Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Law & Ethics of Human Rights

Editor-in-Chief: Stopler, Gila

Editorial Board: Benvenisti, Eyal / Cohen-Eliya, Moshe / Macedo, Stephen / Rosenblum, Nancy


CiteScore 2018: 0.19

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.118
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.225

Online
ISSN
1938-2545
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2, Issue 1

Issues

Comparative Citizenship: A Restrictive Turn in Europe?

Christian Joppke
Published Online: 2008-01-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1938-2545.1018

In the rapidly growing literature on comparative citizenship, a dominant assumption is that the nationality laws in Western states are converging on liberal norms of equality and inclusiveness. However, especially since the onset of the new millennium and an apparent failure of integrating Muslim immigrants there has been a remarkable counter-trend toward more restrictiveness. This paper reviews the causes and features of restrictiveness in the heartland of previous liberalization, north-west Europe. It is argued that even where it seems to be strongest: with respect to the rules of naturalization, the restrictive trend is embedded within an overall liberal, sometimes even liberalizing framework. The notion of a wholesale “restrictive turn in Europe” therefore has to be rejected.

About the article

Published Online: 2008-01-01


Citation Information: Law & Ethics of Human Rights, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 1–41, ISSN (Online) 1938-2545, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1938-2545.1018.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Kristian Kriegbaum Jensen, Per Mouritsen, Emily Cochran Bech, and Tore Vincents Olsen
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2019, Page 1
[2]
Oxana Shevel
Post-Soviet Affairs, 2012, Volume 28, Number 1, Page 111
[3]
Kristian Kriegbaum Jensen and Per Mouritsen
British Journal of Political Science, 2019, Volume 49, Number 3, Page 837
[5]
Per Mouritsen, K Kriegbaum Jensen, and Stephen J Larin
Ethnicities, 2019, Volume 19, Number 4, Page 595
[6]
Hein de Haas, Katharina Natter, and Simona Vezzoli
International Migration Review, 2018, Volume 52, Number 2, Page 324
[8]
Sammy Smooha
Nations and Nationalism, 2018, Volume 24, Number 2, Page 215
[10]
Claudia Finotelli, MariaCaterina La Barbera, and Gabriel Echeverría
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2017, Page 1
[14]
Hein de Haas, Katharina Natter, and Simona Vezzoli
International Migration Review, 2016
[15]
Rainer Bauböck
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2010, Volume 36, Number 5, Page 847
[16]
Sara Wallace Goodman
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2010, Volume 36, Number 5, Page 753
[17]
Paul May
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2016, Volume 42, Number 8, Page 1334
[18]
Dani Carrillo
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2015, Volume 41, Number 12, Page 1932
[19]
Yasemin Nuhoğlu Soysal
The British Journal of Sociology, 2012, Volume 63, Number 1, Page 1
[20]
Lia Antoniou and Hans E. Andersson
Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2015, Volume 38, Number 10, Page 1707
[23]
Christian Joppke
European Journal of Sociology, 2010, Volume 51, Number 01, Page 9
[24]
Dong-Hoon Seol and John D. Skrentny
International Migration Review, 2009, Volume 43, Number 3, Page 578
[25]
Mireille Paquet
Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2012
[26]
Kathleen S. Yep, Tracy Zhao, Catherine Wang, Samuel Pang, and Pauline Wang
Journal of Ethnic And Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 2014, Volume 23, Number 3-4, Page 271
[27]
Hannes B. Mosler and Luicy Pedroza
Ethnopolitics, 2016, Volume 15, Number 2, Page 187

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in