Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.763
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.872
Rank 78 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.496
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.099
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.689

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
Select Volume and Issue

Issues

Aspects of Vietnamese clausal structure: separating tense from assertion

Nigel Duffield
  • University of Sheffield.
  • :
Published Online: 2007-07-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2007.023

Abstract

This article presents some data from Vietnamese that provide significant empirical support for the theoretical claims articulated in Klein (1998, 2006): first, that finiteness should be understood as a composite of tense and assertion, and that assertion may be realized independently of tense marking; second, that the assertion operator so realized has only partial scope over elements of the clause, so that fronted elements may evade this scopal influence. Vietnamese is of special interest because — as claimed here — it expresses assertion independently of Tense or Aspect: in this regard Vietnamese contrasts with most Indo-European languages, as well as with other isolating East Asian languages. The formal analysis of these data involves two further theoretical claims. The first is that assertion is syntactically projected in a comparatively low functional projection, immediately above vP: this claim is thus opposed to recent proposals that would place these type of functional category higher (on the left periphery of the clause). The second claim developed here is that in Vietnamese the displacement of certain underspecified constituents is explained by their requirement to come within — alternatively, to evade — the scope of this assertion operator. That is, syntactic movement may be driven by considerations other than purely formal feature checking.

*Correspondence address: Dept. of English Language and Linguistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.


Received: 2004-03-16

Revised: 2005-01-31

Published Online: 2007-07-31

Published in Print: 2007-07-20


Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 765–814, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2007.023, July 2007

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Theresa Biberauer and Michelle Sheehan
The Linguistic Review, 2011, Volume 28, Number 4

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.