as the diversity of actors and the people affected. Against this background, five international frameworks are looked at: human rights, voluntary international guidelines, international global water governance regimes and bi-/multilateral river treaties, and voluntary private standards and codes. The paper concludes that the frameworks reviewed provide valuable guidance regarding LSLAs, but no single approach can help in dealing with the multitude of actors, situations, and impacts of LSLAs. Even if they are considered collectively, they can tackle many but not all challenges. Yet, their implementation could substantially improve the process and the impact of LSLAs, including their refusal. A key question is how these frameworks are deployed at the local level. Some rely on translation into national laws and on their implementation, others try to establish a direct linkage between the international and the local level. It is of great interest to study how international frameworks trickle down to local policy arenas, how they are used by stakeholders, and how they are finally shaping conflicts at the local level and affecting their results. In particular, their potential for empowering poor stakeholders should be of interest for research and development.

Keywords: land and water acquisitions; international frameworks; sub-Sahara Africa


  • Acharya, A., How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localisation and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism, 58 International Organisation (2004).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ActionAid, A Brief Introduction to the “Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (June 2012), available at: <http://landportal.info/sites/default/files/actionaid_voluntaryguidelines_guide.pdf>, accessed 9 February 2013.

  • Alden Wily, L., Governance and Land Relations: A Review of Decentralisation of Land Administration and Management in Africa (London: IIED, 2003).Google Scholar

  • Alden Wily, L., Looking Back to See Forward: The Legal Niceties of Land Theft in Land Rushes, 39 Journal of Peasant Studies, no. 3–4 (2012).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alden Wily, L., The Law and Land Grabbing: Friend or Foe, presentation at the 2013 Law and Development Conference “Legal and Development Implications of International Land Acquisitions” (Kyoto, Japan, 31 May 2013).Google Scholar

  • Anseeuw, W., M. Boche, T. Breu, M. Giger, J. Lay, P. Messerli and K. Nolte, Transnational Land Deals for Agriculture in the Global South, analytical report based on the Land Matrix Database (Bern/Montpellier/Hamburg: CDE/CIRAD/GIGA, 2012).Google Scholar

  • Askew, K., F. Maganga and R. Odgaard, Of Land and Legitimacy: A Tale of Two Lawsuits, 83 Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute, no. 1 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baietti, A., A. Shlyakhtenko, R. La Rocca and Urvaksh D. Patel, Green Infrastructure Finance: Leading Initiatives and Research (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012).Google Scholar

  • Berger, A., Do We Really Need a Multilateral Investment Agreement? German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) Briefing Paper 9/2013 (Bonn, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Berger, A., M. Busse, P. Nunnenkamp and M. Roy, Do Trade and Investment Agreements Lead to More FDI? Accounting for Key Provisions Inside the Black Box, 10 International Economics and Economic Policy, no. 2 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berger, A., M. Busse, P. Nunnenkamp and M. RoyBerger, More Stringent BITs, Less Ambiguous Effects on FDI? Not a Bit! 112 Economic Letters (2011).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berger, A. and J. Harten, What Opportunities Do the New EU International Investment Agreements Offer for Developing Countries?, German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Briefing Paper 12/2012 (Bonn, 2012).Google Scholar

  • Berry, S., Questions of Ownership: Proprietorship and Control in a Changing Rural Terrain – A Case Study from Ghana, 83 Africa, no. 1 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boon, J., How Developing Countries Can Adapt Current Bilateral Investment Treaties to Provide Benefits to Their Domestic Economies, 187 Global Business Law Review, no. 1 (2011).Google Scholar

  • Bromley, D.W., Formalising Property Relations in the Developing World: The Wrong Prescription for the Wrong Malady, 26 Land Use Policy, no. 1 (2009).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brüntrup, M., Detrimental Land Grabbing or Growth Poles? Determinants and Potential Development Effects of Foreign Direct Land Investments, 20 Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis, no. 1 (2012).Google Scholar

  • Burnod, P., M. Gingembre and R. Andrianirina, Competition over Authority and Access: International Land Deals in Madagascar, 44 Development and Change, no. 2 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • CFS (Committee on World Food Security), available at: <http://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-home/resaginv/en/>, accessed 6 May 2013.

  • Cernic, J.L., Corporate Human Rights Obligations under Stabilization Clauses, 11 German Law Journal, no. 2 (2010).Google Scholar

  • Chaisse, J., Promises and Pitfalls of the European Union Policy on Foreign Investment. How Will the New EU Competence on FDI Affect the Emerging Global Regime? 15 Journal of International Economic Law, no. 1 (2012).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Checkel, J.T., International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide, 3 European Journal of International Relations, no. 4 (1997).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chu, J, Gender and “Land Grabbing” in Sub-Saharan Africa: Women’s Land Rights and Customary Land Tenure, 54 Development, no. 1 (2011).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Substantive Issues Arising in the Implementation of the ICESCR (General Comment 15: The Right to Water, arts. 11 and 12 of the International Covenant) (20 January 2003).Google Scholar

  • Cotula, L., Land Deals in Africa: What Is in the Contracts? (London: IIED, 2011).Google Scholar

  • Cotula, L., “‘Land Grabbing’ in the Shadow of the Law: Legal Frameworks Regulating the Global Land Rush”, in R. Rayfuse and Nicole Weisfelt (eds.), The Challenge of Food Security (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).Google Scholar

  • Cotula, L., The Great African Land Grab? Agricultural Investments and the Global Food System (London/New York: Zed Books, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Cotula, L., S. Vermeulen, R. Leonard and J. Keeley, Land Grab or Development Opportunity? Agricultural Investment and International Land Deals in Africa (London/Rome: IIED/FAO/IFAD, 2009).Google Scholar

  • Cuffaro, N. and D. Hallam, “Land Grabbing” in Developing Countries: Foreign Investors, Regulation and Codes of Conduct (January 2011), available at: <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1750047_code904191.pdf?abstractid=1744204&mirid=1>, accessed 12 May 2013.

  • De Schutter, O., Large-scale Land Acquisitions and Leases: A Set of Core Principles and Measures to Address the Human Rights Challenge (June 2009), available at: <http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/otherdocuments/20090611_large-scale-land-acquisitions_en.pdf>, accessed 9 February 2013.

  • Deininger, K. and D. Byerlee, Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010).Google Scholar

  • Deininger, K. and G. Feder, Land Registration, Governance, and Development: Evidence and Implications for Policy, 24 The World Bank Research Observer, no. 2 (2009).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dolzer, R., The Impact of International Investment Treaties on Domestic Administrative Law, 37 International Law and Politics, no. 4 (2006).Google Scholar

  • Dolzer, R. and C. Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

  • Donnelly, J., Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (2nd ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

  • Dwyer, M.B., Building the Politics Machine: Tools for ‘Resolving’ the Global Land Grab, 44 Development and Change, no. 2 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Edelman, M., Messy Hectares: Questions about the Epistemology of Land Grabbing Data, 40 Journal of Peasant Studies, no. 3 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • FAO, Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food Security (Rome, 2005).Google Scholar

  • FAO, From Land Grab to Win-Win. Seizing the Opportunities of International Investments in Agriculture (Rome, 2009a).Google Scholar

  • FAO, Guide on Legislating for the Right to Food (Rome, 2009b).Google Scholar

  • FAO, Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (Rome, 2012a).Google Scholar

  • FAO, Governance of Land Tenure. Making It Happen (Rome, 2012b).Google Scholar

  • FAO, Trends and Impacts of Foreign Investment in Developing Country Agriculture – Evidence from Case Studies (Rome, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Falkner, R., Global Governance – The Rise of Non-state Actors, EAA Technical Report 4/2011 (Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2011).Google Scholar

  • Friis, C. and A. Reenberg, Land Grab in Africa: Emerging Land System Drivers in a Teleconnected World, Global Land Project-International Project Office (GLP-IPO), GLP Report no. 1 (University of Copenhagen, 2010).Google Scholar

  • Gallagher, K., Losing Control: Policy Space to Prevent and Mitigate Financial Crises in Trade and Investment Agreements, 29 Development Policy Review, no. 4 (2011).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • German, L., G. Schoneveld and E. Mwangi, Contemporary Processes of Large-scale Land Acquisition by Investors: Case Studies from sub-Saharan Africa, Occasional Paper 68 (Bogor/Indonesia: CIFOR, 2011).Google Scholar

  • Global Reporting Initiative, available at: <https://www.globalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx>, accessed 12 May 2013.

  • GRAIN, Seized: The 2008 Landgrab For Food And Financial Security (October 2008), available at: <http://www.grain.org/article/entries/93-seized-the-2008-landgrab-for-food-and-financial-security>, accessed 6 May 2013.

  • GRAIN, Squeezing Africa Dry: Behind Every Land Grab Is a Water Grab (Barcelona, June 2012), available at: <http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4516-squeezing-africa-dry-behind-every-land-grab-is-a-water-grab>, accessed 21 August 2012.

  • GRAIN, available at: <http://farmlandgrab.org/>, accessed 6 May 2013.

  • Hafner-Burton, E. and K. Tsutsui, Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises, 110 American Journal of Sociology, no. 5 (2005).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hampel-Milagrosa, A. and M. Brüntrup, Land Grabbing and its Gender Implications – What Do We Know So Far, presentation at the 2013 Law and Development Conference “Legal and Development Implications of International Land Acquisitions” (Kyoto, Japan, 31 May 2013).Google Scholar

  • Henson, S. and J. Humphrey, Understanding the Complexities of Private Standards in Global Agri-food Chains As They Impact Developing Countries, 46 The Journal of Development Studies, no. 9 (2010).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herrmann, R., U. Grote and M. Brüntrup, Household Welfare Outcomes of Large-scale Agricultural Investments: Insights from Sugarcane Outgrower Schemes and Estate Employment in Malawi, paper presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty (Washington, DC, 8–11 April 2013), available at: <http://www.conftool.com/landandpoverty2013/index.php/Herrmann-368_paper.pdf?page=downloadPaper&filename=Herrmann-368_paper.pdf&form_id=368&form_version=final>, accessed 6 May 2013.

  • Hertzog, T. et al., Ostrich-Like Strategies in Sahelian Sands? Land and Water Grabbing in the Office du Niger, Mali, 5 Water Alternatives, no. 2 (2012).Google Scholar

  • Hilhorst, T., J. Nelen and N. Traoré, Agrarian Change below the Radar Screen: Rising Farmland Acquisitions by Domestic Investors in West Africa. Results from a Survey in Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger, unpublished paper by the Royal Tropical Institute and SNV (April 2011), available at: <http://m.snvworld.org/sites/www.snvworld.org/files/publications/agrarian_change_under_radar_screen_kit_snv.pdf>, accessed 6 May 2013.

  • Hodgson, S., Land and Water – The Rights Interface, LSP Working Paper 10 (Rome: FAO, 2004).Google Scholar

  • Hofmann, R., C. Tams and S. Schill (eds.), Preferential Trade and Investment Agreements: From Recalibration to Reintegration (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Huggins, C., Rural Water Tenure in East Africa. A Comparative Study of Legal Regimes and Community Responses to Changing Tenure Patterns in Tanzania and Kenya (May 2000).Google Scholar

  • IEA, Recommendations for Improvement of Sustainability Certified Markets, Strategic Inter-Task Study: Monitoring Sustainability Certification of Bioenergy (February 2013), available at: <http://www.bioenergytrade.org/downloads/iea-sust-cert-task-4-final2013.pdf>, accessed 12 May 2013.

  • Jägerskog, A., A. Cascão, M. Hårsmar and K. Kim, Land Acquisitions: How Will They Impact Transboundary Waters?, Report no. 30 (Stockholm: SIWI, 2012).Google Scholar

  • Kennedy, E.T., The Effects of Sugarcane Production on Food Security, Health, and Nutrition in Kenya: A Longitudinal Analysis (Washington, DC: IFPRI, 1989).Google Scholar

  • Knörich, J. and A. Berger, Friends or Foes? Interactions between Indonesia’s International Investment Agreements and National Investment Law, German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Study (Bonn, 2014, Study No. 82).Google Scholar

  • Land Matrix, available at: <http://landportal.info/landmatrix>, accessed 6 May 2013.

  • Maertens, M. and J.F. Swinnen, Trade, Standards, and Poverty: Evidence from Senegal, 37 World Development, no. 1 (2009).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCulloch, N. and M. Ota, Export Horticulture and Poverty in Kenya, Institute of Development Studies Working Paper 174 (Sussex, 2002).Google Scholar

  • Mehta, L., G.J. Veldwisch and J. Franco, Introduction to the Special Issue: Water Grabbing? Focus on the (re)Appropriation of Finite Water Resources, 5 Water Alternatives, no. 2 (2012).Google Scholar

  • Minot, N. and M. Ngigi, Are Horticultural Exports a Replicable Success Story? Evidence from Kenya and Côte d’Ivoire, Conferences Paper no. 7, presented at the InWEnt, IFPRI, NEPAD, CTA conference Successes in African Agriculture (Pretoria, 2003).Google Scholar

  • Newcombe, A. and L. Paradell, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar

  • Nolte, K., Large-scale Agricultural Investments under Poor Land Governance Systems: Actors and Institutions in the Case of Zambia, GIGA Working Papers no. 221 (Hamburg: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Open Contracting, available at: <http://www.open-contracting.org>, accessed 12 May 2013.

  • Oxfam, A Sweeter Future? The potential for EU sugar reform to contribute to poverty reduction in southern Africa (London, 2004).Google Scholar

  • Oxfam, Land and Power: The Growing Scandal Surrounding the New Wave of Investments in Land (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar

  • O’Rourke, D., Multi-Stakeholder Regulation: Privatizing or Socializing Global Labor Standards? 34 World Development, no. 5 (May 2006).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, F., Splash and Grab: The Global Scramble for Water, New Scientist (4 March 2013), available at: <http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21729066.400-splash-and-grab-theglobal-scramble-for-water.html>, accessed 19 April 2013.

  • Peters, P.E., Conflicts Over Land and Threats to Customary Tenure in Africa, African Affairs (2013). Herr Görlt, ich schicke Ihnen den Link, da ich mir nicht sicher bin: http://afraf.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/08/07/afraf.adt047.abstract.Crossref

  • Platteau, J.P., The Evolutionary Theory of Land Rights as Applied to sub‐Saharan Africa: A Critical Assessment, 27 Development and Change, no. 1 (2008).Google Scholar

  • RAI, available at: <http://www.responsibleagroinvestment.org/rai/>, accessed 12 May 2013.

  • Ramazzotti, M., Customary Water Rights and Contemporary Water Legislation, FAO Legal Papers Online 76 (Rome: FAO, 2008).Google Scholar

  • Richards, M., Social and Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Large-scale Land Acquisitions in Africa – With a Focus on West and Central Africa, Rights and Resources Initiative (Washington, DC, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Sauvant, K. and L. Sachs (eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

  • Schaffnit-Chatterjee, C., Foreign Investment in Farmland. No Low-Hanging Fruit, Deutsche Bank research (Frankfurt a. M., November 2012), available at: <http://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000296807/Foreign±investment±in±farmlandpercent3A±No±low-hanging±fruit.PDF>, accessed 9 February 2013.

  • Schlegel, S., T. Kaphengst and S. Cavallieri, Options to Develop a Global Standard-Setting Scheme for Products Derived from Natural Resources (NRS) (Frankfurt/Berlin: WWF Germany and Ecologic, 2008).Google Scholar

  • Schoneveld, G.C., L.A. German and E. Nukator, Towards Sustainable Biofuel Development: Assessing the Local Impacts of Large-scale Foreign Land Acquisitions in Ghana, paper prepared for the World Bank Annual Conference on Land Policy and Administration (Washington, DC, 26–27 April 2010).Google Scholar

  • Scoones, I., R. Hall, S.M. Borras, B. White and W. Wolford, The Politics of Evidence: Methodologies for Understanding the Global Land Rush, 40 Journal of Peasant Studies, no. 3 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sierra Leone Network on the Right to Food, Study Reveals Alarming Facts about Plantation of Addax Bioenergy in Sierra Leone (June 2011), available at: <http://farmlandgrab.org/post/view/18809>, accessed 21 April 2013.

  • Smaller, C. and H. Mann, A Thirst for Distant Lands: Foreign Investment in Agricultural Land and Water, Foreign Investment for Sustainable Development Program, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) (Winnipeg, Canada 2009).Google Scholar

  • United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 993, depositary notification C.N.781.2001.TREATIES-6 of 5 October 2001.Google Scholar

  • United Nations, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, UN Document A/HRC/17/31 (March 2011).Google Scholar

  • U.N. Human Rights Council (HRC), Promotion and Protection of All Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Including the Right to Development: Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/11/13/ (22 April 2009).Google Scholar

  • UN Global Compact SABPs (Sustainable Agriculture Business Principles), available at: <http://www.fairlabor.org/blog/entry/developing-sustainable-agriculture-business-principles-un-global-compact>, accessed 6 May 2013.

  • UNCTAD, The Role of International Investment Agreements in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries (New York/Geneva: United Nations, 2009).Google Scholar

  • UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2012. Towards a New Generation of Investment Policies (New York/Geneva: United Nations, 2012).Google Scholar

  • UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2013. Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development (New York/Geneva: United Nations, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Väth, S., Gaining Neighbours or Disruptive Factors – What Happened When Large-scale Land-based Investment in the Ghanaian Oil Palm Sector Met the Local Population on the Ground?, paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing II (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 17–19 October 2012), available at: <http://www.cornell-landproject.org/download/landgrab2012papers/Vath.pdf>, accessed 31 October 2013.

  • Vermeulen, S. and L. Cotula, Over the Heads of Local People: Consultation, Consent, and Recompense in Large-Scale Land Deals for Biofuels Projects in Africa, 37 The Journal of Peasant Studies, no. 4 (2010).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Von Braun, J. and R.S. Meinzen-Dick, “Land Grabbing” by Foreign Investors in Developing Countries: Risks and Opportunities (Washington, DC: IFPRI, 2009).Google Scholar

  • Von Lossow, T., Machtverschiebung am Nil. Äthiopien und Ägypten begegnen sich im Wasserkonflikt auf Augenhöhe (SWP-Aktuell 11, Februar, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Williams, T.O., et al., Water Implications of Large-scale Land Acquisitions in Ghana, 5 Water Alternatives, no. 2 (2012).Google Scholar

  • Wolford, W., et al., Governing Global Land Deals: The Role of the State in the Rush for Land, 44 Development and Change, no. 2 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yackee, J., Bilateral Investment Treaties, Credible Commitment, and the Rule of (International) Law: Do BITs Promote Foreign Direct Investment? 42 Law & Society Review, no. 4 (2008).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yackee, J., Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Some Hints from Alternative Sources of Evidence, 51 Virginia Journal of International Law, no. 2 (2010).Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-07-26

Published in Print: 2014-12-01

Citation Information: Law and Development Review, Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 433–471, ISSN (Online) 1943-3867, ISSN (Print) 2194-6523, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2014-0013.

Export Citation

©2014 Law and Development Review.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Michael Brüntrup, Fabian Schwarz, Thomas Absmayr, Jonas Dylla, Franziska Eckhard, Kerstin Remke, and Konrad Sternisko
Food Security, 2018
Emmanuel Opoku Marfo, Kwame Oduro Amoako, Henry Asanti Antwi, Benjamin Ghansah, and Gausu Mohammed Baba
International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 2017, Volume 33, Page 194
Anna Mohr, Tina Beuchelt, Rafaël Schneider, and Detlef Virchow
Biomass and Bioenergy, 2016, Volume 89, Page 133
Yorck Diergarten and Tim Krieger
Law and Development Review, 2015, Volume 8, Number 1
Andreas Neef and Jane Singer
Development in Practice, 2015, Volume 25, Number 5, Page 601

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in