Abstract
This Article explores how constitutional judges can become agents for development and how they may wish to go about performing this role. Due to the high politico-economic stakes involved and the inevitability of trade-offs between competing interests, judicial review of developmental questions is liable to expose judges to negative fall-outs. At the same time, it is fairly common for Asian constitutions to expressly set out the parameters or objectives for economic development that the State is expected to realize, while simultaneously recognizing a suite of (socio-)economic rights, thereby providing textual ammunition to query the validity of a government’s chosen implementation in court. Against this reality, the Article suggests a range of coping mechanisms that can mitigate risks to judicial legitimacy. At its broadest, the decentralized model of judicial review offers judges opportunities to side-step controversial constitutional questions that are unavailable to the same extent, or at all, to distinct constitutional courts. When deciding on the merits of developmental claims, courts should combine a strong presumption of constitutionality as far as the substance of the law is concerned with robust scrutiny of compliance with procedural guarantees. Additionally, courts should be better equipped with knowledge about the methodologies used by and insights from other social sciences to enable them to better evaluate extra-legal evidence submitted. This will also make it possible to better anticipate the likely economic consequences of particular judicial findings, possibly with a view to tailoring their remedies accordingly.
References
AACC SRD, Jurisdictions and Organization of Association of Asian Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Institutions Members (Seoul, December 31, 2018), available at: <http://www.aaccsrd.org/en/pubsdtl.do>.Search in Google Scholar
Ackerman, B., The New Separation of Powers, 113 Harvard Law Review (2000).10.4324/9781315085302-16Search in Google Scholar
Ahsan, I. and G.R.P. Bueta, Proceedings of the Third South Asia Judicial Roundtable on Environmental Justice for Sustainable Green Development (Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Alston, L., T. Eggersson, and D. North, Empirical Studies in Institutional Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).10.1017/CBO9781139174633Search in Google Scholar
Asia Pacific Judicial Colloquium on Climate Change, Using Constitutions to Advance Environmental Rights and Achieve Climate Justice – Meeting Reports and Materials (Lahore, November 23, 2018), available at: <https://www.ajne.org/resource/asia-pacific-judicial-colloquium-climate-change-using-constitutions-advance-environmental>.Search in Google Scholar
Bastmeijer, C.J. and T. Koivurova (eds.), Theory and Practice of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).10.1163/ej.9789004164796.i-400Search in Google Scholar
Bekhechi, M.A. and J-R. Merder, The Legal and Regulatory Framework for Environmental Impact Assessments – A Study of Selected Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (Washington: The World Bank, 2002).10.1596/0-8213-5115-XSearch in Google Scholar
Bhatia, G., “Directive Principles of State Policy,” in S. Choudhry, M. Khosla, and P. Bhanu Mehta (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).10.1093/law/9780198704898.003.0036Search in Google Scholar
Bui, N.S., The Discourse of Constitutional Review in Vietnam, 9 Journal of Comparative Law (2014).Search in Google Scholar
Butt, S., Traditional Land Rights before the Indonesian Constitutional Court, 10 Law, Environment and Developmental Journal, no. 1 (2014).Search in Google Scholar
Butt, S., “Conditional Constitutionality and Conditional Unconstitutionality in Indonesia,” in P.J. Yap (ed.), Constitutional Remedies in Asia (Abingdon: Routledge, 2019).10.4324/9780429435485-6Search in Google Scholar
Butt, S. and T. Lindsey, Economic Reform When the Constitution Matters: Indonesia’s Constitutional Court and Article 33 of the Constitution, Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09/29, (2009).10.1080/00074910802169004Search in Google Scholar
“Cases of Agrarian Conflict Increase in 2017: Consortium,” The Jakarta Post, December 28, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Chang, W.C. et al., Constitutionalism in Asia – Cases and Materials (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Chen, A. and M.P. Maduro, “The Judiciary and Constitutional Review,” in M. Tushnet, T. Fleiner, and C. Saunders (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013).Search in Google Scholar
Chen, P.L. and J.T. Wada, Can the Japanese Supreme Court Overcome the Political Question Hurdle?, 26 Washington International Law Journal, no. 2 (2017).Search in Google Scholar
Craik, N., The International Law of Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Substance and Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).10.1017/CBO9780511494611Search in Google Scholar
Croissant, A., “Ways of Constitution-Making in Southeast Asia: Actors, Interests, Dynamics,” in M. Bünte and B. Dressel (eds.), Politics and Constitutions in Southeast Asia (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Crouch, M., Dictators, Democrats, and Constitutional Dialogue: Myanmar’s Constitutional Tribunal, 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law, no. 2 (2018).10.1093/icon/moy056Search in Google Scholar
Daly, T.G., A Constitutional Court for Sri Lanka? Perceptions, Potential & Pitfalls, CTN Policy Paper, No. 1 (2017).Search in Google Scholar
De Visser, M., Constitutional Review in Europe – A Comparative Analysis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
De Visser, M., We All Stand Together: The Role of the AACC in Promoting Constitutionalism, 3 Asian Journal of Law and Society, no. 1 (2016).Search in Google Scholar
De Visser, M. and N.S. Bui, Glocalized Constitution-Making in the Twenty-First Century: Evidence from Asia, 8 Global Constitutionalism (2019), 297–331.10.1017/S2045381719000066Search in Google Scholar
Deighton-Smith, R., A. Erbacci, and C. Kauffmann, Promoting Inclusive Growth through Better Regulation: The Role of Regulatory Impact Assessment (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Development Bank, Potential Growth, Misallocation, and Institutional Obstacles: Firm-Level Evidence, ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 480 (Manila, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, R. and E. Posner, The Limits of Constitutional Convergence, 11 Chicago Journal of International Law, no. 2 (2010).10.2139/ssrn.1677634Search in Google Scholar
Dressel, B. and M. Bünte, “Contesting Constitutionalism: Constitutional Politics in Southeast Asia,” in M. Bünte and B. Dressel (eds.), Politics and Constitutions in Southeast Asia (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Farber, D., Rights as Signals, 31 Journal of Legal Studies (2002).10.1086/323889Search in Google Scholar
Ferreres Comella, V., Constitutional Courts & Democratic Values – A European Perspective (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009).10.12987/yale/9780300148671.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fish, E.S., Choosing Constitutional Remedies, 63 UCLA Law Review (2016).10.2139/ssrn.2579113Search in Google Scholar
Formichi, C. (ed.), Religious Pluralism, State and Society in Asia (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013).10.4324/9781315887562Search in Google Scholar
Fuller, L., The Forms and Limits of Adjudication, 92 Harvard Law Review (1978).10.2307/1340368Search in Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S., Are Strong Constitutional Courts Always a Good Thing for New Democracies?, 53 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2015).Search in Google Scholar
Garlicki, L., Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts, 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law, no. 1 (2007).10.1093/icon/mol044Search in Google Scholar
Gautam, K. and A. Bharadwaj, “Justice Cannot Be Blind to the Economy,” The Hindu Business Times, March 27, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T., Judicial Review in New Democracies – Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).10.1017/CBO9780511511189Search in Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. and T. Moustafa (eds.), Rule by Law – The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).10.1017/CBO9780511814822Search in Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. and M. Versteeg, Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?, 30 The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (2014).10.1093/jleo/ewt008Search in Google Scholar
Haggard, S., A. MacIntyre, and L. Tiede, The Rule of Law and Economic Development, 11 Annual Review of Political Science (2008).10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.100244Search in Google Scholar
Halberstam, D., “Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States,” in J. Dunoff and J. Trachtman (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Search in Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., “Federalist: No. 78,” in G. Carey and J. McClellan (eds.), The Federalist, Edited with an Introduction, Reader’s Guide, Constitutional Cross-Reference, Index, and Glossary (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001).Search in Google Scholar
Hand, K., Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China, 7 University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review (2011).Search in Google Scholar
Harding, A., “Asian Law, Public Law, Comparative Law Stir Fry: Theory and Methods Considered,” in T. Groppi, V. Piergigli, and A. Rinella (eds.), Asian Constitutionalism in Transition: A Comparative Perspective (Rome: Giuffre Editore, 2009).Search in Google Scholar
Harding, A., “The Short but Turbulent History of Myanmar’s Constitutional Tribunal,” in A. Chen and A. Harding (eds.), Constitutional Courts in Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).10.1017/9781108163903Search in Google Scholar
Harding, A. and P. Nicholson (eds.), New Courts in Asia (Hoboken: Taylor & Francis, 2009).10.4324/9780203862841Search in Google Scholar
Hidayat, H. et al., Forests, Law and Customary Rights in Indonesia: Implications of a Decision of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in 2012, 59 Asia Pacific Viewpoint (2018).10.1111/apv.12207Search in Google Scholar
Hill, H. (ed.), The Economic Development of Southeast Asia (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002).Search in Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., Towards Juristocracy – The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Search in Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts, 11 Annual Review of Political Science (2008).10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906Search in Google Scholar
Jakab, A., A. Dyevre, and G. Itzcovich(eds.), Comparative Constitutional Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).10.1017/9781316084281Search in Google Scholar
Jayawickrama, N., Establishing a Constitutional Court: The Impediments Ahead, CPA Working Papers on Constitutional Reform, No. 13 (2017).Search in Google Scholar
Kelsen, H, Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution, 3 Journal of Politics (1942).10.2307/2125770Search in Google Scholar
Law, D., Globalization and the Future of Constitutional Rights, 102 Northwestern University Law Review (2008).Search in Google Scholar
Law, D.S., “Constitutional Inertia and Regime Pluralism in Asia,” in M. Graber, S. Levinson, and M. Tushnet (eds.), Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Lee, H.P. and M. Pittard (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).10.1017/9781316480946Search in Google Scholar
Lin, Y. and T. Ginsburg, Constitutional Interpretation in Lawmaking: China’s Invisible Constitutional Enforcement Mechanism, 63 American Journal of Comparative Law, no. 2 (2015).10.5131/AJCL.2015.0013Search in Google Scholar
Lye, L.F. and W. Hofmeister (eds.), Political Parties, Party Systems and Democratization in East Asia (Singapore: World Scientific, 2011).10.1142/7983Search in Google Scholar
Lynch, K.J., Best Friends? Supreme Court Law Clerks on Effective Amicus Curiae Briefs, 20 Journal of Law & Politics, no. 1 (2004).Search in Google Scholar
Mahlmann, M., The Basic Law at 60 – Human Dignity and the Culture of Republicanism, 11 German Law Journal (2010).10.1017/S207183220001840XSearch in Google Scholar
Mahlmann, M., “Human Dignity and Autonomy in Modern Constitutional Orders,” in M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajó (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0020Search in Google Scholar
Ménard, C. and M.M. Shirley (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2008).10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5Search in Google Scholar
Morgan, B., “Indigenous Land Rights Recognised for Pandumaan-Sipituhuta in Indonesia,” The Understory, January 5, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Mourtada-Sabbah, N. and B.E. Cain (eds.), The Political Question Doctrine and the Supreme Court of the United States (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007).Search in Google Scholar
National Council on Climate Change, 2010, Reported by REDD, available at: <http://theredddesk.org/countries/indonesia>.Search in Google Scholar
Neo, J. and N.S. Bui (eds.), Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019).10.5040/9781509920488.ch-001Search in Google Scholar
North, D. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).10.1017/CBO9780511808678Search in Google Scholar
Perdicoúlis, A., B. Durning, and L. Palframan (eds.), Furthering Environmental Impact Assessment (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).10.4337/9781781953570Search in Google Scholar
Posner, R.A., The Constitution as an Economic Document, 56 George Washington Law Review, no. 1 (1987).Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro, M., Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).Search in Google Scholar
Shihata, I., “Judicial Reform in Developing Countries and the Role of the World Bank,” in F. Tschoften and A. Parra (eds.), The World Bank in a Changing World – Selected Essays (London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995).Search in Google Scholar
Sidel, M., The Constitution of Vietnam – A Contextual Analysis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Search in Google Scholar
Singapore Judicial College, Annual Report 2018 (Singapore), available at: <https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/sjc/sjc_ar2018_31dec_flipbk_lr.pdf>Search in Google Scholar
“South Sumatra Shooting Puts Government in Cross Hairs,” Jakarta Globe, July 30, 2012. United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals – Goal 16, available at: <https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/peace-justice/>, accessed March 4, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Uitz, R. and O. Salát, “Individual Autonomy as a Constitutional Value: Fundamental Assumptions Revisited,” in A. Sajó and R. Uitz (eds.), Constitutional Topography: Values and Constitutions (The Hague: Eleven Publishers, 2010).Search in Google Scholar
Venice Commission, The Composition of Constitutional Courts (CDL-STD(1997)020).Search in Google Scholar
Walden, M., Indonesia’s Land Rights Decision a Major Victory for Indigenous Peoples, available at: <https://asiancorrespondent.com/2017/01/indonesias-land-rights-decision-major-victory-indigenous-peoples/>, accessed March 4, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
World Bank, Justice and Development, available at: <http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/justice-rights-and-public-safety>, accessed March 4, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Yeh, J.R. and W.C. Chang, “A Decade of Changing Constitutionalism in Taiwan: Transitional and Transnational Perspectives,” in A. Chen (ed.), Constitutionalism in Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Zhu, G., Constitutional Review in China: An Unaccomplished Project or a Mirage?, 43 Suffolk University Law Review (2010).Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Law and Development Review