Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.763
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.872
Rank 78 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.496
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.099
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.689

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
Select Volume and Issue

Issues

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Language learning from the perspective of nonlinear dynamic systems

Annette Hohenberger1 / Annemarie Peltzer-Karpf2

1Middle East Technical University

2University of Graz

Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, İnönü Bulvari, 06531 Ankara, Turkey. E-mail:

Citation Information: Linguistics. Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 481–511, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.017, March 2009

Publication History

Received:
2005-05-10
Revised:
2008-07-03
Published Online:
2009-03-11

Abstract

This article outlines a nonlinear dynamic systems approach to language learning on the basis of developmental cognitive neuroscience. Language learning, on this view, is a process of experience-dependent shaping and selection of broadly defined domain-general and domain-specific genetic predispositions. The central concept of development is (neuro)cognitive growth in terms of self-organization. Linguistic structure-building is synergetic and emergent insofar as the acquisition of a critical mass of elements on a local level (e.g., words) results in the emergence of novel qualities and units on a macroscopic level (e.g., syntax). We argue that language development does not take a linear path but comes in phases of intermittent turbulence, fluctuation, and stability, along a “chaotic itinerary”. We review qualitative, quantitative and computational applications of this concept in the lexical, morphological, and syntactic domain. We identify as the most significant property of the dynamic approach the temporal nature of language learning. As a medium-term forecast we anticipate a further diversification of the dynamic approach, an increase in more formal approaches, and a stronger interest in issues of embodiment and embeddedness.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Marlies de Zeeuw, Robert Schreuder, and Ludo T. W. Verhoeven
Writing Systems Research, 2014, Page 1
[3]
Michael W. Marek and Wen-Chi Vivian Wu
Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2014, Volume 27, Number 6, Page 560
[4]
Annemarie Peltzer-Karpf
Strabismus, 2012, Volume 20, Number 2, Page 69

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.