Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Libri

International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Albright, Kendra S. / Bothma, Theo J.D.

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.507

CiteScore 2017: 0.52

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.243
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.634

Online
ISSN
1865-8423
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 56, Issue 1

Issues

The Other Side of the Coin for Open Access Publishing – A Developing Country View

Jennifer Papin-Ramcharan / Richard A Dawe
Published Online: 2007-12-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2006.16

This article presents the Open Access publishing experience of researchers in an academic research institution, in a developing country, Trinidad and Tobago, namely at the University of the West Indies (UWI) St. Augustine Campus. It considers UWI researchers' knowledge of Open Access, their access to the scholarly literature, Open Access Archives/Repositories at UWI and related issues of Research and Library funding and Information Communication Technology (ICT) Infrastructure/Internet connectivity. The article concludes that whilst Open Access publishing yields some obvious and well-documented benefits for developing country researchers, including free access to research articles and increased impact and visibility of “published” Open Access articles, there are some disincentives that militate against developing country researchers fully contributing to the global body of knowledge via Open Access. It finds that Open Access Journals are beneficial for scholars who consume information but are of little benefit for developing country scholars wanting to publish in these journals because of the high cost of page charges. Inadequate and unreliable ICT infrastructure and Internet connectivity also often limit access to information. It concludes that because of technical, financial, human and infrastructural limitations, Open Access via the Green Road of self-archiving is also often not an option for developing country researchers. These researchers are therefore unable to reap the real benefits, of making their research Open Access, that of increased impact and visibility.This study is to develop and evaluate methods and instruments for assessing the usability of digital libraries. It discusses the dimensions of usability, what methods have been applied in evaluating usability of digital libraries, their applicability, and criteria. It is found in the study that there exists an interlocking relationship among effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. It provides operational criteria for effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability. It discovers users' criteria on ”ease of use,” ”organization of information,” ”terminology and labeling,” ”visual attractiveness,” and ”mistake recovery.” Common causes of ”user lostness” were found. ”Click cost” was examined.

About the article

Corresponding author: Jennifer Papin-Ramcharan, Engineering and Physical Sciences Librarian, The Main Library, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus. Tel: 868-662-2002 ext 2244, 3594 Fax: 868-662-9238. E-mail:

Richard A Dawe, Professor, Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus. Tel: 868-662-2002 ext. 2164; Fax: 868-662-4414. E-mail:


Received: 2006-01-09

Accepted: 2006-01-22

Published Online: 2007-12-05

Published in Print: 2006-04-25


Citation Information: Libri, Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 16–27, ISSN (Print) 0024-2667, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2006.16.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Jørgen Burchardt
SAGE Open, 2014, Volume 4, Number 4, Page 215824401455171
[2]
Ingrid Iton and Ardon Iton
IFLA Journal, 2016, Volume 42, Number 1, Page 25
[3]
Mohammad reza Ghane and Mohammad Reza Niazmand
The Electronic Library, 2016, Volume 34, Number 5, Page 740
[4]
Mangkhollen Singson, M. Gnanaselvi Joy, S. Thiyagarajan, and Valerie Dkhar
International Information & Library Review, 2015, Volume 47, Number 1-2, Page 1
[5]
Feria Wirba Singeh, A. Abrizah, and Noor Harun Abdul Karim
The Electronic Library, 2013, Volume 31, Number 2, Page 188
[6]
Lu Xiao and Nicole Askin
Online Information Review, 2014, Volume 38, Number 3, Page 332
[7]
[8]
Ian Rowlands
Library & Information Science Research, 2007, Volume 29, Number 3, Page 369
[9]
Jingfeng Xia
Journal of Documentation, 2012, Volume 68, Number 1, Page 72
[10]
Lorri Mon and Lydia Eato Harris
The Reference Librarian, 2011, Volume 52, Number 4, Page 352
[11]
Tove Faber Frandsen
Journal of Documentation, 2009, Volume 65, Number 1, Page 58
[12]
Mike McGrath
Interlending & Document Supply, 2006, Volume 34, Number 4, Page 194

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in