Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.644
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.878

CiteScore 2017: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.418
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.386

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 46, Issue 5

Issues

Functional relations in the English auxiliary system

Yehuda N. Falk
Published Online: 2008-09-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.028

Abstract

This article addresses the question of the syntactic functional relations between English auxiliaries and the verbal elements that follow them. There are two basic types of analysis: either the auxiliary is the head and the VP is the complement, or the “main verb” is the head and the auxiliary is a feature-bearing modifier. It is argued here that there is no single correct analysis for all English auxiliaries: some (do, have, will/shall, would) are feature-bearers while others are argument-taking predicates.

About the article

Department of English, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel. E-mail: .


Received: 2005-03-02

Revised: 2005-07-21

Published Online: 2008-09-30

Published in Print: 2008-08-01


Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 861–889, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.028.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Bronwen Patricia Dyson
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 2010, Volume 33, Number 3, Page 30.1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in