Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Linguistics

An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences

Editor-in-Chief: Gast, Volker


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.066

CiteScore 2018: 0.97

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.384
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.409

Online
ISSN
1613-396X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 49, Issue 2

Issues

A discourse-constructional approach to the emergence of discourse markers in English

Diana M. Lewis
Published Online: 2011-03-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.013

Abstract

This article argues that it is frequency and usage effects, arising in particular contexts and constructions, that lead to the emergence of new semantic and syntactic properties in expressions that become discourse markers (DMs). These changes, it is argued, are comparable to those that take place in the development of other grammaticalizing linguistic items. DMs are taken to be sentence adverbials that express discourse-relational predications. Data from the histories of two English DMs, ‘instead’ and ‘rather’, are examined. These contrastive DMs are often interchangeable in present-day English but have very different origins, ‘instead’ deriving from the phrase ‘in (the) stead of NP’, and ‘rather’ from the comparative VP-adverb rather, meaning ‘sooner’ or ‘faster’. In each of the two cases, there is seen to be increased type frequency (with context expansion) and reanalysis (wider scope). The diachronic evidence supports the idea that the reanalysis resulted from wider interpretation, not from prior change in word order. As DMs, both ‘instead’ and ‘rather’ become associated with high informational salience. Both undergo functional split, leading to new polysemies. Insofar as the newer, DM senses are closer to the grammatical end of the lexical-grammatical cline, the expressions can be said to have grammaticalized. There is no evidence that any qualitatively special changes are involved in the emergence of the DM uses, compared with the developments of the other polysemies of the expressions.

About the article

Correspondence address: Dynamique du Langage Research Centre, University of Lyon 2, DDL-ISH, 14 avenue Berthelot, 69363 Lyon Cedex 07, France. E-mail:


Received: 2009-04-03

Revised: 2010-04-18

Published Online: 2011-03-04

Published in Print: 2011-03-01


Citation Information: Linguistics, Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 415–443, ISSN (Online) 1613-396X, ISSN (Print) 0024-3949, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.013.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Debra Ziegeler, Eric Mélac, and Volker Gast
Language Sciences, 2019, Volume 75, Page 15
[2]
Sakine Çabuk
International Journal of Multilingualism, 2018, Page 1
[3]
Bernd Heine, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva, and Haiping Long
Linguistics, 2017, Volume 55, Number 4
[4]
Valentin Werner
Corpus Pragmatics, 2017, Volume 1, Number 2, Page 135
[5]
Liesbeth Degand and Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2015, Volume 16, Number 1, Page 59

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in