Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Law and Development Review

Editor-in-Chief: Lee, Y.S.

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Procedural Delay in the Developing Middle East

Kim Economides
  • Corresponding author
  • Professor of Law, Dean, Flinders Law, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-01-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2017-0044


In this article, I explore whether and how Middle Eastern legal process can be reconciled with the idea of timeliness. The idea that any procedure physically within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Middle East and North Africa (MENA) regions could be both fair and expeditious may appear counterintuitive to those brought up in the Anglo-American legal tradition, and the suggestion that there could exist a notion of “timely Middle Eastern procedure” that produced just and fair results is more than likely to be treated as an oxymoron. Administrative, political and legal processes throughout the Levant and Arab world are, when viewed through Western eyes, more than likely to be characterised as corrupt, slow or even Kafkaesque. I argue that procedural delay is an inherently problematic and relative concept, both legally and culturally speaking, which cannot make sense without introducing robust time standards against which court processing time can be evaluated. I seek to elucidate the fundamental nature and causes of procedural delay in relation to civil trials and propose the adoption of a distinct methodology that could be used to more objectively assess court efficiency in handling civil cases throughout the GCC and MENA regions.

Keywords: Law and Development in Middle East; Procedural Delay; Middle Eastern legal process


  • Abdullah AbdulRahman Al Janahi Al Khatib, Legal Regulation for Case Management Office & Its Role in Reducing: Slow Litigation Settlement Problem, paper given at UAE University (UAE, 26–27 September 2016).Google Scholar

  • Acorn, A. and J. Buttuls, The Not Now Habit: Procrastination, Legal Ethics and Legal Education, 16 Legal Ethics (2013).Google Scholar

  • Aldashev, G., Legal Institutions, Political Economy, and Development, 25 Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2009).Google Scholar

  • Aljifri, K., Annual Report Disclosure in a Developing Country: The Case of the UAE, 24 Advances in Accounting, no. 1 (2008).Google Scholar

  • Al-Muhairi, B.S.B.A., The Development of the UAE Legal System and Unification with the Judicial System, 11 Arab Law Quarterly (1996).Google Scholar

  • Annual Report 2014 (Dubai Courts. UAE. 2014)Google Scholar

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics, available at:<http://www.abs.gov.au>

  • Australian Centre for Justice Innovation, The Timeliness Project: Background Report (Melbourne: ACJI, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Beenstock, M., The Productivity of Judges in the Courts of Israel, 35 Israel Law Review (2001).Google Scholar

  • Beenstock, M. and Y. Haitovsky, Does the Appointment of Judges Increase the Output of the Judiciary?, 24 International Review of Law and Economics (2004).Google Scholar

  • Benton, L., Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

  • Blacksell, M., K. Economides and C. Watkins, Justice Outside the City: Access to Legal Services in Rural Britain (Harlow: Longman, 1991).Google Scholar

  • Boyum, K.O., A Perspective on Civil Delay in Trial Courts, 5 Justice System Journal (1979-1980).Google Scholar

  • Bureau of Economic Analysis (US), available at:<http://www.bea.gov>

  • Cain, M. and K. Kulcsar (eds.), Disputes and the Law (Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1983).Google Scholar

  • Calvez, F., Length of Court Proceedings in the Member States of the Council of Europe based on the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg: European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, 2006).Google Scholar

  • Cappelletti, M., Procédure Orale et Procédure Ècrite. Oral and Written Procedure in Civil Litigation (Dobbs Ferry New York: Giuffre, 1971).Google Scholar

  • Cappelletti, M. (ed.), Access to Justice and the Welfare State (Florence: Alphen aan den Rijn Giuffrè: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1981).Google Scholar

  • Cappelletti, M. and B. Garth (eds.), Access to Justice (Milan: Giuffrè Editore/Alphen aan den Rijn, Sijthoff/Noordhoff, 1978).Google Scholar

  • Carballo, A., The Law of the Dubai International Financial Centre: Common Law Oasis or Mirage Within the UAE?, 21 Arab Law Quarterly (2007).Google Scholar

  • Chan, J. and L. Barnes, The Price of Justice? Lengthy Criminal Trials in Australia (Sydney: Hawkins Press, 1995).Google Scholar

  • Church, T. et al., Justice Delayed – The Pace of Litigation in Urban Trial Courts (Virginia: National Center for State Courts, 1978).Google Scholar

  • Committee of Ministers, Resolution Concerning the Judgments of the Court of the European Court of Human Rights of 19 February 1991 and 10 February 1993 in the Case of Zanghi against Italy, Res DH(95) 82 (Council of Europe, Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies, 6–7 June 1995)Google Scholar

  • Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department, Draft Objectives for the Civil Justice System (Canberra, 2012), available at<https://www.ag.gov.au/LegalSystem/Pages/Anevidencebasefortheciviljusticesystem.aspx>

  • Corns, C., Anatomy of Long Criminal Trials (Melbourne: Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, 1997).Google Scholar

  • Damaska, M.R., The Faces of Justice and State Authority. A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

  • Darbyshire, P., Sitting in Judgment: The Working Lives of Judges (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar

  • Dezalay, Y. and B.G. Garth, Dealing in Virtue. International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar

  • Dubai Courts Strategic Plan 2016–2019 (Dubai: Dubai Courts. UAE, 2016).Google Scholar

  • Economides, K., Small Claims and Procedural Justice, 7 British Journal of Law and Society (1980).Google Scholar

  • Economides, K., Mauro Cappelletti’s Legacy: Retrospect and Prospect (Naples: Annuario di Diritto Comparato, 2016).Google Scholar

  • Economides, K., A.A. Haug and J. McIntyre, Toward Timeliness in Civil Justice, 41 Monash University Law Review, no. 2 (2015).Google Scholar

  • Eurostat, available at:<http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat>

  • Ferguson, R.B., The Adjudication of Commercial Disputes, 7 British Journal of Law and Society, no. 2 (1980).Google Scholar

  • Galanter, M., Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, 9 Law & Society Review (1974).Google Scholar

  • Garner, J., Delay Reduction in the Federal Courts: Rule 50(b) and the Federal Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 3 Journal of Quantitative Criminology (1987).Google Scholar

  • Garth, B.G., Observations on an Uncomfortable Relationship: Civil Procedure and Empirical Research, 49 Alabama Law Review (1997).Google Scholar

  • Globerman, S. and D. Shapiro, Governance Infrastructure and U.S. Foreign Direct Investment, 34 Journal of International Business Studies, no. 34 (2003).Google Scholar

  • Goerdt, J.A., Divorce Courts: Case Management, Case Characteristics, and the Pace of Litigation in 16 Urban Jurisdictions (Williamsburg: National Centre for State Courts, 1992).Google Scholar

  • Grossman, J.B. et al., Measuring the Pace of Civil Litigation, 65 Judicature, no. 2 (1981).Google Scholar

  • Hazell, R. and J. Melton (eds.), Magna Carta and Its Modern Legacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

  • Heise, M., Justice Delayed? An Empirical Analysis of Civil Case Disposition Time, 50 Case Western Law Review (1999–2000).Google Scholar

  • Hodrick, R.J. and E.C. Prescott, Postwar US Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation, 29 Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (1997).Google Scholar

  • Hunt, A., The Sociological Movement in Law (London: Macmillan, 1978).Google Scholar

  • ILO, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, available at:<http://www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/research-and-databases/kilm/lang–en/index.htm>

  • International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics, available at:<http://data.imf.org/?sk=5dabaff2-c5ad-4d27-a175-1253419c02d1>

  • Jennings, R.C., Kadi, Court, and Legal Procedure in 17th C. Ottoman Kayseri: The Kadi and the Legal System, 48 Studia Islamica (1978).Google Scholar

  • Khalid Rashid, S., Pecularities and Religious Underlining of ADR in Islamic Law, paper given at Asia Pacific Mediation Forum (Kuala Lumpur, 16–18 June 2008)Google Scholar

  • Klick, J., The Perils of Empirical Work on Institutions, 166 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (2010).Google Scholar

  • Kobeissi, N., Impact of Governance, Legal System and Economic Freedom on Foreign Investment in the MENA Region, 8 Journal of Comparative International Management, no. 1 (2005).Google Scholar

  • Lee, Y.S., Call for a New Analytical Model for Law and Development, 88 Law and Development Review, no. 1 (2015).Google Scholar

  • Liebesny, H.J., Comparative Legal History: Its Role in the Analysis of Islamic and Modern Near Eastern Legal Institutions, 20 American Journal of Comparative Law, no. 1 Winter (1972).Google Scholar

  • Luskin, R.C., Case Processing Times in Three Courts, 9 Law and Policy (1987).Google Scholar

  • Marfording, A. and A. Eyland, Civil Litigation in New South Wales: Empirical and Analytical Comparisons with Germany (Research Paper no. 2010-28, University of New South Wales, 2010)Google Scholar

  • Martin, W., Timeliness in the Justice System: Because Delay is a Kind of Denial, paper no. 16 given at the Australian Centre for Justice Innovation, Monash University conference on Timeliness in the Justice System: Ideas and Innovations (Melbourne, 2014), available at:<http://www.civiljustice.info/timeliness/16>

  • Merryman, J.H., Comparative Law and Social Change: On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, 25 American Journal of Comparative Law (1977).Google Scholar

  • Messick, R.E., Judicial Reform and Economic Development: A Survey of the Issues, 14 World Bank Research Observer (1999).Google Scholar

  • Miller, R.A., Apostates and Bandits: Religious and Secular Interaction in the Administration of Late Ottoman Criminal Law, 97 Studia Islamica (2003).Google Scholar

  • Mylward v Weldon (1596) 21 ER 136.

  • Office of National Statistics (UK), available at:<http://www.ons.gov.uk>

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD.Stat, available at:<http://stats.oecd.org>

  • Palumbo, G. et al., Judicial Performance and its Determinants: A Cross-Country Perspective (OECD Economic Policy Papers no. 5, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Paterson, A., Final Judgment: The Last Law Lords and the Supreme Court (Oxford: Hart, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Pound, R., The Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice, 29 Annual Report of the American Bar Association (1906).Google Scholar

  • Re L (A Child) [2015] EWFC 15.

  • Reif, L.C., The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System (Leiden: Springer, 2004).Google Scholar

  • Rheinstein, M. (ed.), Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society (New York: Simon and Shuster, 1954).Google Scholar

  • Sipes, D. and M. Oram, On Trial: The Length of Civil and Criminal Trials (Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts, 1988).Google Scholar

  • Statistics Canada, available at:<http://www.statcan.gc.ca>

  • Stats NZ, available at:<http://www.stats.govt.nz>

  • Steelman, D.C., What Have We Learned About Court Delay, “Local Legal Culture,” and Caseflow Management Since the Late 1970s?, 19 Justice System Journal (1997).Google Scholar

  • Stewart, M., T. Hunt and M. Forbes, Quake Risk Could Close Public Buildings (New Zealand, 2 December 2011), available at:<http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/6073112/Quake-risk-could-close-public-buildings>

  • Sutton, F. and H. Barwick, Analysing Trends in Jury Trial Length: A Scoping Study (New Zealand: Department for Courts, 2000).Google Scholar

  • Thomas, R.W., B.T. Robson and R.D. Nutter, County Court Workloads: A Location-Allocation Analysis (Working Paper no. 7, University of Manchester: Centre for Urban Policy Studies, School of Geography, 1979).Google Scholar

  • Trubek, D.M., Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism, Wisconsin Law Review (1972).Google Scholar

  • Trubek, M. and M. Galanter, Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflections on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies in the United States, Wisconsin Law Review (1974).Google Scholar

  • Tutton, J., Litigation in the South Australian Fast Track Streams (LLB/LP (Hons) Dissertation, Flinders University, 2016).Google Scholar

  • Twining, W. (ed.), Human Rights, Southern Voices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

  • UK Government, available at:<https://data.gov.uk/>

  • Unger, R.M., Law in Modern Society. Toward a Criticism of Social Theory (New York: Free Press, 1976).Google Scholar

  • United Nations Statistical Commission, Statistics Division, available at:<http://unstats.un.org>

  • United States Census Bureau, available at:<http://www.census.gov>PubMed

  • University of Groningen, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, available at:<http://www.rug.nl/research/ggdc/data/pwt/>

  • World Bank Group, Doing Business 2016, available at:<http://www.doingbusiness.org>

  • Zaneldin, K., Construction Claims in United Arab Emirates: Types, Causes and Frequency, 24 International Journal of Project Management (2006).Google Scholar

  • Zeisel, H., H. Kalven and B. Buchholz, Delay in the Court – An Analysis of the Remedies for Delayed Justice (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1959).Google Scholar

  • Zuckerman, A.A.S. and R. Cranston (eds.), Reform of Civil Procedure: Essays on Access to Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

About the article

This article is based on a paper presented at the 24th Annual Conference of UAE University College of Law, held on 26–27 September 2016 (UAE University, Al-Ain, UAE) on Delay in Judicial Procedures.

Published Online: 2018-01-19

Published in Print: 2018-01-26

Citation Information: Law and Development Review, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 97–125, ISSN (Online) 1943-3867, ISSN (Print) 2194-6523, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2017-0044.

Export Citation

© 2018 Law and Development Review.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in