Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.897

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.309
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.158

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 46, Issue 2 (May 2008)

Issues

The dual theory of reduplication

Sharon Inkelas
Published Online: 2008-03-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.013

Abstract

This article argues that the fundamental typological distinction pertaining to reduplication is that between phonological duplication and morphological doubling (the Dual Theory of reduplication). Phonological duplication, which occurs for a phonological purpose such as providing an onset or nucleus for a syllable or filling in the featural content of an otherwise unspecified timing unit in the representation, is formally related to phonological assimilation, modeled here via the mechanism of string-internal correspondence. It obeys phonological locality conditions, targets phonologically defined constituents, and is sensitive to phonological markedness considerations. Morphological doubling, which occurs for a morphological purpose such as marking a change in meaning or creating a new stem type, is the result of the doubling of a morphological category such as root, stem, or affix. Morphological doubling, modeled via the “double insertion” mechanism of Morphological Doubling Theory (Inkelas and Zoll 2005), is not derived by phonological correspondence and therefore is not subject to any of the phonological properties characteristic of phonological duplication; the two copies, related morphosemantically, are phonologically independent.

About the article

*Correspondence address: Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley, 1203 Dwinelle, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.


Received: 2004-12-02

Revised: 2007-12-09

Published Online: 2008-03-12

Published in Print: 2008-05-01


Citation Information: Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.013.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Francesca Forza
Journal of Universal Language, 2011, Volume 12, Number 2, Page 7
[2]
Iris Berent, Outi Bat-El, and Vered Vaknin- Nusbaum
Cognition, 2017, Volume 161, Page 117
[3]
Iris Berent, Outi Bat-El, Diane Brentari, Amanda Dupuis, and Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016, Volume 113, Number 48, Page 13702
[4]
Studies in Language, 2016, Volume 39, Number 4, Page 992
[6]
Laura J. Downing and Sharon Inkelas
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2015, Volume 9, Number 12, Page 516
[7]
Alexander Clark and Ryo Yoshinaka
Machine Learning, 2014, Volume 96, Number 1-2, Page 5
[8]
Iris Berent, Colin Wilson, Gary F. Marcus, and Douglas K. Bemis
Linguistic Inquiry, 2012, Volume 43, Number 1, Page 97

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in