Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Gast, Volker


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.066

CiteScore 2018: 0.97

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.384
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.409

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 37, Issue 3

Issues

Face vs. empathy: the social foundation of Maithili verb agreement

Balthasar Bickel / Walter Bisang / Yogendra P Yādava
Published Online: 2008-02-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.3.481

Abstract

Maithili features one of the most complex agreement systems of any Indo-Aryan language. Not only nominative and non-nominative subjects, but also objects, other core arguments, and even nonarguments are cross-referenced, allowing for a maximum of three participants encoded by the verb desinences. The categories reflected in the morphology are person, honorific degree, and, in the case of third persons, gender, spatial distance, and focus. However, not all combinations of category choices are equally represented, and there are many cases of neutralization. We demonstrate that the paradigm structure of Maithili verb agreement is not arbitrary but can be predicted by two general principles of interaction in Maithil society: a principle of social hierarchy underlying the evaluation of people's “face” (Brown and Levinson 1987[1978]), and a principle of social solidarity defining degrees of “empathy” (Kuno 1987) to which people identify with others. Maithili verb agreement not only reflects a specific style of social cognition but also constitutes a prime means of maintaining this style by requiring constant attention to its defining parameters. In line with this, we find that the system is partly reduced by uneducated, so-called lower-caste speakers, who are least interested in maintaining this style, especially its emphasis on hierarchy.

About the article

*Correspondence address: Prof. Dr Walter Bisang, Institut für Allgemeine und Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universitaät Mainz, Jakob-Welder-Weg 18, D-55099 Mainz, Germany.


Received: 1998-08-05

Revised: 1999-05-04

Published Online: 2008-02-20

Published in Print: 1999-05-01


Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 481–518, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.3.481.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Sandy F. Ritchie
Studies in Language, 2017, Volume 41, Number 3
[2]
Balthasar Bickel and Martin Gaenszle
Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 2015, Volume 2, Number 1
[3]
Saartje Verbeke and Ludovic De Cuypere
Studies in Language, 2015, Volume 39, Number 1, Page 1
[4]
Chongwon Park
Studies in Language, 2014, Volume 38, Number 4, Page 717
[5]
Abhishek Kumar Kashyap
Journal of Pragmatics, 2012, Volume 44, Number 13, Page 1868
[6]
Balthasar Bickel and Yogendra P. Yādava
Lingua, 2000, Volume 110, Number 5, Page 343
[7]
Matthias Gerner and Walter Bisang
Folia Linguistica Historica, 2009, Volume 43, Number Historica vol. 30
[8]
Orin D. Gensler
Linguistic Typology, 2003, Volume 7, Number 2, Page 187

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in