Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.897

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.309
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.158

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 43, Issue 3 (May 2005)

Issues

Degrees of clause integration: from endotactic to exotactic subordination in Dutch

Hans Smessaert / Bert Cornillie / Dagmar Divjak / Karel van den Eynde
Published Online: 2005-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.471

Abstract

This article presents a fine-grained syntactic categorization of Dutch subordinating conjunctions, both simple and phrasal. By means of a hierarchical set of formal criteria, this article provides a detailed description of the syntactic behavior of 87 conjunctions with a total of 154 different readings. These formal criteria test the degree of dependence on the main clause predicator. The presence or absence of proportionality with paradigms of proforms is introduced as a fundamental criterion for syntactic analysis (Section 2). This concept is further refined by distinguishing between external and internal proportionality (Section 3). The possibility of clefting the subordinate clause is applied as a syntagmatic criterion (Section 4) and correlated with the proportionality criteria (Section 5). The next step examines the possibility of fronting the subordinate clause (Section 6) and its relation to the various clefting types (Section 7). Finally, the different correlation results are integrated into a hierarchically structured general overview (Section 8). In the epilogue, a first attempt is made at mapping the syntactic categorization elaborated in the body of the article onto the more general (semantic and functional) typologies of clause integration presented in the literature by different authors. This comparison wants to stress the general methodological applicability of the approach presented (Section 9).

About the article

Correspondence address: K. U. Leuven, Department of Linguistics, Blijde-Inkomststraat 21, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: .


Received: 23 July 2002

Revised: 11 September 2003

Published Online: 2005-07-27

Published in Print: 2005-05-20


Citation Information: Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.471.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Gilles Corminboeuf and Christophe Benzitoun
Corela, 2014, Number 12-1
[2]
Jeanne-Marie Debaisieux
Language Sciences, 2016, Volume 58, Page 79
[3]
Dagmar Divjak and Stefan Th Gries
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2006, Volume 2, Number 1
[4]
Clara Vanderschueren and Ludovic De Cuypere
Language Sciences, 2014, Volume 41, Page 153
[5]
Sune Sønderberg Mortensen
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 2011, Volume 43, Number 2, Page 127
[6]
Ingrid Van Canegem-Ardijns and William Van Belle
Journal of Pragmatics, 2008, Volume 40, Number 2, Page 349
[7]
Sara Verbrugge and Hans Smessaert
Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, Volume 43, Number 14, Page 3387
[9]
Dagmar Divjak and Laura A. Janda
Transactions of the Philological Society, 2008, Volume 106, Number 2, Page 138

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in