Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details


An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.763
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.872
Rank 78 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.496
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.099
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.689

See all formats and pricing
Select Volume and Issue


Degrees of clause integration: from endotactic to exotactic subordination in Dutch

Hans Smessaert1 / Bert Cornillie2 / Dagmar Divjak3 / Karel van den Eynde4





Correspondence address: K. U. Leuven, Department of Linguistics, Blijde-Inkomststraat 21, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: .

Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 471–529, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.471, July 2005

Publication History

23 July 2002
11 September 2003
Published Online:


This article presents a fine-grained syntactic categorization of Dutch subordinating conjunctions, both simple and phrasal. By means of a hierarchical set of formal criteria, this article provides a detailed description of the syntactic behavior of 87 conjunctions with a total of 154 different readings. These formal criteria test the degree of dependence on the main clause predicator. The presence or absence of proportionality with paradigms of proforms is introduced as a fundamental criterion for syntactic analysis (Section 2). This concept is further refined by distinguishing between external and internal proportionality (Section 3). The possibility of clefting the subordinate clause is applied as a syntagmatic criterion (Section 4) and correlated with the proportionality criteria (Section 5). The next step examines the possibility of fronting the subordinate clause (Section 6) and its relation to the various clefting types (Section 7). Finally, the different correlation results are integrated into a hierarchically structured general overview (Section 8). In the epilogue, a first attempt is made at mapping the syntactic categorization elaborated in the body of the article onto the more general (semantic and functional) typologies of clause integration presented in the literature by different authors. This comparison wants to stress the general methodological applicability of the approach presented (Section 9).

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Clara Vanderschueren and Ludovic De Cuypere
Language Sciences, 2014, Volume 41, Page 153
Sune Sønderberg Mortensen
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 2011, Volume 43, Number 2, Page 127
Ingrid Van Canegem-Ardijns and William Van Belle
Journal of Pragmatics, 2008, Volume 40, Number 2, Page 349
Sara Verbrugge and Hans Smessaert
Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, Volume 43, Number 14, Page 3387
Dagmar Divjak and Laura A. Janda
Transactions of the Philological Society, 2008, Volume 106, Number 2, Page 138

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.