Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.13

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.128
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.722

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1822-9638
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Iranian foreign policy and discourse of divine justice

Ieva Koreivaitė
  • Ieva Koreivaitė is a PhD candidate at Vilnius University, Institute of International Relations and Political Science.
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-04-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lfpr-2016-0003

Abstract

Iran nuclear negotiations, which resulted in an agreement in Vienna on the 14 July 2015 after signing The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, and its aftermath is one of the key topics of inquiry in recent decade. The density of the debate is primarily emanating from concerns related to the security questions of the Middle East and to the sensitivity of Israeli security situation. Moreover, it arises from the complexity of the whole negotiation process. Such issues like Supreme Leader’s Ali Khamene’i’s fatwa designating sinfulness to the nuclear capacity, his after-deal speech, calling for the enmity between Iran and the United States, Iran’s declared aim to implement global justice and other cases are not customary acts of the state and the study of Iranian foreign policy is not substantive using customary instruments of analysis of International Relations. The article refers to the problem of knowledge production on Iran, and suggests that it mainly resulted from the lack of exchange between International Relations and Middle Eastern studies. This article aims to point at the authority of the ideas in Iran’s foreign policy that Islam or Islamic ideologies like Khumaynism produce. Therefore the article focuses on the main narratives of the First Supreme Leader Ruhullah Khumayni’s concept of justice in order to, first, explain the key points in Iran’s position during negotiations and its aftermath and, second, to introduce the study of the concept of justice as a productive source of information and an approach for further analysis of Iranian foreign policy.

Keywords: Iranian foreign policy; Khumayni; Islam; justice; nuclear negotiations; shi’ite doctrine

About the article

Published Online: 2016-04-22

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, ISSN (Online) 1822-9638, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lfpr-2016-0003.

Export Citation

© 2015 Ieva Koreivaitė, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in