Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Law & Ethics of Human Rights

Editor-in-Chief: Stopler, Gila

Editorial Board: Benvenisti, Eyal / Cohen-Eliya, Moshe / Macedo, Stephen / Rosenblum, Nancy


CiteScore 2018: 0.19

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.118
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.225

Online
ISSN
1938-2545
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 7, Issue 1

Issues

Taking Universality Seriously: A Functional Approach to Extraterritoriality in International Human Rights Law

Yuval Shany
Published Online: 2013-08-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2013-0004

Abstract

International human rights law (IHRL) has struggled to define a standard for determining the extraterritorial applicability of its norms that would reconcile the ethos of universal entitlement, on the one hand, with the centrality of borders in delineating state powers and responsibilities under international law, on the other hand. The case law of the UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) favors barring states from engaging in conduct outside their borders that would be impermissible if undertaken inside their borders. Still, attempts to demarcate the precise scope of extraterritorial application through allusion to degrees of control over individuals or areas, or by the nature of the obligation itself – have led to unsatisfactory, if not arbitrary results. This article opines a move to functionalism as the basis for extraterritorial applicability – requiring states to protect IHRL in situations they can do so. Under this approach, which takes universality seriously, borders lose much their normative significance. I suggest limiting the functional approach to extraterritorial applicability in accordance with two key notions: (1) the intensity of power relations – factual relations of power entailing direct, significant and foreseeable potential impact – should result in the application of IHRL obligations; or, alternatively, (2) special legal relations – relations of power that put the state in a unique legal position to afford IHRL protection would also justify the imposition of extraterritorial obligations.

Keywords: human rights; borders; universality; extraterritorial; state power; international human rights law

About the article

Published Online: 2013-08-28


Citation Information: The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 47–71, ISSN (Online) 1938-2545, ISSN (Print) 2194-6531, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2013-0004.

Export Citation

©2013 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Daniela Covino and Rosa Malgeri Manzo
RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', 2017, Number 1, Page 27

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in