Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Law and Development Review

Editor-in-Chief: Lee, Y.S.


Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.116

Online
ISSN
1943-3867
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Revising the Role of Contract in Development Cooperation

Elizabeth Crawford Spencer
Published Online: 2015-04-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2015-0001

Abstract

Given the ongoing controversy over official development assistance (ODA) and the reduction to Australia’s commitment to aid funding, it is important that Australia’s ODA is effective and is perceived to be so. Among the diverse objectives identified by AusAID’s Office of Development Effectiveness Independent Review of Aid Effectiveness is the need to build local capacity. “Capacity building” is one of the Paris Declaration’s development assistance effectiveness principles, and several of the 2013 DAC Recommendations for AusAID refer to capacity building. Australia works with private contractors, governments of partner countries, civil society organizations and multilateral agencies. Partnering with multilateral organizations represents over 30% of Australia’s development assistance budget, and the DAC Report recommends further increases in partnering for sustainable capacity development. Because small, localized nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) can be flexible, sensitive to local needs, offer grassroots networks, potential specialization, and the ability to assist directly, a strong focus on local NGOs (LNGOs) is recommended to sustainably achieve the aim of capacity building. As is characteristic of the development assistance channel, LNGOs do not work in isolation; their work often involves partnering and cooperation. At a time of increasing multilateral aid and partnering, this study looks at issues of concern to LNGOs through the lens of contracting. Contract and the contracting process can provide critical, though sometimes overlooked, levers of control in the development assistance. The politics of contract law, however, assumes supportive infrastructures of both the government and the market. The utility of contract may take on different dimensions where the legal infrastructure for enforcement is limited and the cultural infrastructure for interpretation requires a pluralistic approach. By framing development assistance effectiveness as a contractual matter, this research adduces relevant threads of contract and organizational theory in its empirical analysis of contracting in development assistance. Semistructured interviews conducted with international and local NGOs and AusAID officials in Southeast Asia shed light on how LNGOs understand the contracting process, how they view contracts and agreements in partnering, what they perceive to be the important issues, and how contracts function. Local context matters nevertheless, this study suggests several common themes with interesting parallels to those in commercial contracting, including issues of control, information, allocation of risk and balance of power. From a theoretical perspective, controversy over the significance and meaning of contract has been part of the academic discourse for decades. This study contributes to better understanding of the role of contract in the development assistance context. Its implications extend to contract theory generally applicable in both commercial and noncommercial realms. From a practical perspective, this study suggests ways contract can better serve the aim of capacity building, and it informs the design of contracting processes better tailored to the actual objectives of contracting parties.

Keywords: development; aid; contract

References

  • Agrawal, D. and R. Lal, Contractual Arrangements in Franchising: An Empirical Investigation, 32 Journal of Marketing Research, no. 2 (1995).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aid Effectiveness 2005-10: Progress in Implementing the Paris Declaration (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2011), available at: <http://www.oecd.org/dac/aid-architecture/DCD_DAC(2012)33_FINAL.pdf>.

  • Aid to Poor Countries Slips Further as Governments Tighten Budgets (2013), available at: <http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/aidtopoorcountriesslipsfurtherasgovernmentstightenbudgets.htm>, accessed 5 November 2013.

  • Atwood J.B., Creating a Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, paper prepared for the University of Minnesota’s Center for Integrative Leadership Conference on creating public value in a multi-sector, shared-power world (Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2012).Google Scholar

  • AusAID’s Private Sector Development Strategy was released at a forum with business in August 2012. OECD DAC PEER REVIEW OF AUSTRALIA, 2013, Memorandum Submitted to the OECD DAC by the Australian Agency for International Development Executive Summary.Google Scholar

  • Australia’s Aid Program, available at: <http://www.ausaid.gov.au/makediff/ode/bilateral-partnerships/Pages/home.aspx>, accessed 10 December 2012.

  • Baer, W. and P. Cook (eds.), The Regulation of Development and the Development of Regulation, 45 The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, no. 2–3 (2005).Google Scholar

  • Bauer, P.T., Dissent on Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

  • Bercovitz, J., An Analysis of the Contract Provisions in Business Format Franchise Agreements (International Society for New Institutional Economics, 2000), available at: <http://www.isnie.org/ISNIE00/Papers/Bercovitz.pdf>, accessed 15 December 2009.

  • Black, J., Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Poly centric Regulatory Regimes, 2 Regulation and Governance, no. 137 (2008).Google Scholar

  • Brakman Reiser, D. and C. Kelly, Linking NGO Accountability and the Legitimacy of Global Governance, 36 Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2011). Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 240, available at SSRN: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1883701>.

  • Brickley, J.A., Incentive Conflicts and Contractual Restraints: Evidence from Franchising, 42 Journal of Law and Economics (1999).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bridging the Gap between Donor Community and Local Organizations in Myanmar, prepared for the Local Resource Centre (LRC), Yangon, available at: <http://lrcmyanmar.org/en/resources/bridging-gap-between-donor-community-and-local-organizations-myanmar>, accessed 10 May 2013.

  • Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (2011): Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, Busan, Republic of Korea, 29 November–1 December 2011, available at: <http://www.dev-practitioners.eu/fileadmin/Redaktion/Documents/Post-Busan_03_2012/Busan_FINAL_EN.pdf?PHPSESSID=676429f1ff11085f8399f01af656fbbc>, accessed 27 March 2013, <busanhlf4/images/stories/hlf4/20110511/Call_to_Action.pdf>, accessed 14 March 2013.

  • Choi, Y., C. Cho, D. Wright and J. Brudney, Dimensions of Contracting for Service Delivery by American States Administrative Agencies: Exploring Linkages between Intergovernmental Relations and Intersectoral Administration, 29 Public Performance and Management Review, no. 1 (2005).Google Scholar

  • Civil Society Engagement Framework: Working with Civil Society Organisations to Help People Overcome Poverty (2012), available at: <http://www.addc.org.au/content/resources/ausaid-civil-society-engagement-framework/983/>, accessed 10 May 2013.

  • Collins, H., “Regulating Contract Law,” in C. Parker (ed.), Regulating Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

  • Collins, H., Regulating Contracts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

  • DeHoog, R. and L. Salamon, “Purchase-of-Service Contracting,” in L. Salamon (eds.), The Tools of Government (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

  • Easterly, W. and C.R. Williamson, Rhetoric versus Reality: The Best and Worst of Aid Agency Practices (2010), available at: <http://dri.fas.nyu.edu/docs/IO/19960/Rhetoricvsreality.pdf or http://williameasterly.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/61_easterly_williamson_rhetoricvsreality_prp.pdf>.

  • Easterly, W., The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done so Much Ill and so Little Good (New York, NY: Penguin, 2006).Google Scholar

  • Eyben, R., Hiding Relations: The Irony of ‘Effective Aid, 22 European Journal of Development Research, no. 3 (2010), available at: <http://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/2028>, pp 382–397.Crossref

  • Farr, G., Contracts as Organizations, 51 Arizona Law Review (2009).Google Scholar

  • Faust, J. and D. Messner, Organizational Challenges for an Effective Aid Architecture – Traditional Deficits, the Paris Agenda and Beyond (Bonn: DIE Discussion Paper 20, 2007).Google Scholar

  • Garton, J., The Regulation of Organized Civil Society (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar

  • Gibson, C.C., The Samaritan’s Dilemma: The Political Economy of Development Aid (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

  • Gifford, G.L., ACFRE President, Cause and Effect (2013), available at: <http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6825.html>, accessed 1 December 2013.

  • Gilson, R.J, C.F. Sabel and R.E. Scott, Contracting for Innovation: Vertical Disintegration and Interfirm Collaboration, 109 Columbia Law Review, no. 431 (2009).Google Scholar

  • Glaser, B. and A. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967).Google Scholar

  • Greenhill, R., The Age of Choice: Cambodia in the New Aid Landscape (London: Overseas Development Institute, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Grizzle, G., Performance Measurement and Dysfunction: The Dark Side of Quantifying Work, 25 Public Performance and Management Review, no. 4 (2002).Google Scholar

  • Guskey, T.R., Does It Make a Difference? Evaluating Professional Development, 59 Educational Leadership (2002).Google Scholar

  • Hadfield, G.K. and I. Bozovic, Scaffolding: Using Formal Contracts to Build Informal Relations to Support Innovation, The USC Law and Economics Research Papers Series No. C12-3 (2013), available at: <http://works.bepress.com/ghadfield/48>.

  • Independent Review of Aid Effectiveness (2011), available at: <http://www.aidreview.gov.au/publications/aidreview.pdf>, accessed 15 November 2012.

  • Is It ODA? Fact Sheet, available at: <http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/34086975.pdf>, accessed 1 December 2014.

  • Keijzer, N., Who’s the Boss? Strengthening the Effectiveness of Capacity-Development Support (Bonn: DIE Briefing Paper 15, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Kerlin, J., Defining Social Enterprise across Different Contexts: A Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors, 42 Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, no. 1 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kreitner, R., Symposium: Contract as Promise at 30: The Future of Contract Theory: On the New Pluralism in Contract Theory, 45 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 915 (2012).Google Scholar

  • Kreitner, R., On the New Pluralism in Contract Theory, 45 Suffolk University Law Review, no. 91 (2012).Google Scholar

  • Lafontaine, F. and K.L. Shaw, The Dynamics of Franchise Contracting: Evidence From Panel Data, 107 Journal of Political Economy, no. 1041 (1999).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lafontaine, F. and M.E. Slade, “Incentive Contracting and the Franchise Decision,” Ch 5 in K. Chatterjee and W.F. Samuelson (eds.), Game Theory and Business Applications (New York, Springer US, 2001).Google Scholar

  • Lewis, J., What Counts Is What Is Counted: Performance Measurement and Its Consequences, Australia and New Zealand School of Government and the State Services Authority of Victoria Occasional Papers (2012), available at: <http://www.anzsog.edu.au/media/upload/publication/98_Jenny-Lewis-WEB-RS.pdf>, accessed 1 December 2013.

  • Lincoln, Y.S. and E.G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry (1st ed., Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1985).Google Scholar

  • Lomfeld, B. and D. Wielsch, The Public Dimension of Contract, 76 Law and Contemporary Problems (2013). Foreword citing Henry S. Maine, Ancient Law 170 (15th ed., 1894) (1861).Google Scholar

  • Lumineau, F. and D. Malhotra, Shadow of the Contract: How Contract Structure Shapes Inter-Firm Dispute Resolution, 32 Strategic Management Journal, no. 5 (2011).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lumineau, F., M. Frechet and D. Puthod, An Organizational Learning Perspective on Contract Design, 9 Strategic Organization, no. 1 (2011), available at: <http://works.bepress.com/fabrice_lumineau/4>.Crossref

  • Malhotra, D. and F. Lumineau, Trust and Collaboration in the Aftermath of Conflict: The Effects of Contract Structure, 54 Academy of Management Journal, no. 5 (2011).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martens, B., Why Do Aid Agencies Exist?, 23 Development Policy Review (2005). doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martens, B., U. Mummert, P. Murrell, P. Seabright and E. Ostrom, The Institutional Economics of Foreign Aid (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

  • Mathewson, G.F. and R.A. Winter, Territorial Restrictions in Franchise Contracts, 32 Economic Inquiry, no. 2 (1994).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maykut, P. and R. Morehouse, Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar

  • Miller, M.R., Contract Law, Party Sophistication and the New Formalism, 75 Missouri Law Review (2010), available at: <http://law.missouri.edu/lawreview/files/2012/11/Miller.pdf>.

  • Morris, M. and J. Pryke, Beyond Paris: 11 Innovations in Aid Effectiveness (Canberra: Australia National University Development Policy Centre, Discussion Papers, 2011).Google Scholar

  • D. Moyo, Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa (London, UK: Penguin, 2009).Google Scholar

  • OECD DAC Peer Review of Australia, 2013 Memorandum, Submitted to the OECD DAC by the Agency for International Development (AusAID), available at: <http://aid.dfat.gov.au/partner/Documents/dac-memorandum.pdf>.

  • Partnerships for Sustainable Development in Cambodia, available at: <http://www.ccc-cambodia.org/>, accessed 5 April 2014.

  • Salamon, L., S.W. Sokolowski and H.K. Anheier, Social Origins of Civil Society: An Overview (Working Paper of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, No. 38., Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, 2000).Google Scholar

  • Sidoti, M. et al., A Question of Balance: Principles, Contracts, and the Government-Not-for-Profit Relationship (Sydney Public Interest Advocacy Center, University of Western Sydney, 2009).Google Scholar

  • Spencer, E., The Regulation of Franchising in the New Global Economy (Northampton, MA: Elgar, 2010).Google Scholar

  • Sumner, A. and R. Mallett, The Future of Foreign Aid: Development Cooperation and the New Geography of Global Poverty (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Teubner, G., Networks as Connected Contracts (London: Bloomsbury, 2011).Google Scholar

  • The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, article 3, 14, no.2, (2009).Google Scholar

  • The Irrawaddy, available at: <http://www.irrawaddy.org/archives/11784>, accessed 20 November 2014.

  • Trubek, D.M., Developmental States and the Legal Order: Towards a New Political Economy of Development and Law (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 2010), available at: <https://media.law.wisc.edu/m/tyyyz/developmental_states_legal_order_2010_trubek.pdf>.

  • Wathne, C. and E. Hedger, What Does an Effective Multilateral Donor Look Like? (London: Overseas Development Institute, 2010).Google Scholar

  • Watson, S. and G. Gunasekara, Regulating Business Format Franchising: Familiar Solutions for Novel Problems, 12 NZBLQ 174 (2006).Google Scholar

  • Zumbansen, P., Transnational Private Regulatory Governance: Ambiguities of Public Authority and Private Power, 76 Law and Contemporary Problems, no. 2 (2013).Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-04-01

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Law and Development Review, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 147–186, ISSN (Online) 1943-3867, ISSN (Print) 2194-6523, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2015-0001.

Export Citation

©2015 Law and Development Review.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in