Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: van der Auwera, Johan

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.897

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.309
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.158

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 48, Issue 3 (Jan 2010)


Pragmatic functions, semantic classes, and lexical categories

William Croft
  • Corresponding author
  • University of New Mexico
Published Online: 2010-06-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.024


Smith offers a critique of the theory of parts of speech in Croft (Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information, University of Chicago Press, 1991, Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective, Oxford University Press, 2001) inter alia. Smith tries to make a functionally-based universal-typological theory of parts of speech provide an answer to the problem of defining word classes and giving those classes the same names across languages (“noun”; “adjective”); this is not possible and not what I intended. Smith conflates semantic properties with pragmatic properties, and he conflates different pragmatic properties that cannot be conflated. There are challenging issues in defining pragmatic functions and their linguistic reflexes, but Smith's critique only briefly touches on them.

About the article

Correspondence address: MSC03 2130, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA. E-mail:

Received: 2009-10-27

Published Online: 2010-06-17

Published in Print: 2010-05-01

Citation Information: Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.024.

Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in