Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


The Journal of Linguaculture Centre for (Inter)cultural and (Inter)lingual Research, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi

2 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Descriptions of the Body: Violence in the Subcultures of Contemporary Romanian Youth

Daniela Doboș
Published Online: 2013-02-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10318-012-0014-6


For a long time, with few exceptions, Romanian linguistics took no interest in native slang, but after 1990 this has made a dramatic comeback in more than one way. One of the crudest versions of new slang, with touches of violence and licentiousness, turning the unsayable into sayable, is that currently used by young Romanians. It has been justly argued that such linguistic outlet came as a logical consequence, after the demise of communism, of the former censorship and wooden tongue. The paper sets out to put this oft-deplored linguistic phenomenon into perspective and analyse the main linguistic means employed in shaping it up.

Keywords: slang; subculture; violence; licentiousness

  • Bernstein, Basil.”Social Class, Language and Socialization”. Ed. Pier Paolo Giglioli. Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972. Print.Google Scholar

  • Besançon, Alain. 1993. Originile intelectuale ale leninismului. Bucureşti: Humanitas. Bowie, M. Lacan. London: Fontana, 1991. Print.Google Scholar

  • Bracher, M. Lacan, Discourse and Social Change: A Psychoanalytic Cultural Criticism. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press, 1993. Print.Google Scholar

  • Brossat, Alain. Le corps de l’ennemi. Hyperviolence et démocratie. Paris: La Fabrique, 1998. Print.Google Scholar

  • Cesereanu, Ruxandra. Imaginarul violent al românilor. Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2003. Print.Google Scholar

  • ----------. Gulagul în conştiinţa românească. Memorialistica şi literatura închisorilor şilagărelor comuniste. Iaşi: Polirom, 2005. Print.Google Scholar

  • ----------.“Cuvântul care ucide”. Năravuri româneşti. Texte de atitudine. Iaşi: Polirom, 2007. 174-180. Print.Google Scholar

  • Chapman, Robert. New Dictionary of American Slang. New York: Harper&Row, 1986. Print.Google Scholar

  • Chelaru-Murăruş, Oana. „Limba română de azi. Fals decalog”. Dilema veche 108, (2006). Print.Google Scholar

  • Cheshire, Jenny. Variation in an English Dialect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Print.Google Scholar

  • Constantinescu-Dobridor, Gh. Mic dicţionar de terminologie lingvistică. Bucureşti: Ed. Albatros, 1980. Print.Google Scholar

  • Crouch, Stanley. “For the future of hip-hop, all that glitters is not gold teeth” 2008. Web. 23 Sept. 2010. Eble, Connie. Slang and Sociability: In-group Language among College Students. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996. Print.Google Scholar

  • Eckert, Penelope. “Why ethnography?” Eds. Ulla-Britt Kotsinas, Anna-Brita Stenstrom and Anna-Malin Karlsson. Ungdomsspråk i Norden. Stockholm MINS. 1997. 52-62. Print.Google Scholar

  • Feldman, Shirley and Doreen A. Rosenthal. “Age expectations of behavioral autonomy in Hong Kong, Australian and American youths: the influence of family variables and adolescent values.” International Journal of Psychology 26 (1991): 1-23. Print.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gheo, Radu Pavel. DEX-ul şi sexul. Iaşi: Polirom, 2005. Print.Google Scholar

  • Goudailler, Jean-Pierre. Comment tu tchatches!. Paris : Maisonneuve & Larose, 1997. Print.Google Scholar

  • Graur, Al. „Între preţios şi vulgar”. Coord. Sorin Stati. Educaţie şi limbaj. Bucureşti: Ed. Didactică şi Pedagogică, 1972, 229-231. Print.Google Scholar

  • Grigurcu, Gh. „Douămiiştii”. România literară nr. 33 (2005). Web. 23 Sept. 2010. Gumperz, John. “The speech community”. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed) Language andSocial Context. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972. Print.Google Scholar

  • Hall, Edward T. Beyond Culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1976. Print.Google Scholar

  • Iacob, Andreea. „Imaginarul violent al muzicii hip-hop din România”. Caietele Echinox 3 (2002): 268-271. Print.Google Scholar

  • Jackson, Howard and Etienne Zé Amvela. Words, Meaning and Vocabulary. London & New York: Cassell, 2000. Print.Google Scholar

  • Legaudaite, Jolanta. “Similarities and differences between slang in Kaunas and London teenagers’ speech”. Eds. Anna-Brita Stenström and Annette Myre Jørgensen. Youngspeak in a MultilingualPerspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2009, 177-202. Print.Google Scholar

  • LePage, R.B. and A. Tabouret-Keller. Acts of Identity: Creole-based approaches tolanguage and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Print.Google Scholar

  • Mark, Desmond. “Jugend, Musik und Medien - Plädoyer für eine unvoreingennomene Diskussion”. Muzikerziehung 50 (1996): 64-70. Print.Google Scholar

  • Mincu, Marin (ed). Generaţia 2000. Constanţa: Pontica, 2004. Print.Google Scholar

  • Murăruş, Oana şi Rodica Zafiu. 2010. „Limba: expresia societăţii?” Dilema veche 314/(2010). Web. 25 Sept. 2010. Partridge, Eric. Usage and Abusage. A Guide to Good English. London: Book Club Associates, 1974. Print.Google Scholar

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de. Cours de linguistique générale. Publié par C. Bailly & A. Séchehaye. Paris: Payot & Rivages, 1916/1995. Print.Google Scholar

  • Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana. „Violenţa în limbaj. Îţi rup mîna şi-ţi dau cu ea în cap”. România literară 17 sept. 2001. Web. 25 Sept. 2010. Stenström, Anna-Brita and Annette Myre Jørgensen, eds. Youngspeak in a MultilingualPerspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2009. Print.Google Scholar

  • Stenström, Anna-Brita, Gisle Andersen and Kristine I. Hasund. Trends in Teenage Talk. Corpus compilation, analysis and findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002. Print.Google Scholar

  • Stoichiţoiu-Ichim, Adriana. Vocabularul limbii române actuale. Dinamică, influenţe,creativitate. Bucureşti: All Educaţional, 2001. Print.Google Scholar

  • Tate, Greg. “15 Arguments in Favor of the Future of Hip-Hop”. Ed. Alan Light. TheVibe History of Hip-Hop. New York: Three Rivers Press, 1999. 385-394. Print.Google Scholar

  • Thornton, Sarah. “The Social Logic of Subcultural Capital”. Eds. Ken Gelder and Sarah Thornton. The Subcultures Reader. London & New York: Routledge. 1995/1997, 200-209. Print.Google Scholar

  • Zafiu, Rodica. Diversitate stilistică în româna actuală. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 2001. Print. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-02-08

Published in Print: 2011-12-01

Citation Information: Linguaculture, Volume 2011, Issue 2, Pages 125–133, ISSN (Online) 2067-9696, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10318-012-0014-6.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in