Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Libri

International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Albright, Kendra S. / Bothma, Theo J.D.

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.400
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.507

CiteScore 2016: 0.68

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.390
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.718

Online
ISSN
1865-8423
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 63, Issue 4 (Nov 2013)

Issues

Multidimensional Journal Evaluation of PLOS ONE

Christel Fein
  • Corresponding author
  • Bachelor’s Degree student since October 2010, Institute of Linguistics and Information Science, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-11-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0021

Abstract

PLOS ONE (formerly PLoS ONE) is an international open access online journal published by the Public Library of Science. The periodical covers all science and medicine categories and has published as many as 28,852 documents from 2007 to 2011. PLOS ONE will be used to show the range of journal metrics and informetric methods regarding validity, practicability and informative value. To assess this data as specifically as possible and to address all relevant factors, the evaluation is split into five dimensions, each of which involves distinct metrics. The five dimensions are journal output, journal content, journal perception, journal citations and journal management. Each of them is pointed out in the process of the analyses, and all significant evaluation results are presented. The results show that PLOS ONE has experienced an enormous development. Because of a relatively low rejection rate of 31%, its openness towards a multitude of different research areas, an internationally large peer review community, and its open access, a plurality of documents can be published in comparison with a print-journal or other online periodicals. The results of the evaluation indicate that PLOS ONE should be assessed from numerous perspectives because there are a variety of indicators beyond the impact factor that can be made use of in order to evaluate exhaustively the standing of the journal as well as its prestige and impact.

About the article

Published Online: 2013-11-29

Published in Print: 2013-11-01


Citation Information: Libri, ISSN (Online) 1865-8423, ISSN (Print) 0024-2667, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0021.

Export Citation

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.. This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Simon Wakeling, Peter Willett, Claire Creaser, Jenny Fry, Stephen Pinfield, and Valerie Spezi
Publications, 2017, Volume 5, Number 2, Page 7
[2]
Valerie Spezi, Simon Wakeling, Stephen Pinfield, Claire Creaser, Jenny Fry, and Peter Willett
Journal of Documentation, 2017, Volume 73, Number 2, Page 263
[3]
Simon Wakeling, Peter Willett, Claire Creaser, Jenny Fry, Stephen Pinfield, Valérie Spezi, and Pablo Dorta-González
PLOS ONE, 2016, Volume 11, Number 11, Page e0165359
[4]
Olgica Nedić and Aleksandar Dekanski
Scientometrics, 2016, Volume 107, Number 1, Page 15
[5]
Paul. E. Duckett and Vincenzo Repaci
Marine and Freshwater Research, 2015, Volume 66, Number 8, Page 665
[6]
Jan Oosterhaven
Scientometrics, 2015, Volume 103, Number 1, Page 261

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in