Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.644
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.878

CiteScore 2017: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.418
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.386

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 43, Issue 1

Issues

A Discourse-Based Account of Spanish ser/estar

Claudia Maienborn
Published Online: 2005-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.1.155

Abstract

The study offers a discourse-based account of the Spanish copula forms ser and estar, which are generally considered to be lexical exponents of the stage-level/individual-level contrast. It argues against the popular view that the distinction between SLPs and ILPs rests on a fundamental cognitive division of the world that is reflected in the grammar. As it happens, conceptual oppositions like “temporary vs. permanent” or “arbitrary vs. essential” provide only a preference for the interpretation of estar and ser. In addition, the evidence for an SLP/ILP impact on the grammar turns out to be far less conclusive than is currently assumed. The study argues against event-based accounts of the ser/estar contrast in particular, showing that ser and estar pattern alike in failing all of the standard eventuality tests. The discourse-based account proposed instead assumes that ser and estar both display the same lexical semantics (which is identical to the semantics of English be, German sein, etc.); estar diers from ser only in presupposing a relation to a specific discourse situation. By using estar a speaker restricts his or her claim to a specific discourse situation, whereas by using ser, the speaker makes no such restriction. The preference for interpreting estar predications as denoting temporary properties and ser predications as denoting permanent properties follows from economy principles driving the pragmatic legitimation of estar's discourse dependence. The analysis proposed in this article can also account for the observation that ser predications do not give rise to thetic judgments. The proposal is couched in terms of the framework of DRT.

About the article

Correspondence address: Department of German Language and Linguistics, Humboldt University Berlin, Schützenstr. 21, 10117 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: .


Received: 26 March 2003

Revised: 26 August 2003

Published Online: 2005-07-27

Published in Print: 2005-01-01


Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 155–180, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.1.155.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Juana M. Liceras, Raquel Fernández Fuertes, and Anahí Alba de la Fuente
First Language, 2012, Volume 32, Number 1-2, Page 88
[2]
Paola E. Dussias, Carla Contemori, and Patricia Román
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2014, Volume 27, Number 1, Page 54
[3]
Pablo E. Requena, Astrid I. Román-Hernández, and Karen Miller
Language Acquisition, 2015, Volume 22, Number 2, Page 193
[5]
Egbert Fortuin
Lingua, 2009, Volume 119, Number 3, Page 517
[6]
Barbara Leone-Fernandez, Nicola Molinaro, Manuel Carreiras, and Horacio A. Barber
Brain and Language, 2012, Volume 120, Number 2, Page 127

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in